Should promotions/raises be based on Seniority or skills? (employee, jobs, company)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Obviously it should be skills but realistically for some jobs, it doesn't always work.
I have one friend who is a cop. He's not very old and he makes good income (6 figures) but his rank isn't really high up because as he put it "no 40 year old cop is going to take orders from a 25 year old guy no matter how skilled I am."
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,572 posts, read 81,167,557 times
Reputation: 57803
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rabrrita
It should be based on the value an employee provides to the company. There is more to this than just "seniority" and/or "skill".
I agree, and that's why ours are based on an annual performance review. There are still union public agencies that have "step" increases based on time there, for example, raises at 6 months, 18 months and 36 months, but they usually also have an annual cost of living increase. The idea of that was that a person gains experience and skills and can perform better after being on the job longer, but that's not always the case.
It absolutely should be given based on skills and job performance. Hands down!
Seniority should only be applied as a "tiebreaker" between two people who perform equally.
I've found that experience doesn't always translate to good workmanship.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.