Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-17-2016, 09:26 AM
 
9,837 posts, read 4,645,148 times
Reputation: 7292

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by bryan85 View Post
I'm 57, and I remember when boxing was very popular. I think the decline in popularity has more to do with boring fights (heavyweights just lean on each other), and people realizing the corruption involved. To me, it's like the Olympics- I rarely watch them anymore because so many particpents are cheating.
I think the decline was linked to the brutality of the sport and the stupid move to Pay per view.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-17-2016, 09:53 AM
 
Location: Georgia
3,987 posts, read 2,116,685 times
Reputation: 3111
Quote:
Originally Posted by evilcart View Post
I think the decline was linked to the brutality of the sport and the stupid move to Pay per view.
I'll agree with you on Pay per view. I think our society by and large likes brutality. One other thought- boxing matches in the movies are so much better than real ones!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2016, 11:55 AM
 
Location: NE Mississippi
25,607 posts, read 17,334,751 times
Reputation: 37378
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7 Wishes View Post
I know it's hard to believe otherwise, but we do have a precedent. Ask any sports fan over 60 about how popular boxing once was (I'm a little bit shy of 50 and I can even remember it's "last heyday" a little bit). It still exists of course, but it's a shadow of what it was and a lot of why we still have boxers is they are often foreigners who did not have as much of a stigma on training young. Perhaps this is what's going to happen to football, though I think it will take a good quarter century or more.

Or maybe it will be just as popular, but all the players will be from less developed countries. To some extent, hockey is a good example of this, which also has somewhat of an issue with the amount of physical contact to the head (not as noted in the US but talked about a lot in Canada I hear). A lot more players now coming from Scandinavia and the former Soviet Bloc whereas once (as recently as 20-30 years ago) almost EVERYONE in the NHL was from Canada with a significant sprinkling from the northern US.
Another example I can think of is baseball.
I'm 70. When I was a kid baseball was king. Football was a distant second; basketball hardly existed as far we were concerned.

Was it so very long ago that everyone followed NASCAR?

The educational system is better off without football in their midst. It does not, as they claim, teach "teamwork and sportsmanship".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2016, 12:19 PM
jw2
 
2,028 posts, read 3,268,827 times
Reputation: 3387
Quote:
Originally Posted by lunetunelover View Post
...

I do have to wonder, though, why such an outcry about NFL/American football but not rugby?
It may be because rugby does not have helmets.

Joe Paterno used to say that face masks have made it more dangerous for players because they started tackling with their heads as they were more "protected", or felt they were anyway.

Have injuries become worse as helmets improved? Something to think about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2016, 12:33 PM
 
4,873 posts, read 3,607,744 times
Reputation: 3881
It's doomed, I mean look at cigarette smoking. People figured out it was bad for you, and bam, a century later it was only half as popular.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2016, 01:13 PM
 
Location: Tejas
7,599 posts, read 18,419,666 times
Reputation: 5252
Quote:
Originally Posted by jw2 View Post
It may be because rugby does not have helmets.

Joe Paterno used to say that face masks have made it more dangerous for players because they started tackling with their heads as they were more "protected", or felt they were anyway.

Have injuries become worse as helmets improved? Something to think about.
Being an non football fan I have always said that, one guy literally runs head first into another guy and its considered a good tackle. In Rugby you have to grab that guy and pull him to the ground for a good tackle. Teach players to tackle properly, not just run into each other head first.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2016, 01:19 PM
 
Location: EPWV
19,556 posts, read 9,565,771 times
Reputation: 21318
Is it time for 'flag' or 'tag' football?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2016, 01:25 PM
 
Location: Live in NY, work in CT
11,311 posts, read 18,916,170 times
Reputation: 5146
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
boxing isnt really a precedent. it started going away when ali, frazier, and foreman retired. tyson carried teh sport for a while until he lost the title to buster douglas, and then a few years later bit holyfields(i think, its been a while) ear in a losing effort, and had various legal problems.

but boxing would have fallen off in popularity anyway with the rise of MMA.
I guess you didn't note my second paragraph where I say it could be just as popular (I'll agree one big difference is that football is a weekly team sport and not an occasional individual event that is hyped up) but we'll have mostly foreign players, using hockey as the analogy for that.

I also noted it will still take a LONG time for football to decline and/or change, like maybe 25 years or more.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankMiller View Post
It's doomed, I mean look at cigarette smoking. People figured out it was bad for you, and bam, a century later it was only half as popular.
Century? I think it's taken less than HALF a century to halve the smoking rate.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener2307 View Post
Another example I can think of is baseball.
I'm 70. When I was a kid baseball was king. Football was a distant second; basketball hardly existed as far we were concerned.
What made baseball decline is different, not injuries:

1) Basketball is a much cheaper sport for poor and/or inner city kids to take up and baseball, especially in an organized form is a lot more expensive than it was 50 years ago to both play and see in person.

2) A generation of kids fed on instant gratification find baseball "boring".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2016, 01:26 PM
46H
 
1,655 posts, read 1,404,823 times
Reputation: 3625
The number of kids under age 14 playing football has dropped from 6%-10% over the last 10 years. This trend will continue. There is enough information available now to cause parents to reject football. The slow but steady rise of soccer in the USA might be traced to all the kids who now play soccer. Soccer has become a viable alternative fall sport for football.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2016, 02:38 PM
 
4,873 posts, read 3,607,744 times
Reputation: 3881
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7 Wishes View Post
Century? I think it's taken less than HALF a century to halve the smoking rate.
But a century ago, the smoking rate was going up, not down. So the dropoff actually looks better if you compare today against half a century ago when smoking peaked, versus comparing against a century ago (really more like 80 years ago) when we learned that smoking is bad. In fact, the smoking rate may have actually gone up since we discovered it's bad for you, but it's hard to tell because I can only find stats for tobacco consumption per capita and not specifically rates of smokers vs nonsmokers.

I think the current status of football is more like the "hey guys this looks dangerous" status of smoking in the 30s, than the "we officially treat this as a public health crisis at the highest levels of government" status of smoking since the 60s.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:30 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top