Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-12-2017, 01:52 PM
 
Location: California
1,424 posts, read 1,638,954 times
Reputation: 3149

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by PixelatedTherapy View Post
Vallejo. No question.
I understand that, but why?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-12-2017, 02:40 PM
 
520 posts, read 611,525 times
Reputation: 753
Quote:
Originally Posted by PixelatedTherapy View Post
But Vallejo is by definition coastal California, as it's less than 50 miles from the coastline. When you're speaking in terms of the wealth associated with the coast, then yes, you're right. It's not like SF, LA, or SD. Admittedly, there are some things about Vallejo I don't like. Not having BART is a bummer, and the bridge toll is annoying as well, but I feel the hate people place on Vallejo is a bit unfair. Like the Bay Area has far worse cities than Vallejo. Also, the bad parts of Vallejo aren't as bad as the bad areas in San Francisco, Richmond, or Oakland. I'd rather take a nighttime jog in The Crest than a daytime one in North or Central Richmond. I'm saying that because I have a friend who is moving out of Richmond, she works in the city and she wanted to live near BART. She thought it was worth it because it was cheap. After 3 months she broke lease because of all the crime. Even during the day I felt uneasy over there. Way worse than Vallejo. I guess it all depend, though.
North Richmond is its own isolated, dangerous pocket. It's actually unincorporated and not part of the city. But I'm skeptical that Central Richmond is worse than bad parts of Vallejo. I don't think the crime statistics bear this out, with crime rates similar between the two places. There is less to do in central Richmond v. downtown Vallejo though, which gives Richmond a more depressing vibe and may contribute to this feeling.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2017, 02:56 PM
 
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, California
522 posts, read 737,476 times
Reputation: 638
Quote:
Originally Posted by smashystyle View Post
North Richmond is its own isolated, dangerous pocket. It's actually unincorporated and not part of the city. But I'm skeptical that Central Richmond is worse than bad parts of Vallejo. I don't think the crime statistics bear this out, with crime rates similar between the two places. There is less to do in central Richmond v. downtown Vallejo though, which gives Richmond a more depressing vibe and may contribute to this feeling.
Maybe you're right. It was just there were way more people loitering on street corners in Richmond in general. Like you see some of that on Sonoma Blvd, or around Lemon Street near M&M Liquor, but not to the same extent as I saw happening in Richmond.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2017, 02:58 PM
 
Location: Sacramento
572 posts, read 599,209 times
Reputation: 1100
Cool. I imagine given the housing issues that Vallejo will become a better and better option for folks in the bay area... and like others have said a tipping point will eventually be reached where it changes from an affordable cool edgy fringe area with a diverse mix to a very high cost uber-trendy area like we've seen happen in many other parts of the bay.


Is there a good ferry service into SF? I imagine a commute into the city from Vallejo could get pretty old. But a ferry service would be cool.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2017, 03:00 PM
 
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, California
522 posts, read 737,476 times
Reputation: 638
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnS_15 View Post
Cool. I imagine given the housing issues that Vallejo will become a better and better option for folks in the bay area... and like others have said a tipping point will eventually be reached where it changes from an affordable cool edgy fringe area with a diverse mix to a very high cost uber-trendy area like we've seen happen in many other parts of the bay.


Is there a good ferry service into SF? I imagine a commute into the city from Vallejo could get pretty old. But a ferry service would be cool.
Yeah, there's ferry service directly to the city, and a bus that takes 20 minutes to El Cerrito BART.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2017, 03:25 PM
 
Location: I is where I is
2,096 posts, read 2,326,478 times
Reputation: 2359
Quote:
Originally Posted by PixelatedTherapy View Post
Yeah, there's ferry service directly to the city, and a bus that takes 20 minutes to El Cerrito BART.
The transportation system isn't god awful like people make it out to. The thing I wouldn't like is the Bridge situation as others have said. Good point with the ferry & bus systems
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-12-2017, 08:21 PM
 
1,289 posts, read 938,145 times
Reputation: 1940
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg10556 View Post
The transportation system isn't god awful like people make it out to. The thing I wouldn't like is the Bridge situation as others have said. Good point with the ferry & bus systems
I hear the Vallejo ferry goes straight to AT&T park. I'm sold.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2017, 04:08 AM
 
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, California
522 posts, read 737,476 times
Reputation: 638
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyinCali View Post
I understand that, but why?
Well, for starters, the weather is about 10-20 degrees cooler than Pittsburg in the summer. Pittsburg is kind of an ugly city, there's also a complete lack of a truly "nice" neighborhood. In Pittsburg there's just average and bad. Vallejo has pretty much every type of neighborhood you can think of. Both cities have their issues with crime. Pittsburg does have BART, but it's still a fairly long commute. Vallejo from purely a geographical standpoint is stunning; you have rolling hills, views of the bay, and the river, it's nice. Also Vallejo, despite the bridge toll is pretty close to everything, while Pittsburg is a bit further out. Vallejo is 13 miles from Napa, 18 miles Oakland/Berkeley 30 miles from San Francisco and 60 miles from Sacramento. It's also a bit cheaper than Pittsburg currently, but that may change. If you have kids, both school systems are trash, though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2017, 02:44 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
18,982 posts, read 32,656,174 times
Reputation: 13635
Quote:
Originally Posted by PixelatedTherapy View Post
Well, for starters, the weather is about 10-20 degrees cooler than Pittsburg in the summer. Pittsburg is kind of an ugly city, there's also a complete lack of a truly "nice" neighborhood. In Pittsburg there's just average and bad. Vallejo has pretty much every type of neighborhood you can think of. Both cities have their issues with crime. Pittsburg does have BART, but it's still a fairly long commute. Vallejo from purely a geographical standpoint is stunning; you have rolling hills, views of the bay, and the river, it's nice. Also Vallejo, despite the bridge toll is pretty close to everything, while Pittsburg is a bit further out. Vallejo is 13 miles from Napa, 18 miles Oakland/Berkeley 30 miles from San Francisco and 60 miles from Sacramento. It's also a bit cheaper than Pittsburg currently, but that may change. If you have kids, both school systems are trash, though.
Why wouldn't the new developments off San Marco's Blvd count as "truly nice"? Outside Hiddenbrook, which is completely isolated from the rest of Vallejo, I really don't see anything nicer there than what you find around San Marco's Blvd.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2017, 07:36 PM
 
Location: where the good looking people are
3,814 posts, read 4,011,395 times
Reputation: 3284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg10556 View Post
The average temps during the "winter" are highs in 50's-60's and lows in the 40's. Yeah I'm sure it gets cold during the night at times, but compared to real winters, that's mild
No.

Average low in Sac is 38 degrees, in January. That is just 6 degrees over freezing. And that is the AVERAGE. There are quite a few dayd were it is below average and hits below freezing.


I lived in Sac and there were usually a few days each year, where ICE had to be defrosted off the windows first thing in the morning (when the day is coldest).

Once in a blue moon, every few years, i t goes down into the 20's, which at that point feels like a winter back east. It does heat up in the day, but only to the Low 50's.

Not that Vallejo is any better in that regard. It get's as cold as Sac, just not as hot in the summer. It's about 10 degrees cooler during the day in the summer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:40 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top