Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I hereby resurrect this thread to point out Laurier CDP, Washington, which had a TOTAL population (not just permanent residents) of 1 as of the 2010 census. I don't personally believe that, as I live near there and it's actually kinda big (relative to other towns around it), but still...
Prairies and deserts are more conducive to nomadic herding and hunting. Entire towns/tribes carry their mobile homes on their own backs or horse/camel/ox etc. Learning how to live in a new habitat can take centuries.
Old thread but Lewis, VT. Population zero. Not a single settler was interested in the bogs or mountains there. Warner's Grant, VT. Also zero. Avery's Gore, VT, also zero. Warren Gore, VT, population 4. Glastenbury, VT, population 8. Somerset, VT, population 5. Averill, VT, population 24. Ferdinand, VT, population 32.
All of these places have low populations for a reason. Land that's not conducive to settlement (bogs, mountains), isolation, lack of access to employment. Most of them have large blocks of public lands today.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.