Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-27-2014, 07:16 PM
 
7,237 posts, read 12,744,223 times
Reputation: 5669

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by RVD90277 View Post
I have nothing but respect for Ben Bernanke. He is recognized as one of the world's best authorities on the great depression so if he says that 2008 was worse, then it was worse.

But at least from my perspective, 2008's recession only lasted a few months. The great depression lasted something like 10 years right?

I was in school getting my MBA in 2008 and my economics Professor was a personal friend and colleague with Ben Bernanke (they co-wrote the textbook that I studied in that class). My professor said that he was visiting Washington DC and on the ground there was a bronze engraving commemorating some fallen soldiers and it said that they died in "THE WORLD WAR."

He said that he was a bit confused as he wondered if that was WWI or WWII? He then realized that it had to be WWI because at the time the engraving was made, there had only been one world war.

He said that in 2008 to say "hopefully in a few decades we don't look back to 2008 and refer to this as The Great Depression II"...

I think we're due for another big fall...but I've been saying that for at least the past year and I've been wrong.
As far as the bolded, that is technically incorrect.

By the official definition, a recession is two or more consecutive quarters of GDP decline. After the decline began in 1928-1929, the GDP was already rising (thanks to New Deal spending) by 1932-1933.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-27-2014, 09:51 PM
 
Location: Berwick, Penna.
16,216 posts, read 11,338,692 times
Reputation: 20828
Quote:
Originally Posted by 313Weather View Post
What a bunch of revisionist crap!!!

And it's funny that you reference David Stockman to back yourself up, the same guy who was once a huge shill for Reagan's "voodoo economics" who has now come out and completely trashed Reaganomics for the foolishness it is/was...
Proving one thing .... unlike most of the Democrats' pointing, grunting robots, Stockman thinks independently!

He has also advocated continuing the "safety net" ... but with a means test, BTW.

It is the people in Left Field who sink to stereotypes and a blind pursuit of power.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2014, 10:50 AM
 
Location: TN/NC
35,077 posts, read 31,313,313 times
Reputation: 47550
It is worse in some senses. Back then, many rural folks lived off the land and didn't have much in the way of material worth anyway. Today, those rural folks are out of work, with no way to take care of basic expenses, and are often stuck on government assistance. Most people also weren't leveraged to the hilt like they are today.

The flip side of this is people have been largely kept out of terrifying poverty and starvation due to social assistance programs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2014, 10:51 AM
 
2,064 posts, read 4,435,743 times
Reputation: 1468
Quote:
Originally Posted by 313Weather View Post
As far as the bolded, that is technically incorrect.

By the official definition, a recession is two or more consecutive quarters of GDP decline. After the decline began in 1928-1929, the GDP was already rising (thanks to New Deal spending) by 1932-1933.
you're probably right on the official definition.

i guess i was referring to general sentiment and how long it took to get back up to pre-1929 levels.

The Great Depression (1929-1939)

seems like in 2008 we bounced back rather quickly and today stock markets are at record levels, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2014, 11:00 AM
 
Location: Florida
4,103 posts, read 5,427,707 times
Reputation: 10111
Quote:
Originally Posted by RVD90277 View Post
I have nothing but respect for Ben Bernanke. He is recognized as one of the world's best authorities on the great depression so if he says that 2008 was worse, then it was worse.

But at least from my perspective, 2008's recession only lasted a few months. The great depression lasted something like 10 years right?

I was in school getting my MBA in 2008 and my economics Professor was a personal friend and colleague with Ben Bernanke (they co-wrote the textbook that I studied in that class). My professor said that he was visiting Washington DC and on the ground there was a bronze engraving commemorating some fallen soldiers and it said that they died in "THE WORLD WAR."

He said that he was a bit confused as he wondered if that was WWI or WWII? He then realized that it had to be WWI because at the time the engraving was made, there had only been one world war.

He said that in 2008 to say "hopefully in a few decades we don't look back to 2008 and refer to this as The Great Depression II"...

I think we're due for another big fall...but I've been saying that for at least the past year and I've been wrong.
Really......you have nothing but respect for the man who was at the helm during the 2008 recession......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2014, 11:17 AM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 36,974,024 times
Reputation: 40635
A two to three month recession is not worse than a depression.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2014, 11:49 AM
 
Location: Las Vegas, NV
352 posts, read 324,791 times
Reputation: 816
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vannort54 View Post
My parents lived during the great depression, there was no unemployment , no free medical clinics. There were soup lines and homeless camps setup all over the place. My mother told me that things were so bad that she ate lard sanwitches. Also there was no help in paying your gas or electric bill. My grandfather use to bring home coal that fell off the trains boxcar so he could keep his family warm. So please don't tell this story to the people that lived through the great depression. Because at least there is unemployment and foid stamps during the slowdown of 2008. They had nothing back then.
This.

Did we see bread lines during 2008-2009?
Did we see unemployment rates over 25%?
Did we have "Bushvilles" like they had "Hoovervilles"?

No.

Did it last for years?

No. By March of 2009, the economy began to recover.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2014, 12:18 PM
 
5,616 posts, read 15,521,566 times
Reputation: 2824
Please this 2008 was no where near as bad as the Great Depression. My father told me such horror stories. People would go into a dining establishment and order hot water. Then they would add ketchup and salt (free on the table) and make tomato soup. It was a picture that no one could imagine today!! Lines and lines of people looking for food and work. Suicide thru the roof. It was terrible from the real stories I hear. This recession had so many safety nets, extensions of beneftis and bailouts. NO way!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2014, 01:38 PM
 
Location: Candy Kingdom
5,155 posts, read 4,623,048 times
Reputation: 6629
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevemorse View Post
Please this 2008 was no where near as bad as the Great Depression. My father told me such horror stories. People would go into a dining establishment and order hot water. Then they would add ketchup and salt (free on the table) and make tomato soup. It was a picture that no one could imagine today!! Lines and lines of people looking for food and work. Suicide thru the roof. It was terrible from the real stories I hear. This recession had so many safety nets, extensions of beneftis and bailouts. NO way!!
I agree. I mean, people lost things in 2008, but not at the same intensity. I think if we have a few more, then MAYBE. I really hope we don't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2014, 01:48 PM
 
1,161 posts, read 1,312,339 times
Reputation: 872
Quote:
Originally Posted by jessxwrites89 View Post
I agree. I mean, people lost things in 2008, but not at the same intensity. I think if we have a few more, then MAYBE. I really hope we don't.

I didn't read the statements by Bernie, but I could see why he was saying what he was saying.

The underlying problems themselves may have been worse than what caused the Great Depression but at least we had a safety net to lessen the pain and suffering of the masses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:31 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top