Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Okay thanks, but I think Michael Connelly is different than what I am going for cause he writes detective novels where as I am writing a revenge thriller, so the revenge aspects would be concentrated on a lot more, compared to the detective aspects, wouldn't they?
Okay thanks, but I think Michael Connelly is different than what I am going for cause he writes detective novels where as I am writing a revenge thriller, so the revenge aspects would be concentrated on a lot more, compared to the detective aspects, wouldn't they?
Okay thanks. It's hard to know how much detail I need though. Like for example, in the movie The Departed
SPOILER
The villains throw the police captain off a roof of a building, in full view of other cops who were surveying them. And then the police act like they were suckered again, and the villains got away with it.
Apparently, all you need to do to get away with murdering a police captain, is throwing him off a roof a building and that's it. No more explanation needed. So I am very confused as to how much the reader expects there.
I think it's very important to include "forensic detail" in crime thrillers.
It makes for a better read in my opinion, and makes the story more [real] for the reader.
Okay sure, I can do that. I thought if I went to much into detail, it makes the story more complicated and I need to trim the fat so to speak, but I can try to strike a balance or even have more detail in then.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.