Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-05-2018, 01:51 AM
 
106,668 posts, read 108,810,853 times
Reputation: 80154

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by NoMoreSnowForMe View Post
You've been really blessed not to ever have been in the position to have lost your home to foreclosure or become disabled, or never made enough money to have a large savings account when you lost a job, or lost everything in a divorce, etc.

I'm honestly happy for people in that position. I would hope that those people may be able to have empathy for those less fortunate.
i wasn't born with money , we were quite poor and i went through a late life divorce . so yeah i do know what it means to make ends meet . i just did what i had to , to make bad situations better and to allow for bad stuff in the the plan when it does happen instead of ruling it out
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-05-2018, 05:22 AM
 
Location: Lyon, France, Whidbey Island WA
20,834 posts, read 17,100,379 times
Reputation: 11535
from my reading if you don't co mingle money social security benefits are untouchable. where is that wrong?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2018, 01:11 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas
14,229 posts, read 30,031,639 times
Reputation: 27689
I think this is worthy of discussion. I didn't know about the debt thing but that's good information. I have another reason I think is valid. I currently get widow's benefits and sometime down the road a bit I am going to change all my direct deposits to my savings account. Because that's a pretty static place to park the money. I will just make 1 transfer per month to checking(I am allowed 3 transfers per month).

Back in January I had some fraud on my checking account. Everything worked out OK and I spotted the problem while the debit was still pending. But that meant I had to open a new account and restrict the old one. I have to go in to the bank to take funds out of that account now. And of course I had to change all my direct deposits. So the old account can't be closed till all the direct deposits transfer over to the new one. And it is a hassle. It would have been less of a problem if all the direct deposits went into savings, and since I don't pay anything directly out of that account, it's safer than putting the money in checking. Hope that makes sense!

It also might encourage me to save more!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2018, 01:49 PM
 
24,559 posts, read 18,254,477 times
Reputation: 40260
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
like everything we do , we plan around what is best and most plausible for the likely outcomes . i can't say i ever made decisions about keeping separate ss counts or kept 401k's with old companies because i was afraid of creditors .
In theory, you could have a court judgement against you for a car crash that exceeds your umbrella policy. You can never predict what a jury will do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2018, 01:58 PM
 
Location: Northern panhandle WV
3,007 posts, read 3,132,655 times
Reputation: 6797
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zack59 View Post
So, one can open a new checking or savings and have all their SS checks deposited for years and all that money is protected? Or just 2 months?
All that money is protected except against government liens.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2018, 02:51 PM
 
106,668 posts, read 108,810,853 times
Reputation: 80154
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffD View Post
In theory, you could have a court judgement against you for a car crash that exceeds your umbrella policy. You can never predict what a jury will do.


there is a limit to what makes sense . leaving 7 figures exposed to be taken if it is over and above insurance but saving a few k a month in ss protected makes no sense .

you need a better plan for asset protection . things have to make sense , not just be legal .

Last edited by mathjak107; 03-05-2018 at 04:16 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2018, 03:50 PM
 
Location: Raleigh
8,166 posts, read 8,525,471 times
Reputation: 10147
Umbrella policies are not expensive. Just ask. It can be just auto or any other liability. YMMV.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2018, 06:38 PM
 
24,559 posts, read 18,254,477 times
Reputation: 40260
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crashj007 View Post
Umbrella policies are not expensive. Just ask. It can be just auto or any other liability. YMMV.
That wasn't my point. My point was that some jury could decide to award $3 million when my umbrella policy is $1 million.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2018, 06:54 PM
 
2,951 posts, read 2,518,456 times
Reputation: 5292
^^^ seriously a $3 million dollar umbrelal is not goingto be 3 times the money. It might be just be $100.00 more. And worth it jstu so you don't have the attorney fees.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffD View Post
In theory, you could have a court judgement against you for a car crash that exceeds your umbrella policy. You can never predict what a jury will do.
That is why one should sets up trusts. And not the cheap kind.

Although its more complicated than just saying set up a trust. Every state has different laws.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2018, 07:29 PM
 
Location: Raleigh
8,166 posts, read 8,525,471 times
Reputation: 10147
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundapeanut View Post
^^^ seriously a $3 million dollar umbrelal is not goingto be 3 times the money. It might be just be $100.00 more. And worth it jstu so you don't have the attorney fees.
That is why one should sets up trusts. And not the cheap kind.
Although its more complicated than just saying set up a trust. Every state has different laws.
If you have any doubts about marriage partners of your kids then a living trust is definitely an important thing to consider.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Retirement

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top