Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Thread summary:

Tobacco addiction: insurance costs, smoking shelter,

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-27-2008, 04:35 PM
 
Location: USA
4,978 posts, read 9,512,277 times
Reputation: 2506

Advertisements

I had to agree to this piece of garbage on an application.
How childish.
Do I smoke? NO.....

They just want to keep their insurance premiums low. Next, they won't hire any coffee drinkers, alcohol consumers (you guys watch out, you're next), obese people. All cause the price of insurance to go up. Yep, that nice glass of wine you have at home can be monitored by a random check at work. That is what they are doing with smoking now. They have random checks and if you have nicotine in your blood, you are out. Doesn't matter if the person smoked at home.
Wait till they go after alcohol, motorcycling, obesity. Brave New World.

I edited out the name of the place...funny it doesn't mention marijuana, but I guess that would fall under the drug screen.

NOTICE OF OUR ANTI-SMOKING AND TOBACCO PRODUCTS POLICY In furtherance of our mission, , LLC () is a smoke and tobacco-free employer. Smoking and use of tobacco products (including cigarettes, pipes, cigars, chewing tobacco, snuff, clove cigarettes and similar products -- collectively, Tobacco Products) are prohibited at all facilities. In addition, employees are prohibited from smoking or otherwise using Tobacco Products at any time while employed by , whether on or off-duty and regardless of whether they are at our facilities or elsewhere. The smelling of smoke or the possession of Tobacco Products will be presumptive evidence that the employee has or intends to violate this policy. Employees who use or possess Tobacco Products or who smell of smoke are subject to discipline, including without limitation, termination of employment If you are a smoker or otherwise use Tobacco Products, do not apply to work at . By signing this application, you are certifying that you are not a smoker or other user of Tobacco Products and that you agree to comply with 's policies relating to smoking and tobacco use while employed by us. You also are certifying that your answers to the following questions are truthful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-27-2008, 04:42 PM
 
Location: Sanford, FL
732 posts, read 4,157,100 times
Reputation: 405
What if you didnt smoke when you filled out the app but later became a smoker. Would they fire you for lieing?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2008, 05:15 PM
 
Location: USA
4,978 posts, read 9,512,277 times
Reputation: 2506
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fnix View Post
What if you didnt smoke when you filled out the app but later became a smoker. Would they fire you for lieing?

This place, and I have interviewed at other places who do the same....will randomly select workers and have them submit to a test.

You won't know when you're going to be picked, so the idea is you have to be clean all the time.

If you started smoking, and got picked for a random test, you'd be terminated. Even if you only smoked at home...they are looking for nicotine in the blood.

The excuse is that nicotine is an addictive substance, but really, so is caffeine. They might claim it's for your own benefit, but we all know they aren't doing this to be nice. They are spending a lot of money in laboratory fees to test people, so the pay off with insurance premiums must be big.

Why don't they just be honest with people and say that? They want us to be honest with them!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2008, 06:38 PM
 
9,238 posts, read 22,890,741 times
Reputation: 22699
It's not that nicotine is addictive. It's because it is linked (for better or worse) to cancer and other chronic health conditions that do cost employers a substantial amount of money, especially if they self-insure.
Also, people who smoke take an average 3-4 smoking breaks a day, which amounts to about an hour of decreased productivity. I can go get a coffee, and continue working at my desk within 1 minute. But smokers are outside for at least 10 minutes each time, and it's usually about 20-25 minutes, when you include getting the cigarette, getting your coat, telling people you're going for a smoke, taking the elevator downstairs, walking outside, etc.

I agree that I don't like "Big Brother" and "Brave New World" stuff. But if you remember correctly, in these stories, it wasn't a private employer breaking into personal lives, but the government. I still have to fall in support of private employers, who are private citizens like all of us, who need to run a business and cut costs where they can, in order to stay in business and pay people, and not lay people off.

In a few states, smokers are a protected class, meaning they cannot be discriminated against. So in those places smoking status is protected just like race, sex, religion, etc. But in the majority of states, it's perfectly legal. I agree that if I were a smoker it would tick me off, but it's still legal.

If you were an employer, like a small business owner, and the government was telling you that you could not hire, or must hire smokers, you'd also think this was the "Brave New World."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2008, 08:18 PM
 
Location: USA
4,978 posts, read 9,512,277 times
Reputation: 2506
Quote:
Originally Posted by TracySam View Post
It's not that nicotine is addictive. It's because it is linked (for better or worse) to cancer and other chronic health conditions that do cost employers a substantial amount of money, especially if they self-insure.
Also, people who smoke take an average 3-4 smoking breaks a day, which amounts to about an hour of decreased productivity. I can go get a coffee, and continue working at my desk within 1 minute. But smokers are outside for at least 10 minutes each time, and it's usually about 20-25 minutes, when you include getting the cigarette, getting your coat, telling people you're going for a smoke, taking the elevator downstairs, walking outside, etc.

I agree that I don't like "Big Brother" and "Brave New World" stuff. But if you remember correctly, in these stories, it wasn't a private employer breaking into personal lives, but the government. I still have to fall in support of private employers, who are private citizens like all of us, who need to run a business and cut costs where they can, in order to stay in business and pay people, and not lay people off.

In a few states, smokers are a protected class, meaning they cannot be discriminated against. So in those places smoking status is protected just like race, sex, religion, etc. But in the majority of states, it's perfectly legal. I agree that if I were a smoker it would tick me off, but it's still legal.

If you were an employer, like a small business owner, and the government was telling you that you could not hire, or must hire smokers, you'd also think this was the "Brave New World."

Actually, these moves are generated by money interests, not concerns for potential employees' health.
These companies are not paying out lab bills out of the kindness of their hearts and then canning people. Don't say they care about people they haven't even hired...don't even go there.

I don't smoke, but this is the United States of America, and I support the right of an individual to do what they want in their own home. Nicotine is not illegal. So, if you support this, you must support not hiring obese people, people who use alcohol, ad nauseum........so many things can bring about disease.

Yes, companies can do what they like, but it doesn't make it right. And it is creating this horrible work ethic and environment out there.

Most aren't allowing any smoking in their parking lots, let alone cigarette breaks. This has to do with people not being allowed to smoke on their own time at home, etc.

So while you support a company's right to intrude into what someone does at home, I support the individual, because this is what this country was founded on, not the love of money.

Live free or die.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2008, 08:25 PM
 
Location: SW Missouri
15,852 posts, read 35,124,373 times
Reputation: 22695
Quote:
Originally Posted by nebulous1 View Post
I had to agree to this piece of garbage on an application.
How childish.
Do I smoke? NO.....

They just want to keep their insurance premiums low. Next, they won't hire any coffee drinkers, alcohol consumers (you guys watch out, you're next), obese people. All cause the price of insurance to go up. Yep, that nice glass of wine you have at home can be monitored by a random check at work. That is what they are doing with smoking now. They have random checks and if you have nicotine in your blood, you are out. Doesn't matter if the person smoked at home.
Wait till they go after alcohol, motorcycling, obesity. Brave New World.

I edited out the name of the place...funny it doesn't mention marijuana, but I guess that would fall under the drug screen.

NOTICE OF OUR ANTI-SMOKING AND TOBACCO PRODUCTS POLICY In furtherance of our mission, , LLC () is a smoke and tobacco-free employer. Smoking and use of tobacco products (including cigarettes, pipes, cigars, chewing tobacco, snuff, clove cigarettes and similar products -- collectively, Tobacco Products) are prohibited at all facilities. In addition, employees are prohibited from smoking or otherwise using Tobacco Products at any time while employed by , whether on or off-duty and regardless of whether they are at our facilities or elsewhere. The smelling of smoke or the possession of Tobacco Products will be presumptive evidence that the employee has or intends to violate this policy. Employees who use or possess Tobacco Products or who smell of smoke are subject to discipline, including without limitation, termination of employment If you are a smoker or otherwise use Tobacco Products, do not apply to work at . By signing this application, you are certifying that you are not a smoker or other user of Tobacco Products and that you agree to comply with 's policies relating to smoking and tobacco use while employed by us. You also are certifying that your answers to the following questions are truthful.
Apparently, these people have never been to a bowling alley, bingo parlour, casino or bar. You cannot visit any one of these establishments without reeking of cigarette smoke. Moreover, what if your significant other is a smoker - how do you avoid the smell then.

Man these people are mondo unreasonable. There are plenty of ways to smell like smoke without actually smoking. Does that mean also that if you are buying a pipe for your father in law for Christmas and you meet a co-worker at the store who rats on you that you are "in possession of tobacco products?" Give me a break.

I just wouldn't work for a company like this. Sorry.

20yrsinBranson
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2008, 08:32 PM
 
Location: Midwest
799 posts, read 2,168,577 times
Reputation: 216
Quote:
Originally Posted by 20yrsinBranson View Post
Apparently, these people have never been to a bowling alley, bingo parlour, casino or bar. You cannot visit any one of these establishments without reeking of cigarette smoke. Moreover, what if your significant other is a smoker - how do you avoid the smell then.

Man these people are mondo unreasonable. There are plenty of ways to smell like smoke without actually smoking. Does that mean also that if you are buying a pipe for your father in law for Christmas and you meet a co-worker at the store who rats on you that you are "in possession of tobacco products?" Give me a break.

I just wouldn't work for a company like this. Sorry.

20yrsinBranson
More and more are doing this...it really isn't about smoking...it is about insurance costs. I read one company saves about $1000 a year per employee by not hiring smokers.
Obesity and alcohol really cause a lot of diseases. Heart disease, stroke, diabetes....really easy to flush out a diabetic with a urine test.

Just wait, it is going to get worse before it gets better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2008, 05:51 AM
 
Location: Cold Frozen North
1,928 posts, read 5,165,196 times
Reputation: 1307
So much for individual freedoms.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2008, 08:58 AM
 
Location: Western NY
559 posts, read 1,394,600 times
Reputation: 570
At my job the smokers used to be able to smoke right outside of the building. Now they have to smoke a certain number of feet away from the building (the company provides umbrellas for them - the umbrellas are in a bin by the back door), or they can smoke closer to the building if they're inside of a vehicle.

HR wants to eventually make this a smoke-free workplace. I don't know if the smokers are going to have to start smoking across the street or what.

Maybe next they'll stop people from bringing in donuts, brownies, cake, etc. Who knows.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2008, 09:47 AM
 
25 posts, read 89,722 times
Reputation: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by nebulous1 View Post
In addition, employees are prohibited from smoking or otherwise using Tobacco Products at any time while employed by , whether on or off-duty and regardless of whether they are at our facilities or elsewhere.
Is that even legal?
I’d say don’t work for this company unless you have to, and even if you do, just keep looking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top