Quote:
Originally Posted by Vansdad
Do you actually read what people post?
|
All of them in fact. To adopt your combative style however, I'll retort:
"Do you?". I'm just responding to
your endless list of outrageously inept dreck in which you re-define the facts and then provide silly statements that not one single atheist, or scientist for that matter (and they are NOT one and the same: well-educated [certainly far more than you, obviously, since your understanding of Evolution is truly mind-bendingly wrong...] and rational scientists are but a sub-set of atheists for the most part) has EVER made. You re truly amazing. I'm thinking: "major troll" now when I read your stuff. Why? Because then you dodge and dart with this kind of questioning.
Wow! No wonder some of us have recoiled at the utter hopelessness of debating with the likes of you. Have YOU not read Origin of the Species? Of course not! That woul be blasphemy, right?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vansdad
Thank you for admitting how we just don't know. But here is something to think about.
There are millions of transitional forms in the fossil record. Millions. However, there are no kind-to-kind transition forms (e.g., amoebas to cows). Transitional forms are evidence of God’s creation. Kind-to-kind transitional forms are evidence of Darwinian evolution of which there are none.
Just something to ponder
|
I, on the other hand,
have read most of Origin of The Species, and I did not find one single quote by that insightful individual where he claims to support your
kind-to-kind, so called" Darwinian Evolution", unless you are willing, here and now, to tell us exactly what the word" kind" means.
Rather, it's routinely & purposefully misused by Christians to re-define "species", but unfortunately for you, it does not. A Dalmation is a "kind" of dog, as is a terrier
(both genus "canis"; species domesticus). But a giraffe is NOT a kind of rabbit, or a kind of bacterium. And yet they both got here, not by "
poofistry", but by Evolution, and over 10s of measured millions of years, a little bit at a time, from a bacterium-like ancestor. But not EVER overnight, as
Vansad cleverly tried to suggest with a aura of unbelievability: a rat femur morphing into a girafe femur at it's other end.
(You've got that right: even I'd be awe-struck by that brainlessly inane idea!)
So... Are you REALLY that daftly-minded and ill-educated?
Seems so.
Vansdad, you are, quite simply and demonstrably, so far off base here that you have essentially teetered off the edge of the intellectual world. Zing, trundle......
ahhnnnnnd he's
gonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn......
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fillmont
It almost sounds like Vansdad is expecting there to be fossils of, say, a femur bone that starts off on one side as a rat femur and ends up on the other as the femur bone of a bear. I really have no idea what else a "kind to kind" fossil can possibly be.
|
It certainly does seem that way doesn't it,
Fillmont? Can he really be serious? Nahhhh... Whaddah
trollista!
OK: now it's back to my bat-cave. It
is a v. good thread though; worth reading for the shear humor and audacity of The Defenders of the Faith:
lots of good, thinking people making really good Olympic-gold winning quality logical points, but then a couple of
really intransigent defenders making truly inane and unsupportable deflective points, all while categorically refusing to answer the specific questions you've asked.
Just as I said in my recent summary; they
really are functionally incapable of that, and continue to demo it to us all!
The level of internal turmoil and fear must be near-maddening for them!