Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I just noticed two threads are closed (locked) Eve Carson and Jeff Ashton ... why did these two get closed? The Bush Blair war crimes post was never closed and really didn't belong on True Crime as it was being discussed in Politics and Great Debates.
When the discussion turns into two people bickering, threads will be closed. It means the topic is exhausted.
You will note, I tried to save the threads, by attempting to steer the focus back on the subject of the thread. Usually, I will give a notice, prior to closing a thread. In an attempt to corral everyone back on task...but, when ignored, it is time to close the thread.
When the discussion turns into two people bickering, threads will be closed. It means the topic is exhausted.
You will note, I tried to save the threads, by attempting to steer the focus back on the subject of the thread. Usually, I will give a notice, prior to closing a thread. In an attempt to corral everyone back on task...but, when ignored, it is time to close the thread.
Thanks for the info ... yes I see the bickering too!
When the discussion turns into two people bickering, threads will be closed. It means the topic is exhausted.
You will note, I tried to save the threads, by attempting to steer the focus back on the subject of the thread. Usually, I will give a notice, prior to closing a thread. In an attempt to corral everyone back on task...but, when ignored, it is time to close the thread.
Just wondering why you close the threads instead of deleting the questionable posts? You will do as you see fit I guess, I was just curious?
I try to not edit or delete posts. I think most of the time people have a valid reason for their point of view. If I have a question, I will defer to the "tribe", rather than be heavy handed "post" police.
If I close something, you want it back open, send me a DM. This is your forum. You guys are in charge. I am just the driver.
I am not going to take the time to edit and cut threads/posts. Usually the topic is exhausted.
I didn't think the Ashton topic was exhausted. LOL
Some people just like to pop in and have negative opinions and want to argue. They probably are hen-pecked and can't argue with their mate at home or they may just kick their cat around the room.
I still think Jeff Ashton is an excellent attorney ... DNA testing entered the U.S. legal system in 1987 thanks to Jeff. (Tommy Lee Andrews case Orange Co Florida.)
I didn't think the Ashton topic was exhausted. LOL
Eh, I didnt either. I would like to see it back open again in case something new comes up to maybe prevent even more threads from starting. I do think I'm ready to move away from the whiole Casey Anthony discussion as a whole though. Ive already spent far too much time on it only to come away with total disapointment. Five months later and some of us are still discussing it.....myself included.....
Quote:
Some people just like to pop in and have negative opinions and want to argue.
That be me!!!
Quote:
or they may just kick their cat around the room.
For the sake of all that is holy, save the cat and open the thread again!!!!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
