Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-04-2016, 05:36 PM
 
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
29,813 posts, read 24,895,387 times
Reputation: 28505

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BobNJ1960 View Post
Babysit tells me the type of places which hire you.


Professional environments require no babysitters.
So how come you guys can't pay +$25/hr for your labor?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-04-2016, 07:39 PM
 
34,021 posts, read 17,050,952 times
Reputation: 17187
Quote:
Originally Posted by andywire View Post
So how come you guys can't pay +$25/hr for your labor?

Don't need to. Supply and demand sets every wage. The rarer the skill, the more you make.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2016, 08:10 PM
 
7,977 posts, read 4,984,909 times
Reputation: 15951
Without a shadow of a doubt. Work is a social club today (Where connections trump things that SHOULD matter like value, knowledge, ability etc) and generally when certain managers take over they bring their crew of butt sniffers with them and surround themselves with them. If you expose these inept managers as useless voids in business, you'll be deemed an IMMEDIATE Threat and ostracized.

If there is anything insecure, useless management teams hate, its workers with ability who get things done and need no supervision and show their true value and show the ineptness and uselessness of said management.

For any ONE good legitimate manager in the private sector today, theres 20 human sacks of snake feces that shouldn't even be in those positions. They do nothing positive for a workplace and cause costly turnover rates.

I still can't believe employers overlook constant, costly turnover rates today. How can you put blinders on to this when you consider how costly it is for your company and all the talent that could be lost? Thats just money being thrown out the door or burned in a trash. Idiots

Last edited by DorianRo; 08-04-2016 at 08:29 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2016, 08:42 PM
 
Location: TN/NC
35,057 posts, read 31,278,237 times
Reputation: 47514
At my current employer, senior management (SVP and CEO) really do seem to "get it." Middle management to line level staff is where the screw ups occur.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2016, 10:15 PM
 
Location: Garbage, NC
3,125 posts, read 3,021,876 times
Reputation: 8246
I actually think things can be tough for middle management.

They have to answer to upper management for employees' screw-ups.

They have to empathize with employees for management's screw-ups or jerkiness.

Kind of a tough spot to be in..."above the below but below the upper...stuck in the middle where money gets tight..."

(And anyone who thinks that money doesn't can't get tight at "$25 an hour" (post #11)...well...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2016, 11:14 PM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,725,973 times
Reputation: 14745
Quote:
Originally Posted by andywire View Post
It seems like management does not understand the work being done at many companies I have worked for. They are completely in the dark, have no interest in learning, and are often very lazy and unmotivated. Many of them have a difficult time controlling their emotions. Some are real whiny and wouldn't last a day doing a real job.

I never had any real trouble working with management. They are just people trying to make a living too I assume. But it seems like when the ratio of management to worker grows, the work environments get worse.

Do companies have a tendency to just take all the useless people and make them managers?
Many companies , yes.

Most? I don't know. I will say some are better than others.

Overall, my feeling is that individuals in management are , like most workers, mostly concerned about maximizing their personal compensation and minimizing personal risks.

Executives as benevolent, enlightened rulers is kind of a fantasy. Many of them are just good at BS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2016, 11:18 PM
 
Location: Kirkland, WA (Metro Seattle)
6,033 posts, read 6,144,564 times
Reputation: 12529
Quote:
Originally Posted by andywire View Post
LOL. Hit a nerve?

I have been offered management positions before. I don't come to work to babysit though. Not for me, thank you.
Well, that's fine. Look, I'm not picking a fight, this is a discussion board and not the schoolyard, but I "am" a pretty senior manager, in IT. But I'm joining others in asking: what is the question? You don't want to manage, so all managers are halfwits (my interpretation of earlier comments)? It doesn't sound like there is one. Hitting a nerve, in the sense of poo-pooing what managers do? You bet, I'm feeling it too at least a little. Your mission(?) is accomplished, I suppose.

I wrote code, mostly server scripts, and worked in labs for years. That was line-level work, requiring skills more than ability to abstract and think strategically. Doing that, I had few responsibilities. I wouldn't call it piecemeal; keeping the ball rolling in the bowels of Microsoft Corporation was the beginning and end of the work. If it (whatever "it" was) worked and I was liked, all was good. If it broke, I and others were yelled at. Period.

There are useless managers. In some companies, they seem to roll right along. I tend to believe OP that he's observed more than a few.

However, I guaranty that there are managers who bust their buns. I'm not having a Christ Complex moment...promise...but as a Sr. manager in IT, my job is pretty much on-call various hours of the day, 5-6 days/week, and there is no standard workday. I have offshore teams in Australia and India. I am in Seattle (PST). I'm on a call right now, my development lead is speaking with offshore, but it's after 10pm and will go on another 45 minutes or so with my lead and offshore doing most of the talking and coding. I'm steering them along and keeping the conversation on-point with our strategic priorities, and deciding what we'll do with what resources we have. That's pretty much 3-5 nights per week, plus a long day of tons of email and making decisions with $$ ramifications all day, and leading/coaching/mentoring teams and individuals.

It's stressful work, guy. Call me rude, but yes we're well paid, and we earn it or we're terminated. And we're under major stress, from the GM on down, as a mid-size business in a ruthless ecosystem where only the most efficient survive. All leadership, and the outer circle managers (like me), have P&L plus other metrics we *must* meet. If we don't, well, do the math and there goes a well-paying IT job.

To be clear, the rewards are equally lavish. That's the point: we work hard, we play hard, we sometimes crash hard, and sometimes we need to move on or be managed out the door.

And...?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2016, 05:29 AM
 
7,977 posts, read 4,984,909 times
Reputation: 15951
Companies have an awful habit of promoting the most useless up the chain while leaving the best qualified individuals where they are at which only breeds problems. In 10 years never seen anything good come of it

Not only are you putting know nothing idiots in charge of things (who only got the job because they were buddy buddy with someone or the hiring a managers were too lazy to get anyone else trained/up to speed) you are only making the top performers more disgruntled and they will either: leave or eventually just become clock punchers

Anyone that engages in this type of hiring practiced should be fired on the spot. Hell if it was up to me they would be fined and jailed for 6 months. It's BS. It happens to often today and only damages/hurts the company from many angles (financially, operationally etc)

Just over the last 10 years I have already seen two facilities go under because of engaging in this BS practice
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2016, 05:33 AM
 
Location: Over yonder a piece
4,270 posts, read 6,295,785 times
Reputation: 7144
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pitt Chick View Post
Yeah, that is exactly how every company is... all around the globe.

OP, is there something specific that prompted this thread?
Wish I could rep you but it won't let me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2016, 05:37 AM
 
5,907 posts, read 4,429,414 times
Reputation: 13442
Quote:
fined and jailed for 6 months
Seems reasonable
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top