Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It used to be said that materialism is the Philosophy which shall win in the end: no matter for what reason a human being can seek the meaningful values of idealism, in essence the idealism for the love of wisdom, as It never finds it for the solutions to mankind.
It it run into issue that now with computers and the advent of distinguished environmental thinking and historical action (Can Man truly act on history, especially with Materialistic knowledge by intent?) By intent Man is realizing God's intentions and purpose for the concrete Ideals of never coming to terms of human certainty.
Materialism from the nineteenth century always Had its materialist. Now there is no materialist, and this is supposed to be better. But perhaps if we could but Harken and hear the message from the new Calling materialist, a Jihad calling to the goals of the true fifth and final Pillar of Islam, the real meaning for the four corners of the Earth focused upon Mecca. But there is None.
So much is afraid of Marx's repetition of Dialectical Materialism, afraid of Survival of the Fittest and new revolutions for understanding the LIves in people's minds, afraid of absolute explanations for political subservience of scientific praxis and thinking. For that reason ideas of the magic technological future are doubted and not considered realizable for Futurism. We basically wish the world at peace with each one to his own ideal expectations with "materialism" nothing less OR more than the tested anthropology of really better forms of lying or self-deceipt.
I just wanted to ask what people at web-site think of the new superficial outlook of Materialism. Is this more justified to allow people to be thus subjective: at take Health Care in the Nationally Planned way.
By intent Man is realizing God's intentions and purpose for the concrete Ideals of never coming to terms of human certainty.
I will agree that there are humans who intend to understand the motives of a diety. Beyond this point your message is lost to bad grammar and punctuation, possibly because you didn't know what else to say. I do not agree that man "is realizing God's (should be Gods', God's is a contraction for God is, not a point I would agree is accurate) "Gods' intentions" are the intentions that God has. It seems that quite a few people are of the delusion that they know what their mythological god thinks. Grammar is designed to help people explain exactly what they intend to say. Bad grammar has the ability of making, even a good idea, sound absurd. This is not a reasonable idea to begin with.
Well, it just dawned on me that English may not be your native language. Some ideas are difficult to express even if one has good mastery in a language. I apologize for sounding snarly.
Last edited by Dusty Rhodes; 11-27-2009 at 12:07 PM..
That's alright; as long as the other computerization supporting opinion is also applauded.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
