Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-17-2016, 10:50 AM
 
Location: Chicago area
18,759 posts, read 11,809,167 times
Reputation: 64167

Advertisements

Personally I think you have more then enough to retire now aquatone. Yes I would sell the house. I retired at 58 and we have slightly less then what you have to retire on. We're doing fine and the money keeps coming in faster then we can spend it.

This last year and a half of freedom has been an amazing gift and we're both still young enough to enjoy it. Retire as soon as you can because age has a way of robbing you of what should be the best years of your life. Go have fun!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-17-2016, 11:20 AM
 
633 posts, read 582,567 times
Reputation: 715
Quote:
Originally Posted by animalcrazy View Post
Personally I think you have more then enough to retire now aquatone. Yes I would sell the house. I retired at 58 and we have slightly less then what you have to retire on. We're doing fine and the money keeps coming in faster then we can spend it.

This last year and a half of freedom has been an amazing gift and we're both still young enough to enjoy it. Retire as soon as you can because age has a way of robbing you of what should be the best years of your life. Go have fun!
Somehow I doubt everyone would agree. I would much rather go to work than stay home. And exactly what type of fun would I be having at 58 with kids at home. When I am 58 my youngest will be 13. I will have a kid in HS and a kid in college.

Trust me I am in my 50s it is not the best years of your life. I waited till 35 to get married as I knew 21-35 were the best years. No school and a job with income you can spend 100% on yourself, vacations, fast cars and faster women.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2016, 12:01 PM
 
9,837 posts, read 4,644,517 times
Reputation: 7292
Quote:
Originally Posted by aquatone View Post
...the answer is dependent on what level of income I need of course. My question is really to start getting a sense if other have made it work for them.

I was recently laid off my job in the tech industry at age 57 and though I am looking for new opportunities, a big part of me would really welcome a complete life change, more time for my own interests, and a reduction in expenses, and I have started wondering if I could retire early now.

I currently have just over $1.5M in retirement savings in diversified investments. (Including my 401K) I also own a desirable large house in the hyper-expensive SF Bay Area with around $1M in equity left if I were to sell and completely pay off the mortgage. So combined around $2.5M, though I would need to find a new place to live. I know the Bay Area is so expensive that moving to somewhere cheaper and more tex efficient almost certainly makes sense if I were to retire early - perhaps Arizona or New Mexico which I quite like.

All the retirement calculators I play with assume a retirement at age 66 and/or the same high salary I have been earning to date. If I did retire early I would need to bridge 8-years or so to when I can claim social security and medicare. I am not expecting $100K+ a year for the next 40 years. However, assuming a simpler and revised lifestyle in a cheaper area, have others made early retirement possible with this level of investment at my age?

Chris
Well Chris,

We are thinking of retiring about the same age, higher income, about 1m in house, about 1.5 saved... (so snap)

The way I see it , is that we currently save at least 30% of our income, maybe more so why would we need full income when we retire. The only increase in expenses would be healthcare , so we base our plans on retiring on 70% of income or less..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2016, 01:33 PM
 
Location: Eastern Washington
17,220 posts, read 57,124,095 times
Reputation: 18588
Quote:
Originally Posted by borninsac View Post
One thing I've discovered in my retire early retirement planning scenarios is the powerful impact that a legacy job has on stretching out your retirement nest-egg until SS kicks in. Play with your numbers to understand what I'm talking about.

I've used examples of being a bagger at Trader Joe's making as little as $12,000 a year (never seen a Trader Joe's employee who didn't seem happy and liking the work they do) and was surprised of the impact this pocket change job earnings had on the retirement planning math. Substitute your favorite version of that legacy job and do your own math.

To answer your question, you can absolutely do it at your age but take some time reading about those who have done it only to jump back on the work pony a few years later when they discovered that they still had more "umpf fire" in their belly and wanted a little more action familiar to them like their careers provided.

Good luck>
Although, if you are working at Trader Joe's, you are very likely living in a high cost of living area. But this is the same point I brought up about say working at Starbucks. And some people with long ago paid for houses (particularly in Cali) can live in a HCOLA while avoiding at least some of the high costs - frozen property taxes for example.

My younger sister is effectively retired at age 55, she works as a checker at a grocery store. This gives her spending money, avoids needing to draw down savings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2016, 02:06 PM
 
1,594 posts, read 3,578,958 times
Reputation: 1585
Quote:
Originally Posted by aquatone View Post
...the answer is dependent on what level of income I need of course. My question is really to start getting a sense if other have made it work for them.

I was recently laid off my job in the tech industry at age 57 and though I am looking for new opportunities, a big part of me would really welcome a complete life change, more time for my own interests, and a reduction in expenses, and I have started wondering if I could retire early now.

I currently have just over $1.5M in retirement savings in diversified investments. (Including my 401K) I also own a desirable large house in the hyper-expensive SF Bay Area with around $1M in equity left if I were to sell and completely pay off the mortgage. So combined around $2.5M, though I would need to find a new place to live. I know the Bay Area is so expensive that moving to somewhere cheaper and more tex efficient almost certainly makes sense if I were to retire early - perhaps Arizona or New Mexico which I quite like.

All the retirement calculators I play with assume a retirement at age 66 and/or the same high salary I have been earning to date. If I did retire early I would need to bridge 8-years or so to when I can claim social security and medicare. I am not expecting $100K+ a year for the next 40 years. However, assuming a simpler and revised lifestyle in a cheaper area, have others made early retirement possible with this level of investment at my age?

Chris
If you can find yourself a tax free municipal bond or bond fund to pay you 3% a year you can take home over 6k a month and never touch the principal.

New Mexico is pretty but generally a sh!tehole for services and stuff but you could buy a cheap house there and never work.

Could you look to move a little further out in NoCal?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2016, 02:11 PM
 
Location: NE Mississippi
25,598 posts, read 17,329,689 times
Reputation: 37373
Quote:
Originally Posted by aquatone View Post
...the answer is dependent on what level of income I need of course. My question is really to start getting a sense if other have made it work for them.

I was recently laid off my job in the tech industry at age 57 and though I am looking for new opportunities, a big part of me would really welcome a complete life change, more time for my own interests, and a reduction in expenses, and I have started wondering if I could retire early now.

I currently have just over $1.5M in retirement savings in diversified investments. (Including my 401K) I also own a desirable large house in the hyper-expensive SF Bay Area with around $1M in equity left if I were to sell and completely pay off the mortgage. So combined around $2.5M, though I would need to find a new place to live. I know the Bay Area is so expensive that moving to somewhere cheaper and more tex efficient almost certainly makes sense if I were to retire early - perhaps Arizona or New Mexico which I quite like.

All the retirement calculators I play with assume a retirement at age 66 and/or the same high salary I have been earning to date. If I did retire early I would need to bridge 8-years or so to when I can claim social security and medicare. I am not expecting $100K+ a year for the next 40 years. However, assuming a simpler and revised lifestyle in a cheaper area, have others made early retirement possible with this level of investment at my age?

Chris
I thought I could. But I didn't try.

GOOD THING! Gall bladder went out, hernia, kidney stone. I have never smoked, didn't drink much, exercised and so forth. Those were the first time I have ever been sick. Wife's knee blew out, and then a hiatal hernia.
Now we find out that we are fairly typical - most of our retired couple friends have had worse things than us.

Thank God we didn't try.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2016, 02:23 PM
 
Location: We_tside PNW (Columbia Gorge) / CO / SA TX / Thailand
34,755 posts, read 58,140,793 times
Reputation: 46252
Quote:
Originally Posted by M3 Mitch View Post
Although, if you are working at Trader Joe's, you are very likely living in a high cost of living area. But this is the same point I brought up about say working at Starbucks. And some people with long ago paid for houses (particularly in Cali) can live in a HCOLA while avoiding at least some of the high costs - frozen property taxes for example.

My younger sister is effectively retired at age 55, she works as a checker at a grocery store. This gives her spending money, avoids needing to draw down savings.
Costco is a great job for seniors / early retirees. Benefits + you can work nights, so you still have EVERYDAY off!

Airport shuttle drivers, similar (but unlikely to get benefits)
Top 11 Companies Offering Health Care Benefits and Other Perks to Part-Time Workers - ABC News
11 Best Part-Time Jobs With Health Insurance Benefits
Part Time Jobs That Offer Benefits

Holiday season is upon us... UPS, FED-EX pay pretty well, and you have the Amazon ARMY!

That can be followed up with IRS work, and soon it is Spring-time !!! go spend your dough and enjoy your RV! When (if) you reach age 62, you can enjoy the National Parks for $10!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2016, 02:25 PM
Status: "Nothin' to lose" (set 18 days ago)
 
Location: Concord, CA
7,195 posts, read 9,339,263 times
Reputation: 25712
Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener2307 View Post
I thought I could. But I didn't try.

GOOD THING! Gall bladder went out, hernia, kidney stone. I have never smoked, didn't drink much, exercised and so forth. Those were the first time I have ever been sick. Wife's knee blew out, and then a hiatal hernia.
Now we find out that we are fairly typical - most of our retired couple friends have had worse things than us.

Thank God we didn't try.
And that's the whole point.

You can retire at 57 and think that your health is fine. Why worry?

And then at 62, all hell breaks lose. If you don't have good insurance, you're screwed.

Wait until 65 to retire.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2016, 02:44 PM
 
2,009 posts, read 1,216,484 times
Reputation: 3757
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vision67 View Post
And that's the whole point.

You can retire at 57 and think that your health is fine. Why worry?

And then at 62, all hell breaks lose. If you don't have good insurance, you're screwed.

Wait until 65 to retire.
when you say "all hell breaks loose" can you be more specific?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2016, 02:50 PM
Status: "Nothin' to lose" (set 18 days ago)
 
Location: Concord, CA
7,195 posts, read 9,339,263 times
Reputation: 25712
Quote:
Originally Posted by FREE866 View Post
when you say "all hell breaks loose" can you be more specific?
e.g. heart attack, cancer, stroke.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:17 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top