Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-30-2010, 09:16 PM
 
Location: Pasadena
7,411 posts, read 10,388,557 times
Reputation: 1802

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by user_id View Post
Because people tend to cluster around like minded people. Certain parts of the bay area have been liberal for a long time though.
The Bay Area is over 7 million people [that's a lot of clustering ]. I think you have to face the truth that the Bay Area did not leave the Republican party but rather the Republican party left the Bay Area [or all of California for that matter]. Ronald Reagan would not be welcomed in the Republican party today and that is sad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-30-2010, 09:20 PM
 
1,687 posts, read 6,073,266 times
Reputation: 830
Quote:
Originally Posted by californio sur View Post
How do you explain that Republicans do so poorly in the Bay Area?
Maybe because SF liberals prefer to elect stupid politicians? Do you ever follow the SF Board of Supervisors? Some of the biggest elected fools in the state.

And FYI, Bill Maher said last year "it's always that limousine liberal crowd that just has their finger on the politically correct button.....That's what bugs me the most about liberals is that they just...they object before they even know what they're objecting to."

Maher also has said "And I would say especially on campuses in the last 10 or 15 years, the repression of speech has come more from the left."

So Maher also thinks liberals are too politically correct and try to hard to suppress (and put down) the opinions of those they don't agree with.

I do not think those behaviors show intelligence, instead they show a prejudice against a group of people which is just as bad for our country as racism & bigotry, sexism, etc. We cannot attack and putdown those we do not agree with or who are different than us for ANY reason.

Will we wake up one day to discover new Blacklists created by liberals that are used just as earlier lists were used by McCarthyites in the 1950s?

No wonder so many people are moving toward independent status somewhere in the middle of the spectrum, both sides are too extreme. If you hate one extreme political opinion you should also hate the other, neither does our country any good.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2010, 09:23 PM
 
Location: Pasadena
7,411 posts, read 10,388,557 times
Reputation: 1802
Quote:
Originally Posted by FresnoFacts View Post
Maybe because SF liberals prefer to elect stupid politicians? Do you ever follow the SF Board of Supervisors? Some of the biggest elected fools in the state.

And FYI, Bill Maher said last year "it's always that limousine liberal crowd that just has their finger on the politically correct button.....That's what bugs me the most about liberals is that they just...they object before they even know what they're objecting to."

Maher also has said "And I would say especially on campuses in the last 10 or 15 years, the repression of speech has come more from the left."

So Maher also thinks liberals are too politically correct and try to hard to suppress (and put down) the opinions of those they don't agree with.

I do not think those behaviors show intelligence, instead they show a prejudice against a group of people which is just as bad for our country as racism & bigotry, sexism, etc. We cannot attack and putdown those we do not agree with or who are different than us for ANY reason.

Will we wake up one day to discover new Blacklists created by liberals that are used just as earlier lists were used by McCarthyites in the 1950s?

No wonder so many people are moving toward independent status somewhere in the middle of the spectrum, both sides are too extreme. If you hate one extreme political opinion you should also hate the other, neither does our country any good.
So the voters are stupid? Since the Bay Area is overwhelmingly Democratic that would mean they are overwhelmingly stupid, in your opinion. Since Fresno voted for Obama, I suppose it is now also a stupid city?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2010, 10:23 PM
 
Location: Conejo Valley, CA
12,460 posts, read 20,085,650 times
Reputation: 4365
Quote:
Originally Posted by californio sur View Post
The Bay Area is over 7 million people [that's a lot of clustering ]. I think you have to face the truth that the Bay Area did not leave the Republican party but rather the Republican party left the Bay Area [or all of California for that matter].
Right that is a lot of clustering, the larger a cluster gets the more people it will attract and the more it will repel those that don't fit in. The majority of the people in the bay area are transplants and the bay area has been attracting liberals for decades. The clustering of liberals in the bay area has everything to do with its history and nothing to do with "the republican party leaving the bay area".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2010, 10:27 PM
 
1,650 posts, read 3,518,810 times
Reputation: 1142
Quote:
Originally Posted by user_id View Post
Right that is a lot of clustering, the larger a cluster gets the more people it will attract and the more it will repel those that don't fit in. The majority of the people in the bay area are transplants and the bay area has been attracting liberals for decades. The clustering of liberals in the bay area has everything to do with its history and nothing to do with "the republican party leaving the bay area".
Thats the best thing about bay area. It repels conservatives like no other place! Maybe they can start a Pride parade and put some housing projects in Danville and Walnut Creek and see the lingering conservative enclaves vanish!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2010, 10:34 PM
 
Location: Conejo Valley, CA
12,460 posts, read 20,085,650 times
Reputation: 4365
Quote:
Originally Posted by andyadhi01 View Post
Thats the best thing about bay area. It repels conservatives like no other place! Maybe they can start a Pride parade and put some housing projects in Danville and Walnut Creek and see the lingering conservative enclaves vanish!
I find it funny to what degree people associate liberal with gay-rights, etc while ignoring everything else. Anyhow, the people in Danville and Walnut Creek are unlikely to care about a "pride parade".

If you push out the conservatives in the bay area you will also push out most the money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2010, 10:49 PM
 
Location: Pasadena
7,411 posts, read 10,388,557 times
Reputation: 1802
Quote:
Originally Posted by user_id View Post
Right that is a lot of clustering, the larger a cluster gets the more people it will attract and the more it will repel those that don't fit in. The majority of the people in the bay area are transplants and the bay area has been attracting liberals for decades. The clustering of liberals in the bay area has everything to do with its history and nothing to do with "the republican party leaving the bay area".
Republicans try their darnest to convince themselves that they have any kind of influence in California. To suggest that people in the Bay Area are all transplants is impossible to prove and actually the opposite may be correct. Native Californian's used to vote Republican but now don't. Historically you might want to study Nixon's "Southern strategy" that resulted in all Dixiecrats [former Democrats] leaving their life long party to join the Republican party. They left the Democratic party because the Republicans encouraged racism in order to get votes [real nice people, huh?]. Former Dixiecrats hated Republicans because they hated President Lincoln but they quickly left the Democratic party when it embraced integration. This process of the South becoming Republican took a while.

Here's an article on how radical the Republicans have become and how even Ronald Reagan would not be accepted by Republicans today:
Today's GOP could snub even Reagan - Page 2 - Los Angeles Times
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2010, 10:53 PM
 
1,650 posts, read 3,518,810 times
Reputation: 1142
Quote:
Originally Posted by user_id View Post
If you push out the conservatives in the bay area you will also push out most the money.
I don't think so! Lot of the wealthy people here are liberals. Also bay area has large wealthy Asian/Indian population and vast majority of them vote democrat. This is not orange county! Sorry..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2010, 11:02 PM
 
Location: South Korea
5,242 posts, read 13,077,874 times
Reputation: 2958
Quote:
Originally Posted by user_id View Post

If you push out the conservatives in the bay area you will also push out most the money.
They already left because they hated everyone, and San Francisco is still one of the wealthiest cities in the US and the Bay Area one of the wealthiest areas.

Seriously, I think people in SF wouldn't hate the GOP so much if Republicans weren't always going around spewing their hatred of anyone who isn't a rich straight white male and generalizing about how everyone in the Bay Area is some kind of drag queen communist dominatrix. Most people in the Bay Area are just totally normal people trying to get by, and we get tired of this kind of BS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2010, 11:18 PM
 
Location: Conejo Valley, CA
12,460 posts, read 20,085,650 times
Reputation: 4365
Quote:
Originally Posted by californio sur View Post
To suggest that people in the Bay Area are all transplants is impossible to prove and actually the opposite may be correct.
Its not impossible at all, just look at the migration statistics and population growth. In the 50's the bay area was pretty much 50/50 and it has slowly become more liberal over the last 60 years. The population tripled in that time, which is much to quick for it to be from births.

I'm not interested in your republican vs democrat stuff. I'm only talking about how the bay area has become a cluster of "liberals".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > San Francisco - Oakland
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top