Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > South Carolina
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-22-2006, 08:23 PM
 
2,536 posts, read 9,218,920 times
Reputation: 1082

Advertisements

According to an article in the Herald (out of Rock Hill, SC) Rock Hill is the third-fastest growing city in S.C. from 2000 to 2005 according to the new Census Bureau estimates. The city remains the 4th largest in the state.

Rock Hill trailed only by Mount Pleasant and Summerville as South Carolina's fastest growing cities over a 5 year period.

It also states that 6 of the 10 fastest-growing cities are along the coast. Mount Pleasant added more residents than anywhere since 2000 and surpassing the population of Greenville.

Charleston finishes top 5 along with North Charleston as they complete the top 5 fastest growing municipalities.

Greer, Mauldin, Myrtle Beach, Lexington and North Myrtle Beach are the remainder of the top 10.

It also goes on to say several areas along the beach are losing full time residents...such as: Kiawah Island, Seabrook Island and Sullivans Island.


You can view the entire article at (heraldonline)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-23-2006, 04:43 AM
KMT
 
80 posts, read 356,025 times
Reputation: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by lovethecarolinas
According to an article in the Herald (out of Rock Hill, SC) Rock Hill is the third-fastest growing city in S.C. from 2000 to 2005 according to the new Census Bureau estimates. The city remains the 4th largest in the state.

Rock Hill trailed only by Mount Pleasant and Summerville as South Carolina's fastest growing cities over a 5 year period.

It also states that 6 of the 10 fastest-growing cities are along the coast. Mount Pleasant added more residents than anywhere since 2000 and surpassing the population of Greenville.

Charleston finishes top 5 along with North Charleston as they complete the top 5 fastest growing municipalities.

Greer, Mauldin, Myrtle Beach, Lexington and North Myrtle Beach are the remainder of the top 10.

It also goes on to say several areas along the beach are losing full time residents...such as: Kiawah Island, Seabrook Island and Sullivans Island.


You can view the entire article at (heraldonline)
[CENTER][LEFT]L T C: Thanks for the information. Coastal communities here in Florida are experiencing rapid growth as well...in spite of huricanes!

Google "fastest growing cities" or "counties" and you'll see many among the top 25 are in FLA. Nice to see that the upstate region of SC is not experiencing the same growth.

Keith
[/LEFT][/CENTER]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2006, 09:48 AM
 
2,356 posts, read 3,482,489 times
Reputation: 864
That's interesting.

With respect to Kiawah Island, Sullivan's Island, etc., the populations are probably dropping because of the insane housing prices. In the 1930's-1960's, a middle-upper class family from Anytown, SC could sell their home and buy one on Sullivan's Island. Now $1 million is the bare minimum for these prime areas. If I owned beachfront property, I would be equally concerned with the natural erosion of beaches as I would be with hurricanes.

Rock Hill is growing because of its proximity to Charlotte - as Greer is to Greenville, and Lexington is to Columbia. I think it's true (but misleading) for them to say that Mount Pleasant is bigger than Greenville. The city of Greenville is very small (50,000 people), the Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson area is what matters (1.1 million people).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2013, 03:05 PM
 
Location: Greenville, SC
281 posts, read 427,016 times
Reputation: 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by anonymous View Post
That's interesting.

With respect to Kiawah Island, Sullivan's Island, etc., the populations are probably dropping because of the insane housing prices. In the 1930's-1960's, a middle-upper class family from Anytown, SC could sell their home and buy one on Sullivan's Island. Now $1 million is the bare minimum for these prime areas. If I owned beachfront property, I would be equally concerned with the natural erosion of beaches as I would be with hurricanes.

Rock Hill is growing because of its proximity to Charlotte - as Greer is to Greenville, and Lexington is to Columbia. I think it's true (but misleading) for them to say that Mount Pleasant is bigger than Greenville. The city of Greenville is very small (50,000 people), the Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson area is what matters (1.1 million people).
2012
Greenville City - 61,674
Greenville - Spartanburg - Anderson - 1.4 million
Mount Pleasant isn't going to stay larger than Greenville

Last edited by kgartm1185; 03-23-2013 at 03:07 PM.. Reason: update
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2013, 03:34 PM
 
37,902 posts, read 42,041,430 times
Reputation: 27305
Quote:
Originally Posted by kgartm1185 View Post
2012
Greenville City - 61,674
Greenville - Spartanburg - Anderson - 1.4 million
Mount Pleasant isn't going to stay larger than Greenville
No one can say that for certain. However, it's common knowledge that Greenville doesn't pursue annexation as vigorously as some other places in the state, which is why Mt. Pleasant zoomed ahead of it in municipal population. This strategy has its upsides, but there's definitely a disadvantage in terms of perception.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-23-2013, 08:04 PM
 
Location: Greenville, SC
281 posts, read 427,016 times
Reputation: 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutiny77 View Post
No one can say that for certain. However, it's common knowledge that Greenville doesn't pursue annexation as vigorously as some other places in the state, which is why Mt. Pleasant zoomed ahead of it in municipal population. This strategy has its upsides, but there's definitely a disadvantage in terms of perception.
Agreed, What are the advantages?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2013, 03:27 PM
 
37,902 posts, read 42,041,430 times
Reputation: 27305
Quote:
Originally Posted by kgartm1185 View Post
Agreed, What are the advantages?
The city has been able to target downtown in particular for investment and infrastructure improvements and doesn't have to worry about many of the outlying neighborhoods that are outside the city limits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2013, 10:38 AM
 
Location: Charlotte (Hometown: Columbia SC)
1,462 posts, read 2,964,783 times
Reputation: 1194
Urban Area Population

Charlotte-NC-SC - 1,310,000
Columbia - 557,000
Charleston - 557,000
Greenville - 405,000
Augusta GA-SC - 390,000
Myrtle Beach NC-SC - 221,000
Spartanburg - 183,000
Maudlin - 121,000
Rock Hill - 105,000

I included the border cities since their urban areas reach across state lines.

http://demographia.com/db-worldua.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2013, 12:43 PM
 
5,492 posts, read 8,338,515 times
Reputation: 2248
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonofaque86 View Post
Urban Area Population

Charlotte-NC-SC - 1,310,000
Columbia - 557,000
Charleston - 557,000
Greenville - 405,000
Augusta GA-SC - 390,000
Myrtle Beach NC-SC - 221,000
Spartanburg - 183,000
Maudlin - 121,000
Rock Hill - 105,000

I included the border cities since their urban areas reach across state lines.

http://demographia.com/db-worldua.pdf
It's interesting that Mauldin is separate even though it borders Greenville's city limits, and is definitely tied in. Same thing with Concord and Charlotte. How do they designate these?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2013, 03:24 PM
 
1,289 posts, read 2,580,307 times
Reputation: 661
Quote:
Originally Posted by redcliffe View Post
It's interesting that Mauldin is separate even though it borders Greenville's city limits, and is definitely tied in. Same thing with Concord and Charlotte. How do they designate these?
I believe it's based on population densities? The largely undeveloped Hollingsworth property in Greenville hurts, but we are seeing it developed today with Verdae, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > South Carolina

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top