Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You've got me stumped again! How has the OP failed? He set us a challenge and is waiting for someone to meet that challenge. He doesn't have to produce any evidence of proof. Only to wait.
He isn't asking for anyone to prove his 'belief' as you put it, wrong. He's asked for anyone to produce a scientist in the field of biological science who disagrees with the theory of evolution and for what reasons. That's it. Can you find one?
This is actually even more pity.
The OP, probably has not done any cave digging in the remote wilderness of African caves where every other year a new "missing link" is found.
The OP probably also has not done any lab research on the fossils.
The OP is perhaps not a qualified scientists or biologist either.
So perhaps, he has read some material, may be a book and watched a few videos, and some google search, and then used his intelligence to put his FAITH into the theory of evolution.
If that's the case, then he can also use the same basic intelligence, and google for anti-evolution scientists, and their counter arguments. Most probably, he will find a few articles, that he can read and refute the scientists community and their claims.
What's the point of starting this thread when all he is looking for is a community of qualified scientists/biologists (which OP is not himself) who oppose human evolution?
The OP, probably has not done any cave digging in the remote wilderness of African caves where every other year a new "missing link" is found.
The OP probably also has not done any lab research on the fossils.
The OP is perhaps not a qualified scientists or biologist either.
So perhaps, he has read some material, may be a book and watched a few videos, and some google search, and then used his intelligence to put his FAITH into the theory of evolution.
If that's the case, then he can also use the same basic intelligence, and google for anti-evolution scientists, and their counter arguments. Most probably, he will find a few articles, that he can read and refute the scientists community and their claims.
What's the point of starting this thread when all he is looking for is a community of qualified scientists/biologists (which OP is not himself) who oppose human evolution?
All the time you have spent posting on this thread, you could have been finding an answer. Or at least trying. Instead, you spend all your time telling everyone why you won't look for an answer. The Op's point is, you guys always bring up scientists that don't believe evolution, but they are never scientists that are in the field of study to make the determination. So why don't you go find one?
Why are you even posting on the thread if you aren't interested in the premise?
The OP, probably has not done any cave digging in the remote wilderness of African caves where every other year a new "missing link" is found.
The OP probably also has not done any lab research on the fossils.
The OP is perhaps not a qualified scientists or biologist either.
So perhaps, he has read some material, may be a book and watched a few videos, and some google search, and then used his intelligence to put his FAITH into the theory of evolution.
If that's the case, then he can also use the same basic intelligence, and google for anti-evolution scientists, and their counter arguments. Most probably, he will find a few articles, that he can read and refute the scientists community and their claims.
What's the point of starting this thread when all he is looking for is a community of qualified scientists/biologists (which OP is not himself) who oppose human evolution?
You are certainly welcome.
And in spite of all your post, you still have not proven that evolution from a simple cell eventually to a fish eventually to something that crawled out of the pond which eventually morphed into a knuckle dragger which eventually morphed into a human ever occurred. You have no proof humans evolved from knuckle draggers. So why say it as if it is a scientific fact? Who are the real liars here? The evolutionist scientist, that's who.
The point of this thread is not to address so much whether evolution is true or not, but to address the claims made by creationists using the list from the DI to claim that their scientists have shown evolution to be wrong. Either the scientists on the list objecting to evolution can do so, and their followers such as yourself and gocard can provide this info , or they cant. Im asking for the reasons why the people on the list object to evolution.
All the time you have spent posting on this thread, you could have been finding an answer. Or at least trying. Instead, you spend all your time telling everyone why you won't look for an answer. The Op's point is, you guys always bring up scientists that don't believe evolution, but they are never scientists that are in the field of study to make the determination. So why don't you go find one?
Why are you even posting on the thread if you aren't interested in the premise?
so I did a basic google search.
Can't the OP do it?
Ok, that still doesn't do what the OP was asking. All the "dissent" says is that they are skeptical of it. It is still just a list of a bunch of scientists not in that field of study. So I will paraphrase and show you why it doesn't.
1) When you select your hero , you must show on what scientific basis he or she thinks evolution is wrong , complete with links to papers or such that he has written showing the flaws of evolution.
2) When you show why he believes evolution is flawed, please also show what his theory of how humans came about is.
So, find a scientist that is in that field of study, and find a paper or something written by that scientist, and we will talk. Not a "philosopher of science", or a Chemist, or an engineer. I left out step #3, because you need to get the first 2 before you can go there.
Try Googling some of the signatories. Some very interesting backgrounds. In fact, some of these "scientists" may be posting in this very thread.
OK, good for them. Anyone can right anything on the internet. The OP is also on the internet so he could be a bot? None of us has an observable scientific evidence in support of or against the human evolution. None of us has seen a monkey becoming a man or man being sent down to earth from haven. We are beating the bush on information acquired from internet.
OK, good for them. Anyone can right anything on the internet. The OP is also on the internet so he could be a bot? None of us has an observable scientific evidence in support of or against the human evolution. None of us has seen a monkey becoming a man or man being sent down to earth from haven. We are beating the bush on information acquired from internet.
Of course not. Why would anyone claim that? A monkey turning into a man is not what evolution is even about. I've already explained that to you, how nonsensical that is. But of course, you ignore it. Why is that? You keep asking for evidence of something that no one has claimed. I agree with you, you are absolutely correct, there is no evidence that a monkey became a man. Nor would we expect to find any.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
