Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
2.5 million years is early or pre-Pleistocene - pre Homo Erectus. Is the claim that early "man" crafted a "compact block of tobacco" to chew or smoke 2.5 million years ago in Peru?
2.5 million years is early or pre-Pleistocene - pre Homo Erectus. Is the claim that early "man" crafted a "compact block of tobacco" to chew or smoke 2.5 million years ago in Peru?
2.5 million years is early or pre-Pleistocene - pre Homo Erectus. Is the claim that early "man" crafted a "compact block of tobacco" to chew or smoke 2.5 million years ago in Peru?
The article didn't state whether it was wild or cultivately grown correct? Anyway i was mentioning over in the CD history forums reciently about how i was wondering that if Homo Erectus has been found in China then why couldn't his/her fossilized bones be under the permafrost in Canada.
Anyway if cultivated that possibly blows a hole in the Siberian migration over the Bering Strait either 17,000 and/or 40,000 b.c. as being the earliest humans to reside in North America.
It's fairly clear from the quotes that they are merely stating that the plants origins and make no mention of man.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
