Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
LOL ok whatever, you must've forgotten that us British can just fly over the ocean and hit you then.
Hah-you're a riot.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Astorian31
The UK is every bit the warmonger the US is.
The difference is the US has the power to go through with it, while the UK relies on the US to do the job for them. Latest example, The UK wanted a military strike in Syria, the US said it wouldn't help them, and the UK backed down.
Canada will never join the UK in a war against the US, and the combined forces of the EU still wont be a match against the military power of the US
Both would be smouldering, radioactive ruins. It would end as a draw.
Nuking would not only affect the warring countries, but the global climate as a whole. Ash would block the sun's rays if enough got into the atmosphere. Crop production would effect many countries due to this effect. Nukes are just not an economically acute decision.
The UK would win because we have virtually every European country on our side and also the commonwealth of nations (Canada, Australia, New Zealand etc) and because the US normally starts the wars so virtually the whole world would be in Britain's side.
Though you know the French are just going to back out or change sides once the war starts up...
And the Spanish will want too much in return to join the fight and the Italians will lose a few battles and go home. The Germans can fight, but they might go a different direction(watch out Poland).
You guys are starting to sound like the kids on YouTube who jerk off over WWIII simulation videos.
You do know the whole premise of his thread is ridiculous, right? Lighten up, we're just having some fun with a ridiculous hypothetical situation. (We all know the UK is our ***** and will never dare lift a finger agiainst until we start taxing them without representation. )
You do know the whole premise of his thread is ridiculous, right? Lighten up, we're just having some fun with a ridiculous hypothetical situation. (We all know the UK is our ***** and will never dare lift a finger agiainst until we start taxing them without representation. )
Sadly i think the original poster was being serious when he made this.
just look at the original post, not one emoticon
All I know is that if the price of tea goes up...we're blaming the Brits again and going to war.
First target... The British Virgin Islands. It's time to unite the long divided Virgin Islanders and take those beautiful beaches and coves for Uncle Sam. Next up, the Caymans and Turks and Caicos.
You mean other than every time "The Star-Spangled Banner" gets sung or played?
Good point! Also keeping the USS Constitution and the heavily rebuilt USS Niagara as museum ships. Still I think that many Americans do not know what war the Star-Spangled Banner is from. And its probably good thing given the state of the American educational system that its called the War of 1812!
Anyway IMO the War of 1812 is greatly overshadowed in America by the American Revolution, the Civil War and WW2.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
