Quote:
Originally Posted by jefffla01
...
The ss dilemma can be assisted by raising the retirement age for full benefits to 69 or 70-----doing away with ss benefits for the wealthy----a modest increase in ss taxes------reducing benefits for future retirees by maybe 11 or 12%------means testing for future retirees-----giving future retirees the option to opt out and have their ss contributions avialable for self investment ect........
...
|
Some of the reasons this is not that easy is because the politicians and the citizens don't have a clear idea on what the SS program is supposed to be.
Is it a mandatory retirement program or is it a public safety net for those did not (for any number of reasons) provide for an income stream in their old age?
If it is a mandatory retirement program with stated contributions and stated distributions it is simply theft if the distributions are curtailed for any reason.
If it is a tax funded safety net it needs to provide only modest benefits to those in need (obviously not to the well off), more of a welfare program for the elderly.
But instead we have confused the issues and want to sell it as retirement program where you contribute and then receive benefits, and then the politicians want to administer it as a welfare program where the successful savers no longer qualify.
I believe the governments (mostly because they are run by politicians) are too conflicted and incompetent to run these programs. Options may be that lightly regulated financial companies could offer annuities for any mandatory retirement programs and welfare programs could be used to offer vouchers as a safety net.
Obviously a transition from one mindset and plan to another will take time but we are certainly headed into a real death spiral on the current path.