U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
Old 08-24-2014, 05:24 PM
Location: Vancouver
12,703 posts, read 8,775,044 times
Reputation: 7319


Originally Posted by gwillyfromphilly View Post
Looks more like a monorail system like the one in Detroit.
It's not a monorail.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 08-24-2014, 07:10 PM
Location: Vineland, NJ
8,483 posts, read 10,482,128 times
Reputation: 5401
Originally Posted by Natnasci View Post
I know it's not a monorail system. I just said that it looks like a monorail system from the link you posted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 08-28-2014, 09:30 AM
Location: Laurentia
5,593 posts, read 6,386,046 times
Reputation: 2388
If I had to guess I'd say Seattle. They have the density, traffic base, and geography for it more than any other city. I'd also throw out Houston as a possibility - when it grows more and the core steadily densifies subways will become more attractive. One of the big cities in Florida is another possibility, since they have more density and people and less land. If it was growing I'd say Chicago would be the best candidate - frankly, I'm shocked that they never built a subway system considering the size and density of the place. American cities have surprisingly few subway systems, considering the size and density of cities abroad that have subways. You'd think that if cities that aren't that big or dense like Sofia, Helsinki, and Catania could have subways surely any American city bigger and denser than Nashville could.

I tend to agree with the notion that any city with a well-developed transit system and some heavily-used light and/or heavy rail is a great candidate for a new subway system, and short of that not so much. I think the primary problem is a general and systemic lack of will to invest in big projects that will make people's lives and transportation better. Just a third of the current annual military budget, for example, which isn't even equal to the extra post-2001 spending, could fund 1500 miles of new subways.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.

Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top