Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-22-2010, 05:32 AM
 
Location: The western periphery of Terra Australis
24,544 posts, read 56,034,272 times
Reputation: 11862

Advertisements

I know it wouldn't stop may motorists from driving, but seriously, it makes total sense and the arguments against it aren't even worth answering. They're made by selfish capitalists who don't realise everything is CONNECTED. Motorists SHOULD bear some of the burden of trying to help the environment and society because we (yes, I admit I drive, but I live in a rural area where there is zero public transport) are mostly responsible for it. The subsidies needed would not be much...I think this should extend to better health care, childhood development etc for all. I'm sick of this free for all, only concerned about me and my family mentality that the West has invented. If we continue to think like this they'll be less for EVERYONE including our children.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-22-2010, 06:33 AM
 
Location: Niceville, FL
13,258 posts, read 22,826,007 times
Reputation: 16416
It already basically is- typical fares only cover about 20% of the cost of public transportation in most systems.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2010, 09:58 AM
 
8,673 posts, read 17,275,986 times
Reputation: 4685
The middle class stopped riding public transit because it got too inexpensive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2010, 10:26 AM
 
Location: Oak Park, IL
5,525 posts, read 13,944,999 times
Reputation: 3908
Here's an insight and relevant commentary.

The Urbanophile » Blog Archive » Replay: Small Cities Should Have Fareless Transit
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2010, 10:39 AM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,146,737 times
Reputation: 29983
Quote:
Originally Posted by wburg View Post
The middle class stopped riding public transit because it got too inexpensive.
What??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2010, 05:42 PM
 
Location: The western periphery of Terra Australis
24,544 posts, read 56,034,272 times
Reputation: 11862
Quote:
Originally Posted by wburg View Post
The middle class stopped riding public transit because it got too inexpensive.
Lol, aside from that, I find this whole snobby 'public transport is only for people who can't afford cars' attitude really annoying. Well, there you have it, with rising petrol prices you've got what you wanted.

In Europe and Asia you see business execs, doctors and lawyers using public transport (although yes, many of the rich do drive or are chauffered, but many professionals ride public transport and there is certainly no stigma attached to it. Same in Australia).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2010, 05:49 PM
 
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
17,531 posts, read 24,689,422 times
Reputation: 9980
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trimac20 View Post
I know it wouldn't stop may motorists from driving, but seriously, it makes total sense and the arguments against it aren't even worth answering. They're made by selfish capitalists who don't realise everything is CONNECTED. Motorists SHOULD bear some of the burden of trying to help the environment and society because we (yes, I admit I drive, but I live in a rural area where there is zero public transport) are mostly responsible for it. The subsidies needed would not be much...I think this should extend to better health care, childhood development etc for all. I'm sick of this free for all, only concerned about me and my family mentality that the West has invented. If we continue to think like this they'll be less for EVERYONE including our children.
I agree, public transit should be free. Gavin Newson tried to push it through in San Francisco. The cost of collecting and processing fares probably eats up 50% of it anyway
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top