Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Renting
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-20-2018, 12:37 PM
 
Location: North Central Florida
784 posts, read 729,897 times
Reputation: 1046

Advertisements

For total cost of home ownership, renting is cheaper.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-20-2018, 02:19 PM
 
486 posts, read 416,428 times
Reputation: 559
Quote:
Originally Posted by FIREin2016 View Post
For total cost of home ownership, renting is cheaper.
No.

We've gone over this over and over again. If it was, then landlord's would go out of business. Instead, real estate is one of the best ways to become wealthy. Long-term, it is much better financially to own. The longer we are talking about, the better owning is.

If for no other reason than the mortgage stays the same and then stops, owning is better. Renting only goes up in cost and NEVER stops. Even if you don't take into account selling the home, you are better off owning.

It is very basic math. If the landlord is paying for EVERYTHING you would have to pay for to own and still coming out ahead, you are paying more than owning.

You can talk about repairs, maintenance, roof replacements, vacancy, real estate taxes, closing costs, and on and on all you want, but guess what, the landlord pays for all those AND STILL COMES OUT AHEAD.

Yes, there are specific exceptions, but the vast majority of people will be better off owning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2018, 02:33 PM
 
Location: Boulder, CO
2,066 posts, read 901,317 times
Reputation: 3489
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eeko156 View Post
I can understand that, especially with not knowing where your kids will move to. I don't have any family that I am close to, so mobility is less of an issue.

My concern is, let's say I buy a nice 1-BR 1-BA condo in Boulder, and next year my eldest daughter wants to attend CU Boulder instead of UW in Laramie (my kids are 18, 16, 14, 13) ... I'll regret not having another BR. Or let's say I buy a 3 BR SFH, and never need BR's #2 and #3 ("too much house") ... too many unknowns at present, which should resolve/clarify in the next two years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2018, 03:34 PM
 
12,016 posts, read 12,764,116 times
Reputation: 13420
Quote:
Originally Posted by FIREin2016 View Post
For total cost of home ownership, renting is cheaper.
Not for me. My mortgage costs less than what it would cost to rent a room in someone's house in this area. I could rent a room and come out $150 a month ahead on my mortgage. To rent a home like mine it would cost 2 and a half times what my mortgage is.

So if you say that as an absolute it's wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2018, 04:55 PM
 
106,679 posts, read 108,856,202 times
Reputation: 80164
Quote:
Originally Posted by LLinVA View Post
No.

We've gone over this over and over again. If it was, then landlord's would go out of business. Instead, real estate is one of the best ways to become wealthy. Long-term, it is much better financially to own. The longer we are talking about, the better owning is.

If for no other reason than the mortgage stays the same and then stops, owning is better. Renting only goes up in cost and NEVER stops. Even if you don't take into account selling the home, you are better off owning.

It is very basic math. If the landlord is paying for EVERYTHING you would have to pay for to own and still coming out ahead, you are paying more than owning.

You can talk about repairs, maintenance, roof replacements, vacancy, real estate taxes, closing costs, and on and on all you want, but guess what, the landlord pays for all those AND STILL COMES OUT AHEAD.

Yes, there are specific exceptions, but the vast majority of people will be better off owning.
real estate is a long term investment . there are many many desirable areas where landlords have to pay their dues for quite a few years as a new investor before seeing positive cash flow . many times it is just the depreciation allowance that carries the property without going to much into the negative .

i think our kew gardens rental in queens took 5 or 6 years to turn positive back in the 1980's when we bought it ..

with mortgages at 8% our costs were 1250 a month ... the top rent was 850 at the time . the depreciation allowance carried us for years .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2018, 05:00 PM
 
Location: Mid-Atlantic
32,940 posts, read 36,369,350 times
Reputation: 43789
Default Are you okay with renting or do you get sad about it sometimes?

I feel a bit sad about it. Well, I will because I'm moving. When My husband and I rented a nice townhouse, the landlord decided to sell. Since we had to find a place in a hurry, we ended up in a different townhouse in the area which happened to be owned by an out-of-state slumlord. It took me two full days to scrape the crud out of the ancient refrigerator. After cleaning the hell out of the place for three months, I finally started to relax.

I don't like renting, but sometimes it's the only option.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2018, 05:11 PM
 
Location: In the Redwoods
30,357 posts, read 51,950,786 times
Reputation: 23786
Quote:
Originally Posted by LifeIsGood01 View Post
Not for me. My mortgage costs less than what it would cost to rent a room in someone's house in this area. I could rent a room and come out $150 a month ahead on my mortgage. To rent a home like mine it would cost 2 and a half times what my mortgage is.

So if you say that as an absolute it's wrong.
Well, I don't think there are any absolutes... but when you're calculating the costs, are you also including property tax, HOA fees (if you have them), closing costs, and regular/annual maintenance? Because if I go JUST on the mortgage payments, that could be true here too. But if I add in all of those other factors, it gets way more expensive than renting!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2018, 05:20 PM
 
12,016 posts, read 12,764,116 times
Reputation: 13420
Quote:
Originally Posted by gizmo980 View Post
Well, I don't think there are any absolutes... but when you're calculating the costs, are you also including property tax, HOA fees (if you have them), closing costs, and regular/annual maintenance? Because if I go JUST on the mortgage payments, that could be true here too. But if I add in all of those other factors, it gets way more expensive than renting!
I did add in property tax and homeowner's insurance that's part of my mortgage and it's still less than renting a bedroom in someone's house. But there are other costs and when I lived in the northeast if you rented an apartment it was standard to pay first month, security and last month so you pay three times rent just to get in. Also it's up to you to buy in a lower cost area if you can't afford the more expensive areas. that's what I had to do. I also bought in SW Florida and my property taxes only went up $15 this year, the only expensive thing here is the homeowner's insurance, but I got storm shutters for the windows and a wind mitigation report and it dropped 33%.

I have zero regrets about buying a house. I only regret renting for over 20 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2018, 06:49 PM
 
4,295 posts, read 2,766,820 times
Reputation: 6220
Quote:
Originally Posted by gizmo980 View Post
Well, I don't think there are any absolutes... but when you're calculating the costs, are you also including property tax, HOA fees (if you have them), closing costs, and regular/annual maintenance? Because if I go JUST on the mortgage payments, that could be true here too. But if I add in all of those other factors, it gets way more expensive than renting!
Of course, I mean to imply all costs when I say "mortgage", including PMI insurance if needed. Financial experts say to expect to pay between 1% and 2% for home maintenance (on average). For a $ 150,000 SFH in my area (you can get a house for that but the lot would be very small), that would be less than a condo fee (not including any special assessments, either).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2018, 06:51 PM
 
4,295 posts, read 2,766,820 times
Reputation: 6220
I am no real estate expert, I can only speak for my area, and it is cheaper to buy here than rent. The exception would be condos due to maintenance costs and assessments.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Renting

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:15 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top