Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-25-2012, 05:51 PM
 
Location: 31.32' North
97 posts, read 326,661 times
Reputation: 197

Advertisements

Okay, a legal question here.

Say John Doe works for a company and, on his own time, with his own computer, writes a blistering editorial to the local paper, criticizing company policies. Or posts a Facebook status (again, on his on time) ripping them or complaining about his job.

When the boss gets word of it, can he legally fire Mr. Doe for speaking his mind? Does the First Amendment apply?

I've often heard it said that, "You have freedom of speech as far as criticizing the government goes, but you don't have a right to a job with a company."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-25-2012, 06:08 PM
 
1,378 posts, read 4,361,661 times
Reputation: 1767
If Doe is accusing his employer of doing something illegal then he might be protected by whistleblower laws. But if he is just griping about them, they have every right to fire him.

If you owned a company, would you want an employee going out and harming your business? And, yes, the first amendment only protects you from retribution by the government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2012, 06:08 PM
 
2,279 posts, read 3,972,617 times
Reputation: 1669
I'm not really sure a precedence has been set. But I know that my company made us go through a training module that explained that we should be careful what we post on social media.

Honestly, someone will probably sue over it eventually. But with the whole "at will" employment, who knows if they'll get very far. Companies are now allowed to fire without reason.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2012, 06:15 PM
 
173 posts, read 353,836 times
Reputation: 82
Quote:
Originally Posted by Classy Southerner View Post
I've often heard it said that, "You have freedom of speech as far as criticizing the government goes, but you don't have a right to a job with a company."
You know what?

Everybody, no matter what position they are, should take criticism given by anyone, whether they are in charge of them or not.

I find it real ironic how students can't criticize their school teachers, yet they have to go through a scream of butthurt when they do the slightest disrespectful thing that could be solved with a 'please' and 'thank you', or at least with a kind tone.

I'm not talking about, tell them what to do. I'm talking about criticizing the policies and how strict the employer/teacher/administrator is being. The main goal of work is to make students/employees enjoy themselves while at school or work. Like it or not, proper criticism CAN help the business or school become a better place if the manager/teacher/principal gave a flying nosehorn about what students had to say to them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2012, 06:16 PM
 
Location: Marion, IN
8,189 posts, read 31,230,359 times
Reputation: 7344
If the employee is in a right to work state he can be legally fired for any reason or no reason at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2012, 06:35 PM
 
Location: Southern California
3,113 posts, read 8,378,024 times
Reputation: 3721
You bet! There's even a word for it - you got Dooced! The word originated with probably the most famous case for this happening, Heather B. Armstrong of dooce.com. From her About Page...

Quote:
In February 2001, I launched dooce.com as a place to write about pop culture, music, and my life as a single woman. I never expected more than a couple of dozen people to read it. A year later I was fired from my job for this website because I had written stories that included people in my workplace. My advice to you is BE YE NOT SO STUPID. Never write about work on the internet unless your boss knows and sanctions the fact that YOU ARE WRITING ABOUT WORK ON THE INTERNET. If you are the boss, however, you should be aware that when you order Prada online and then talk about it out loud that you are making it very hard for those around you to take you seriously.
About | dooce®
And from Wikipedia...

Quote:
In 2002, Armstrong ignited a fierce debate about privacy issues when she was allegedly fired from her job as a web designer and graphic artist because she had written satirical accounts of her experiences at a dot-com startup on her personal blog, dooce.com.
Quote:
"Dooced" can mean "getting fired for something you've written on your website," a sense supported by the Urban Dictionary,[8] and humorously disavowed by Armstrong in her blog's FAQ.[9] This definition was used by the television game show Jeopardy! on December 10, 2009, as evidenced by a screenshot on her blog the following day.
Heather Armstrong - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2012, 07:09 PM
 
2,279 posts, read 3,972,617 times
Reputation: 1669
Now, I'm just throwing this out there for the sake of argument. People are going with the argument that it's not fair to the business to be criticized, which in turn, could make them lose business. But isn't that essentially what sites like Glassdoor, Yelp, and other miscellaneous review sites allow you to do?

Heck, I just posted a negative review for a dentist that I recently visited on Yelp. Should the dentist be able to come back and sue me for the negative feedback that could potentially harm his business?

I agree that if you're sharing company secrets, then you should be fired, or at the very least, warned and written up. But as far as criticizing a certain process or business practice...don't we do that just about every day, whether it be the poor customer service we received from a restaurant, or the dirty bathrooms at Walmart.

I think, in America, we tend to have a double standard for businesses and individuals. We tend to give businesses a pass on their wrongdoings, because they are looked at as providing more value to society than John Doe. We can bash John Doe all we want on Facebook, but god forbid you say something negative about a company you work for.

Anyway, that's just my two cents. Anyone have something to add to that? Any counter points, something I missed, etc.?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2012, 07:19 PM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
5,725 posts, read 11,712,733 times
Reputation: 9829
Your dentist isn't paying you, your employer is. The employer is going to have a higher level of expectation for people they pay.

I don't see it as first amendment infringement. You're free to say what you want about the company. The first amendment doesn't guarantee that there won't be private, non-governmental consequences for what you say though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2012, 07:30 PM
 
2,279 posts, read 3,972,617 times
Reputation: 1669
Quote:
Originally Posted by maf763 View Post
Your dentist isn't paying you, your employer is. The employer is going to have a higher level of expectation for people they pay.

I don't see it as first amendment infringement. You're free to say what you want about the company. The first amendment doesn't guarantee that there won't be private, non-governmental consequences for what you say though.
True. I suppose if you have a legitimate criticism about employment with a company, you can always go to sites like jobvent or Glassdoor.com. As long as you're not flying off the handle with rude comments about the company, and your criticism is of legitimate concern for someone considering working there, you should be alright.

An example is when I reviewed my last employer on Glassdoor and commented on how there was no room for career growth within the company. That, I would assume, is a legitimate criticism that you could post with no repercussion or consequence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2012, 07:35 PM
 
15,632 posts, read 24,424,443 times
Reputation: 22820
Quote:
Originally Posted by Classy Southerner View Post
Does the First Amendment apply?


"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

As stated above, the First Amendment guarantees people five rights: religion, speech, press, assembly and petition.

Regarding speech, the First Amendment guarantees people the right to speak freely without government interference.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top