Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-10-2016, 12:51 PM
 
Location: In a little house on the prairie - literally
10,202 posts, read 7,933,385 times
Reputation: 4561

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffbase40 View Post
How hard is it to understand that this is a manner of speaking that isn't meant to be taken literal? I prove this with other passages in the Bible.
How hard is it to understand the is *your* god doing the speaking. Not an interpretation. Not a metaphor (although it would be a horrible one if it was). And not allegory.

BTW, who gets to choose when something is not literal in the bible?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-10-2016, 12:53 PM
 
Location: In a little house on the prairie - literally
10,202 posts, read 7,933,385 times
Reputation: 4561
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eusebius View Post
I'm kind of curious why the naysayers never concentrate on "God is love" and "God is working all together for good" and "God will have all mankind to be saved"? Kind of strange to me. It is like being married to a woman who, all she can do is find fault with her husband and just harangues him day after day after day. There has to be a mental deficit for someone to continue doing that.
Because your god condones slavery, beating slaves, genocide, rape, child abuse and callousness towards grieving family members.

There is not much to like or love about that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2016, 01:00 PM
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
31,373 posts, read 20,208,174 times
Reputation: 14070
Quote:
Originally Posted by RonkonkomaNative View Post
Again, marginalizing women. Using them as examples for scorn, and derision. Much like the bible you adore.

How do you not see this?
He is spiritually blind, deaf and dumb.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2016, 02:05 PM
 
10,094 posts, read 5,743,001 times
Reputation: 2908
Quote:
Originally Posted by cupper3 View Post
Because your god condones slavery, beating slaves, genocide, rape, child abuse and callousness towards grieving family members.

There is not much to like or love about that.
None of which is true.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2016, 02:10 PM
 
Location: In a little house on the prairie - literally
10,202 posts, read 7,933,385 times
Reputation: 4561
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffbase40 View Post
None of which is true.
Of course it's true, Jeff, and you have been shown that many times. To deny that is to willfully turn a blind eye on the truth. Willfully denying reality.

But fundamentalists are good at doing that in justifying atrocities. It is just one step above what DEASH is doing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2016, 02:27 PM
 
Location: Baldwin County, AL
2,446 posts, read 1,388,934 times
Reputation: 605
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffbase40 View Post
None of which is true.
Another fundy who hasn't read their holy book.... Or another fundy who ignores all the nasty parts. I can never tell which.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2016, 04:29 PM
 
Location: State of Transition
102,228 posts, read 108,023,430 times
Reputation: 116189
Quote:
Originally Posted by RonkonkomaNative View Post
It matters, because there is a large group of men who want our laws to reflect this book.

Why did that God do that? It deserves an answer.
God didn't do it. A bunch of people imagined God did that, and wrote a book about it. Just because people say Jesus rose from the dead doesn't mean he did. Belief is not fact.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2016, 04:36 PM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
33,565 posts, read 37,168,881 times
Reputation: 14020
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffbase40 View Post
None of which is true.
Psalm 137:9 ....Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2016, 04:47 PM
 
5,187 posts, read 6,949,858 times
Reputation: 1648
Quote:
Originally Posted by RonkonkomaNative View Post
I think the story was a male sexual fantasy, like many others in the bible. Women being raped, and passed around to men. Girls having sex with their father. The belief Sodom and Gomorrah was about men having sex with men. An angry mob of men being offered a man's daughters to rape.

The theme of men controlling women is rampant. It is all about submitting to the will of men, who just happen to know the will of God. Sounds a little too convenient.

Sodom and Gomorrah would make South Beach and Las Vegas seem like big church-going cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2016, 05:57 PM
 
1,788 posts, read 1,173,349 times
Reputation: 196
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
Psalm 137:9 ....Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones.
"How blessed will be the one who seizes and dashes your little ones against the rock," (Psalm 137:9).
Critics often bring up this verse as an attack on the validity of the Bible, but does the Bible teach that it is okay to kill children? The answer, of course, is no it doesn't. We must ask what the Psalmist was saying and why he was saying it.
The context of Psalm 137 is the Babylonian captivity. The Psalmist speaks of the captors tormenting the people of God (vv. 1-3), a promise to remember Jerusalem (vv. 5-6), and a curse against the captors (vv. 7-9).
The Psalmist is in exile and had probably witnessed the atrocities committed against his people, babies included. In the revenge-style that was so common at the time, he wishes the same upon his enemy as a description of their utter destruction. Nowhere does it say that God approves of the Psalmist’s request or that he fulfilled it. Just because it is recorded that the Psalmist wrote the imprecation, doesn’t mean it was approved by God.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top