Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > West Virginia
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-14-2009, 09:18 AM
 
Location: Western Pennsylvania
2,429 posts, read 7,233,956 times
Reputation: 830

Advertisements

Beech Ridge Energy has begun preliminary construction on a 119 turbine, 186 megawatt wind energy project in northern Greenbrier County. The $300 million project is expected to provide about 20 permanent and 200 construction jobs.

While the project has met all PSC requirements, an appeal is expected to be filed by Mountain Communities for Responsible Energy, which claims the adverse economic and environmental effects will outweigh the benefits of the wind turbines.

Complete story at the Pocahontas Times.

Last edited by snorpus; 05-14-2009 at 09:19 AM.. Reason: corrected MCRE URL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-14-2009, 01:10 PM
 
4,714 posts, read 13,309,748 times
Reputation: 1090
This deal was cut last fall...will be on schedule. 3 million a piece? Who's getting the money? ha ha ha
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2009, 08:36 PM
 
13 posts, read 37,461 times
Reputation: 12
I think wind energy is an excellent idea. most Tucker Countians do not believe it is a problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2009, 12:53 AM
 
4,714 posts, read 13,309,748 times
Reputation: 1090
A distinct parallel here..Years ago the fields and hillsides of Wv were dotted with ' auto junkyards and huge satelite dishes.

Now we are begining to create the 'Junkyards of the future.

When these white whirlybirds fall from favor, their companies will bankrupt and leave them to rust into the ground and topple over.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2009, 02:14 PM
 
Location: Limbo
413 posts, read 937,778 times
Reputation: 234
The 'junkyard' created by a wind turbine is a lot less visually unappealing than completely destroying a mountain from the inside out, and then replanting it with fescue and black locust. At least derelict wind turbines will be covered by trees. Denuded mountains... they get covered by invasive species.

Realistically, I do not see sustainable energy 'falling out of favor'. The truth is that eventually, we will be out of fossil fuels. It may not be today, or tomorrow, but some day, there won't be any left. We'll have to find some way to power our gadgets and gizmos other than burning black gold.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2009, 04:06 PM
 
Location: Boilermaker Territory
26,404 posts, read 46,544,081 times
Reputation: 19539
You do realize that technologies are now being developed and implemented to recycle the turbine blades once the lifecycle of the wind farm has ended.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2009, 04:10 PM
 
Location: Western Pennsylvania
2,429 posts, read 7,233,956 times
Reputation: 830
At least with wind turbines, if they don't work out, they can be uninstalled relatively easy. Let's hope somebody thought to get the company to obtain a bond to ensure removal.

Just about any form of energy facility is "ugly", or at least disturbs the pristine appearance of its location. You just have to take your pick. Oil wells and refineries, coal mines and thermal power plants, uranium mines and N-plants, acres and acres of photovoltaic cells, hydrogen, biodiesel, natural gas... I doubt we all want to move entirely off the grid (there goes the Intarweb ), and probably for 90% of the U.S. population, not practical anyway.

Personally, I find the wind towers rather majestic looking, much like, say, a 2-10-4 coal-fired locomotive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2009, 06:02 PM
 
Location: Boilermaker Territory
26,404 posts, read 46,544,081 times
Reputation: 19539
A properly sited wind energy facility is sustainable while mountaintop removal is not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2009, 06:15 PM
 
Location: Limbo
413 posts, read 937,778 times
Reputation: 234
Quote:
Originally Posted by snorpus View Post
Personally, I find the wind towers rather majestic looking, much like, say, a 2-10-4 coal-fired locomotive.
Amen Brotha!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > West Virginia

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top