Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Christianity's greatest strength is that 99% of its members never crack the Bible. There is a very good reason why the Roman Catholic Church during the Middle Ages made it a crime punishable by death to possess a copy of the Bible. They were terrified that people reading the Bible would see that there was no mention of hell and everlasting punishment in it and that word would get around, taking away the church's teeth of eternal damnation, and so they executed several outstanding theologians as far away as Czechoslovakia for possessing a translation of it. Nowadays, Christianity's greatest strength is that people are too lazy to read such a monstrous volume. But Christianity's greatest weakness is that the Bible is responsible for turning more people to atheism than the 50 most famous atheists today. Atheists like Penn Gillette of Penn and Teller fame gleefully exclaims, "Don't believe a word I say. Just read the Bible. That's all I ask you to do."
The need for anyone to frequently inject references about their azz into conversations has to be what Freud would consider a person who's expressing anal-fixation.
Unfortunately, Arach, the vast majority of Christians are not that clear-thinking--if they're thinking at all.
i don't base any of my claims on a statement of belief about god so I would change the wording, well, because I am atheist.
the vast majority are just living their lives. I would say the vast majority of people do not know how to properly form a belief. Also, we can't ignore personality types, addiction, abuse, and mental illness.
Its real simple. claims that have explanations, mechanisms, predictions, and repeat are more valid than those that don't. The biblegod just doesn't have them. People may give an 'explanation", but often that is based on an axiom that isn't the most valid claim.
as you know, I apply the same rigor to my group's claims also. I run every claim through the scientific method. "anti-religion/god" just doesn't cut the mustard either.
The need for anyone to frequently inject references about their azz into conversations has to be what Freud would consider a person who's expressing anal-fixation.
so true.
but after we are laughing and/or shaking our head in disgust, lets list what they said and compare what they said to what we know?
but after we are laughing and/or shaking our head in disgust, lets list what they said and compare what they said to what we know?
We know that we are aging and that we are probably going to die one day.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.