Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Florida > Sarasota - Bradenton - Venice area
 [Register]
Sarasota - Bradenton - Venice area Manatee and Sarasota Counties
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-21-2024, 01:04 PM
 
17,533 posts, read 39,105,017 times
Reputation: 24287

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Above Average Bear View Post
Does anyone know how much realtors make hourly on an average sale? I’m guessing it’s pretty damn good! Especially in an up market.
A good realtor does really well. However, probably the majority of realtors (and or part-timers) probably don't even make minimum wage. Remember, they are independent contractors, and not only split their commissions with other agents but their brokerage firms, and all of their expenses (for the most part) are their own. So it isn't always as good as people think. I used to be one back in the 70s, but things were very different then.

It doesn't take much to get a real estate license, but it is a LOT of hard work to become a good, successful realtor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-21-2024, 03:30 PM
 
Location: Sarasota/ Bradenton - University Pkwy area
4,612 posts, read 7,529,570 times
Reputation: 6026
Quote:
Originally Posted by gypsychic View Post
A good realtor does really well. However, probably the majority of realtors (and or part-timers) probably don't even make minimum wage. Remember, they are independent contractors, and not only split their commissions with other agents but their brokerage firms, and all of their expenses (for the most part) are their own. So it isn't always as good as people think. I used to be one back in the 70s, but things were very different then.

It doesn't take much to get a real estate license, but it is a LOT of hard work to become a good, successful realtor.

We also have to pay 100% of the social security & medicare taxes due on any profits we make. The IRS gets very cranky if we don't make the appropriate quarterly payments.


There's an article out on Housingwire that explains buyer representation and what may be the end results of these "seismic changes" for buyers going forward. The outlook is quite different then the headlines CNN and others have been blasting for the past few days.

Here's the link for those wishing to read the entire article, it's not actually that long:
https://www.housingwire.com/articles...n-real-estate/


It starts out explaining that co-brokes & buyers commissions were not always part of the real estate industry, but rather changes that came about in the early 1990's.

Before the 1990s, the concept of “buyer beware” prevailed, leaving buyers without representation and vulnerable to exploitation or disadvantage. Many buyers struggled with the financial burden of covering closing costs, making it difficult or impossible to also cover the compensation for agent representation.

The dramatic volume of lawsuits filed by aggrieved buyers highlighted the urgent need for change—a need our government in all of its infinite wisdom (sarcasm intended) failed to address at the time. Stepping up to this challenge, real estate professionals pioneered a solution to safeguard these unrepresented buyers. This innovation, known as commission sharing or “cooperative compensation,” fundamentally altered the real estate landscape and better protected buyers.



Also from the article:

The prospect of buyers directly compensating their agents, rather than relying on sellers to do so, might appear equitable at first glance. However, this shift risks significant repercussions, particularly for buyers with limited capital. Many buyers, especially first-timers, might find themselves unable to afford representation, potentially foregoing it altogether.

and

The Department of Justice’s (DOJ) drive to prohibit sellers from compensating buyer’s agents poses a particularly severe challenge for low-income home buyers. While affluent purchasers of million-dollar properties may navigate the market with ease, regardless of representation costs, they represent a mere 7% of the real estate market. Conversely, properties priced below $400,000—encompassing around half of all U.S. home sales—often attract buyers who are stretching their financial limits to achieve home ownership.


Many here in the Sarasota area are fortunate to be affluent enough not to have to worry about adding buyer agent fees to their costs, so the upcoming changes will not have much of an impact on them, but that cannot be said for 93% of the home buying public.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Florida > Sarasota - Bradenton - Venice area
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top