Alexandria Avenue Elementary School in Los Angeles, CA
(KG-05 • Public • Regular School)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in California) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 16
- Address
- 4211 Oakwood Ave.
Los Angeles, CA 90004
- Telephone
- (323) 660-1936
(make sure to verify first before calling)
- City-data.com school rating
- 16
- Students
- 753
- Classroom Teachers (FTE)
- 30.0
- National School Lunch
Program (NSLP) Status - Yes, under Provision 2
- Free lunch eligible students
- 630
- Reduced-price lunch
eligible students - 62
- School district
- Los Angeles Unified
- Charter school
- No
- Title I status
- Title I schoolwide school
- Magnet School Indicator
- No
- Shared Time Indicator
- Missing
- Adult education offered
- No
No street view available for this location
Ratings
This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
Alexandria Avenue Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:California: | 46 |
Los Angeles County: | 44 |
Los Angeles: | 36 |
Alexandria Avenue Elementary: | 16 |
Students & Teachers
Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 753
Enrollment in 2015: 709
Enrollment in 2014: 709
Enrollment in 2013: 712
Enrollment in 2012: 794
Enrollment in 2011: 775
Enrollment in 2010: 889
Enrollment in 2009: 909
Enrollment in 2008: 1,021
Enrollment in 2007: 1,139
Enrollment in 2006: 1,323
Enrollment in 2005: 1,801
Enrollment in 2004: 1,850
Enrollment in 2003: 1,871
Enrollment in 2002: 1,805
Enrollment in 2001: 1,718
Enrollment in 2000: 1,648
Enrollment in 1999: 1,592
Alexandria Avenue Elementary School - Historical enrollment
Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
Grade | KG | G01 | G02 | G03 | G04 | G05 | Total |
---|
All students | 139 | 126 | 126 | 103 | 140 | 119 | 753 |
Female students | 62 | 69 | 64 | 48 | 66 | 59 | 368 |
Male students | 77 | 57 | 62 | 55 | 74 | 60 | 385 |
Asian students | 8 | 11 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 44 |
Hispanic students | 127 | 100 | 115 | 91 | 131 | 109 | 673 |
Black students | 1 | - | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 9 |
White students | 2 | 9 | 2 | 1 | - | - | 14 |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | - | 7 |
Two or More Races students | - | 5 | 1 | - | - | - | 6 |
Enrollment by grade:
Kindergarten enrollment: 139
1st grade enrollment: 126
2nd grade enrollment: 126
3rd grade enrollment: 103
4th grade enrollment: 140
5th grade enrollment: 119
Alexandria Avenue Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade
Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
Female enrollment: 368 (48.9%)School: | 48.9% |
California: | 49.4% |
Male enrollment: 385 (51.1%)Here: | 51.1% |
California: | 49.6% |
Alexandria Avenue Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender
Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
Asian enrollment: 44 (5.8%)Alexandria Avenue Elementary School: | 5.8% |
State: | 9.4% |
Hispanic enrollment: 673 (89.4%)Alexandria Avenue Elementary School: | 89.4% |
California: | 46.0% |
Black enrollment: 9 (1.2%)School: | 1.2% |
California: | 6.1% |
White enrollment: 14 (1.9%)Alexandria Avenue Elementary School: | 1.9% |
State: | 28.3% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 7 (0.9%)Alexandria Avenue Elementary School: | 0.9% |
State: | 0.6% |
Two or More Races enrollment: 6 (0.8%)
Alexandria Avenue Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity
Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 10,111 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 692 (91.9%)School: | 91.9% |
California: | 61.2% |
Free lunch eligible students: 630 (83.7%)Alexandria Avenue Elementary School: | 83.7% |
California: | 52.8% |
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 62 (8.2%)
Alexandria Avenue Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility
Teachers and support:
(State average from 12,394 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 30
Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE school counselors: 2
Number of FTE sworn law enforcement officers: 1
Number of FTE nurses: 2
Number of FTE psychologists: 3
Number of FTE social workers: 1
Student/Teacher RatioAlexandria Avenue Elementary School: | 25.1 |
State: | 22.8 |
Alexandria Avenue Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio
School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds:
$3,119,920- Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 29.2 (Salary Expenditures: $2,554,739)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 4.2 (Salary Expenditures: $61,604)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 1.8 (Salary Expenditures: $201,114)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 4.5 (Salary Expenditures: $302,463)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds:
$180,743Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,:
$4,113,642- Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $3,051,863
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 18 (Salary Expenditures: $333,140)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 2.5 (Salary Expenditures: $379,482)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 4.5 (Salary Expenditures: $349,156)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds:
$237,509 Limited English Proficiency:
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs
- Hispanic340
- Asian19
- Native Hawaiian5
- White4
- Multirace5
- IDEA37
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 373 (male: 200, female: 173)
- Hispanic: 340 (male: 182, female: 158)
- Asian: 19 (male: 11, female: 8)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 5 (all male)
- White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Two or More Races: 5 (all female)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 37 (male: 29, female: 8)
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs
- Hispanic418
- American Indian2
- Asian16
- Native Hawaiian4
- White4
- IDEA49
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 444 (male: 220, female: 224)
- Hispanic: 418 (male: 209, female: 209)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
- Asian: 16 (male: 5, female: 11)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 49 (male: 41, female: 8)
Students with disabilities:
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.
Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 57 (male: 43, female: 14)
- Hispanic: 53 (male: 43, female: 10)
- Asian: 4 (all female)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 47 (male: 34, female: 13)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 59 (male: 49, female: 10)
- Hispanic: 59 (male: 49, female: 10)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 47 (male: 40, female: 7)
Retention:
(State average from 2,659 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Percent of Kindergarten students retained
Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- White: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)
Percent of 1st grade students retained
Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Percent of 2nd grade students retainedAlexandria Avenue Elementary School: | 1.6% |
State: | 2.9% |
Total number of students retained in 3rd grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Percent of 3rd grade students retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 2 (all male)
- White: 2 (all female)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
Percent of Kindergarten students retainedAlexandria Avenue Elementary School: | 2.9% |
State: | 5.6% |
Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Percent of 1st grade students retainedAlexandria Avenue Elementary School: | 3.2% |
State: | 5.5% |
Total number of students retained in 3rd grade: 4 (all male)
- Hispanic: 2
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 2
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Percent of 3rd grade students retainedSchool: | 3.9% |
California: | 3.4% |
Gifted and Talented:
(State average from 5,551 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment
- Hispanic43
- Asian2
- Black2
- LEP7
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 47 (male: 17, female: 30)
- Hispanic: 43 (male: 17, female: 26)
- Asian: 2 (all female)
- Black: 2 (all female)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 studentsAlexandria Avenue Elementary School: | 62.4 |
California: | 84.3 |
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment
- Hispanic43
- Asian7
- White2
- LEP4
- IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 52 (male: 27, female: 25)
- Hispanic: 43 (male: 23, female: 20)
- Asian: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
- White: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all female)
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 studentsSchool: | 69.1 |
California: | 93.6 |
Statewide Student Assessments
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments:
(State average from 10,463 schools)
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments (SB) is one of the online summative assessments - part of California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System.
The summative assessments are comprehensive, end-of-year assessments of grade-level learning that measure progress toward college and career readiness. Each test in English language arts/literacy (ELA) and mathematics is comprised of two parts: (1) a computer-adaptive test and (2) a performance task, administered within a selected testing window available at 66 percent of the instructional year for grades three through eight, and grade eleven.
The summative assessments are aligned with the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for ELA and mathematics. The tests capitalize on the strengths of computer adaptive testing efficient and precise measurement across the full range of achievement and timely turnaround of results.
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All27%
- Males18%
- Females35%
- Hispanic25%
ELA students tested: 342
ELA students with scores: 341
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 27% |
State: | 49% |
Standard Not Met:
52.8%Standard Nearly Met:
20.5%Standard Met:
17.6%Standard Exceeded:
9.1%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2377.5, Students tested: 117, Standard Not Met: 53.5%, Nearly Met: 22.4%, Met: 12.9%, Exceeded: 11.2%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2414.5, Students tested: 93, Standard Not Met: 53.8%, Nearly Met: 19.4%, Met: 14.0%, Exceeded: 12.9%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2443.2, Students tested: 132, Standard Not Met: 51.5%, Nearly Met: 19.7%, Met: 24.2%, Exceeded: 4.5%)Alexandria Avenue Elementary School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All21%
- Males18%
- Females23%
- Hispanic19%
Math students tested: 354
Math students with scores: 353
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 21% |
State: | 38% |
Standard Not Met:
53.8%Standard Nearly Met:
25.5%Standard Met:
14.2%Standard Exceeded:
6.5%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2387.8, Students tested: 121, Standard Not Met: 48.3%, Nearly Met: 24.2%, Met: 18.3%, Exceeded: 9.2%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2424.2, Students tested: 99, Standard Not Met: 46.5%, Nearly Met: 27.3%, Met: 15.2%, Exceeded: 11.1%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2429.4, Students tested: 134, Standard Not Met: 64.2%, Nearly Met: 25.4%, Met: 9.7%, Exceeded: 0.8%)Alexandria Avenue Elementary School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All24%
- Males15%
- Females34%
- Hispanic22%
ELA students tested: 350
ELA students with scores: 350
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 24% |
California: | 48% |
Standard Not Met:
56.0%Standard Nearly Met:
20.0%Standard Met:
15.0%Standard Exceeded:
9.0%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2390.3, Students tested: 95, Standard Not Met: 44.0%, Nearly Met: 24.0%, Met: 16.0%, Exceeded: 16.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2397.9, Students tested: 137, Standard Not Met: 60.0%, Nearly Met: 21.0%, Met: 11.0%, Exceeded: 8.0%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2425.7, Students tested: 118, Standard Not Met: 62.0%, Nearly Met: 14.0%, Met: 19.0%, Exceeded: 5.0%)Alexandria Avenue Elementary School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All18%
- Males12%
- Females23%
- Hispanic16%
Math students tested: 361
Math students with scores: 359
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 18% |
State: | 37% |
Standard Not Met:
56.0%Standard Nearly Met:
26.0%Standard Met:
12.0%Standard Exceeded:
5.0%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2400.6, Students tested: 99, Standard Not Met: 44.0%, Nearly Met: 24.0%, Met: 16.0%, Exceeded: 15.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2416.4, Students tested: 140, Standard Not Met: 50.0%, Nearly Met: 34.0%, Met: 14.0%, Exceeded: 3.0%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2415.5, Students tested: 122, Standard Not Met: 73.0%, Nearly Met: 20.0%, Met: 7.0%, Exceeded: 0.0%)Alexandria Avenue Elementary School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All19%
- Males9%
- Females30%
- Asian45%
- Hispanic17%
ELA students tested: 332
ELA students with scores: 294
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 19% |
California: | 44% |
Standard Not Met:
55.0%Standard Nearly Met:
26.0%Standard Met:
13.0%Standard Exceeded:
6.0%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2368.1, Students tested: 132, Standard Not Met: 54.0%, Nearly Met: 29.0%, Met: 8.0%, Exceeded: 9.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2396.6, Students tested: 112, Standard Not Met: 62.0%, Nearly Met: 23.0%, Met: 12.0%, Exceeded: 4.0%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2457.2, Students tested: 88, Standard Not Met: 46.0%, Nearly Met: 25.0%, Met: 23.0%, Exceeded: 6.0%)Alexandria Avenue Elementary School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All17%
- Males13%
- Females21%
- Asian45%
- Hispanic16%
Math students tested: 336
Math students with scores: 331
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 17% |
California: | 34% |
Standard Not Met:
53.0%Standard Nearly Met:
30.0%Standard Met:
12.0%Standard Exceeded:
5.0%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2385.8, Students tested: 135, Standard Not Met: 53.0%, Nearly Met: 26.0%, Met: 14.0%, Exceeded: 6.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2427.0, Students tested: 113, Standard Not Met: 45.0%, Nearly Met: 35.0%, Met: 11.0%, Exceeded: 8.0%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2422.7, Students tested: 88, Standard Not Met: 64.0%, Nearly Met: 27.0%, Met: 9.0%, Exceeded: 0.0%)Alexandria Avenue Elementary School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Paper-based CAASPP:
(State average from 9,784 schools)
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System includes paper-based tests:
California Standards Tests (CSTs) - The CSTs for science in grades five, eight, and ten are administered only to students in California public schools. All questions are multiple-choice. These tests were developed specifically to assess students' knowledge of the California content standards in science.
CST Science students tested: 113
CST Science students with scores: 113
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 17% |
State: | 54% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
19.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
19.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
45.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
14.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
3.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 311.5, Students tested: 113, Far Below Basic: 19.0%, Below Basic: 19.0%, Basic: 45.0%, Proficient: 14.0%, Advanced: 3.0%) CST Science students tested: 84
CST Science students with scores: 84
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 32% |
State: | 56% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
25.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
8.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
35.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
27.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
5.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 321.6, Students tested: 84, Far Below Basic: 25.0%, Below Basic: 8.0%, Basic: 35.0%, Proficient: 27.0%, Advanced: 5.0%) CST Science students tested: 94
CST Science students with scores: 94
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 35% |
State: | 60% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
23.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
18.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
24.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
21.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
14.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 328.0, Students tested: 94, Far Below Basic: 23.0%, Below Basic: 18.0%, Basic: 24.0%, Proficient: 21.0%, Advanced: 14.0%)23.0%
18.0%
24.0%
21.0%
14.0%
The Physical Fitness Test:
The Physical Fitness Test (PFT) for students in California schools is the FITNESSGRAM. The main goal of the test is to help students in starting life-long habits of regular physical activity.
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 136, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 70.6%, Needs Improvement: 24.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 5.1%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 136, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 47.1%, Needs Improvement: 27.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 25.7%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 136, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 85.3%, Needs Improvement: 14.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 136, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 97.1%, Needs Improvement: 2.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 136, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 50.7%, Needs Improvement: 49.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 136, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 73.5%, Needs Improvement: 26.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 120, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 44.2%, Needs Improvement: 46.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 9.1%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 120, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 45.0%, Needs Improvement: 21.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 33.3%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 120, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 89.2%, Needs Improvement: 10.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 120, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 98.3%, Needs Improvement: 1.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 120, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 25.8%, Needs Improvement: 74.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 120, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 72.5%, Needs Improvement: 27.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 90, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 51.1%, Needs Improvement: 35.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 13.3%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 90, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 44.4%, Needs Improvement: 22.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 33.4%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 90, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 93.3%, Needs Improvement: 6.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 90, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 93.3%, Needs Improvement: 6.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 90, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 53.3%, Needs Improvement: 46.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 90, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 71.1%, Needs Improvement: 28.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 92, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 42.4%, Needs Improvement: 52.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 5.4%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 92, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 40.2%, Needs Improvement: 25.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 34.8%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 92, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 90.2%, Needs Improvement: 9.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 92, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 95.7%, Needs Improvement: 4.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 92, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 58.7%, Needs Improvement: 41.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 92, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 70.7%, Needs Improvement: 29.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 114, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 64.9%, Needs Improvement: 29.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 5.3%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 114, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 46.5%, Needs Improvement: 14.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 38.6%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 114, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 86.8%, Needs Improvement: 13.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 114, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 75.4%, Needs Improvement: 24.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 114, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 58.8%, Needs Improvement: 41.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 114, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 57.9%, Needs Improvement: 42.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 135, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 43.7%, Needs Improvement: 44.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 11.9%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 135, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 42.2%, Needs Improvement: 8.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 48.9%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 135, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 80.0%, Needs Improvement: 20.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 135, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 97.8%, Needs Improvement: 2.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 135, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 48.9%, Needs Improvement: 51.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 135, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 63.0%, Needs Improvement: 37.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
California English Language Development Test:
(State average from 9,932 schools)
Students in kindergarten through grade twelve whose home language is not English are required by law to take an English skills test. In California, the test is called the California English Language Development Test (CELDT).
Alexandria Avenue Elementary School - students who met CELDT criterion (all grades)
All Grades:Student Count: 428
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 111
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 26.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 127
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 5
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 4.0% |
State: | 13.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 330.5 |
California: | 364.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 265.1 |
California: | 276.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 329.7 |
State: | 375.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 265.2 |
State: | 286.0 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 74
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 54
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 73.0% |
State: | 44.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 465.2 |
California: | 439.9 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 431.8 |
State: | 383.8 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 488.1 |
State: | 446.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 420.3 |
State: | 386.5 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 68
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 18
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 26.0% |
State: | 27.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 488.6 |
California: | 477.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 434.1 |
California: | 440.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 497.1 |
State: | 483.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 466.2 |
State: | 456.4 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 50
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 5
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 10.0% |
State: | 26.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 457.5 |
California: | 475.9 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 434.5 |
State: | 459.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 499.6 |
California: | 491.7 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 458.5 |
State: | 478.6 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 59
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 13
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 22.0% |
State: | 37.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 457.6 |
California: | 509.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 457.5 |
State: | 490.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 489.5 |
California: | 515.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 468.7 |
California: | 502.2 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 50
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 16
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 32.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 513.7 |
California: | 533.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 485.4 |
California: | 514.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 540.7 |
State: | 530.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 502.8 |
State: | 519.1 |
All Grades:Student Count: 436
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 144
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 33.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 101
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 20
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 20.0% |
California: | 13.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 381.5 |
California: | 365.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 282.6 |
California: | 279.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 385.1 |
California: | 374.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 286.7 |
California: | 285.8 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 81
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 56
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 69.0% |
California: | 42.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 462.1 |
California: | 437.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 432.9 |
California: | 382.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 482.6 |
State: | 443.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 414.1 |
California: | 383.8 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 76
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 16
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 21.0% |
California: | 27.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 479.3 |
State: | 478.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 434.0 |
State: | 441.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 495.4 |
California: | 482.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 454.4 |
State: | 458.7 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 57
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 12
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 21.0% |
California: | 26.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 453.8 |
State: | 475.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 442.9 |
California: | 461.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 506.7 |
State: | 493.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 470.1 |
California: | 479.8 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 69
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 23
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 33.0% |
State: | 37.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 487.5 |
California: | 511.0 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 477.2 |
State: | 494.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 526.6 |
State: | 515.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 492.5 |
California: | 504.8 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 52
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 17
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 33.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 491.6 |
California: | 533.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 487.2 |
State: | 515.8 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 508.7 |
State: | 527.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 491.8 |
State: | 519.3 |
All Grades:Student Count: 421
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 127
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 30.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 116
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 20
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 17.0% |
State: | 12.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 392.3 |
State: | 362.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 296.7 |
California: | 277.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 380.7 |
State: | 373.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 305.3 |
California: | 289.5 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 89
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 53
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 60.0% |
California: | 40.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 451.4 |
State: | 434.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 407.0 |
State: | 380.8 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 468.3 |
California: | 443.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 393.9 |
California: | 386.6 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 61
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 15
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 25.0% |
California: | 27.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 481.5 |
State: | 477.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 434.0 |
State: | 442.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 498.7 |
State: | 483.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 473.1 |
State: | 459.9 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 75
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 14
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 19.0% |
State: | 28.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 456.5 |
State: | 478.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 460.6 |
California: | 464.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 502.2 |
State: | 494.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 491.8 |
State: | 486.2 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 47
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 14
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 30.0% |
California: | 36.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 489.8 |
California: | 509.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 465.9 |
California: | 494.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 528.3 |
California: | 515.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 486.8 |
California: | 505.6 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 33
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 11
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 33.0% |
State: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 519.7 |
California: | 535.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 497.2 |
California: | 519.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 561.0 |
State: | 532.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 513.6 |
State: | 523.7 |
All Grades:Student Count: 459
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 166
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 36.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 115
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 22
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 19.0% |
California: | 11.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 387.7 |
State: | 358.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 295.5 |
California: | 275.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 388.8 |
California: | 365.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 310.2 |
State: | 285.3 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 80
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 46
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 58.0% |
California: | 37.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 449.4 |
California: | 432.0 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 408.0 |
California: | 380.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 473.0 |
California: | 438.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 394.5 |
State: | 383.8 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 118
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 46
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 39.0% |
State: | 27.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 496.7 |
State: | 476.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 462.7 |
California: | 444.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 524.5 |
State: | 481.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 489.0 |
California: | 461.7 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 60
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 17
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 28.0% |
State: | 29.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 473.2 |
California: | 478.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 467.2 |
State: | 470.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 517.9 |
California: | 494.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 489.8 |
California: | 487.2 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 46
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 13
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 28.0% |
California: | 38.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 503.4 |
California: | 512.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 487.5 |
California: | 499.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 534.7 |
State: | 514.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 505.8 |
California: | 509.1 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 40
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 22
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 55.0% |
State: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 527.3 |
California: | 534.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 512.7 |
California: | 521.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 534.0 |
State: | 531.7 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 524.3 |
California: | 525.0 |
All Grades:Student Count: 477
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 154
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 32.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 94
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 10
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 11.0% |
State: | 9.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 383.8 |
State: | 359.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 323.2 |
State: | 301.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 365.7 |
California: | 351.7 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 370.5 |
State: | 347.9 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 130
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 75
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 58.0% |
State: | 35.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 456.7 |
State: | 428.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 412.6 |
State: | 393.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 465.8 |
State: | 429.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 416.0 |
California: | 405.0 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 90
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 30
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 33.0% |
California: | 28.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 495.6 |
California: | 483.4 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 442.8 |
California: | 444.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 501.2 |
California: | 477.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 484.7 |
California: | 468.9 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 65
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 10
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 15.0% |
State: | 30.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 464.3 |
California: | 482.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 458.6 |
California: | 482.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 470.6 |
California: | 483.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 484.3 |
California: | 496.8 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 48
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 9
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 19.0% |
State: | 35.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 495.8 |
State: | 511.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 490.3 |
State: | 506.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 471.4 |
California: | 501.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 501.9 |
State: | 514.3 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 50
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 20
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 40.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 549.5 |
California: | 537.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 512.7 |
California: | 528.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 518.0 |
California: | 517.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 521.7 |
California: | 531.8 |
All Grades:Student Count: 517
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 108
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 21.0% |
California: | 35.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 149
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 8
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 5.0% |
California: | 9.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 357.3 |
California: | 358.9 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 304.8 |
State: | 299.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 342.0 |
California: | 357.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 366.1 |
State: | 350.9 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 101
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 34
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 34.0% |
State: | 35.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 441.4 |
State: | 428.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 401.1 |
State: | 391.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 434.0 |
California: | 434.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 406.2 |
State: | 405.5 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 76
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 13
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 17.0% |
California: | 25.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 484.1 |
State: | 478.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 415.9 |
California: | 442.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 469.5 |
State: | 478.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 453.2 |
State: | 465.8 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 59
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 12
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 20.0% |
State: | 32.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 474.4 |
State: | 493.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 486.9 |
State: | 482.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 467.4 |
State: | 486.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 484.4 |
State: | 494.3 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 65
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 14
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 22.0% |
State: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 497.7 |
California: | 522.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 489.2 |
State: | 510.8 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 490.5 |
State: | 505.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 504.2 |
State: | 512.8 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 67
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 27
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 40.0% |
California: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 532.0 |
California: | 544.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 517.0 |
California: | 531.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 514.1 |
California: | 519.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 521.0 |
State: | 527.0 |
All Grades:Student Count: 487
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 107
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 22.0% |
State: | 31.0% |
Kindergarten:Student Count: 112
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 3
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 3.0% |
California: | 8.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 338.8 |
California: | 348.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 295.0 |
State: | 294.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 351.2 |
California: | 345.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 341.1 |
California: | 337.4 |
Grade 1:Student Count: 96
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 33
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 34.0% |
State: | 32.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 432.4 |
California: | 423.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 379.9 |
California: | 389.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 449.5 |
California: | 431.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 404.5 |
California: | 402.3 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 68
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 8
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 12.0% |
California: | 24.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 471.2 |
California: | 466.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 422.0 |
State: | 440.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 497.1 |
California: | 484.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 440.0 |
California: | 452.2 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 87
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 15
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 17.0% |
State: | 25.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 460.5 |
California: | 468.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 455.3 |
State: | 471.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 488.1 |
State: | 486.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 476.2 |
State: | 484.8 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 73
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 22
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 30.0% |
State: | 33.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 503.6 |
State: | 504.0 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 490.7 |
California: | 503.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 503.8 |
State: | 505.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 491.4 |
State: | 506.6 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 51
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 26
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 51.0% |
California: | 44.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 523.7 |
State: | 528.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 515.8 |
State: | 526.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 516.1 |
State: | 517.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 511.2 |
State: | 524.0 |
Accountability
Adequate Yearly Progress:
(State average from 9,846 schools)
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) - Accountability system mandated by federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Statistics are based on test results of the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program, the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE), and the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA).
Alexandria Avenue Elementary School - Adequate Yearly Progress status
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP98
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 320 out of 320 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 12 out of 12 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 329 out of 329 enrolled)
- English Learners: 98% (tested 262 out of 266 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 35 out of 35 enrolled)
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED99
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 322 out of 324 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 12 out of 12 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 330 out of 332 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 270 out of 271 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 35 out of 35 enrolled)
Met all AYP Criteria: Yes
Number of AYP criteria met: 9
Number of AYP criteria possible: 9
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)Attendance rate (calculated by using number of days attended and enrolled) : 96
Met Attendance rate Target: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
ELA Participation RateAlexandria Avenue Elementary School: | 88.0% |
California: | 95.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic87
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black80
- White50
- SED88
- LEP84
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 87% (tested 269 out of 308 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 12 out of 12 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 80% (tested 4 out of 5 enrolled)
- White: 50% (tested 1 out of 2 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 88% (tested 282 out of 322 enrolled)
- English Learners: 84% (tested 204 out of 243 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 40 out of 40 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 19.6% |
California: | 42.6% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic18
- Asian46
- SED19
- LEP12
- With Disabilities3
- Hispanic: 18% (46 out of 261 valid scores)
- Asian: 46% (5 out of 11 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 19% (53 out of 279 valid scores)
- English Learners: 12% (24 out of 197 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 3% (1 out of 39 valid scores)
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Math Participation RateHere: | 99.0% |
California: | 94.9% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED99
- LEP99
- With Disabilities98
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 305 out of 309 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 12 out of 12 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 319 out of 323 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 242 out of 245 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 98% (tested 39 out of 40 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic17
- Asian46
- SED17
- LEP14
- With Disabilities3
- Hispanic: 17% (50 out of 294 valid scores)
- Asian: 46% (5 out of 11 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 17% (54 out of 313 valid scores)
- English Learners: 14% (32 out of 232 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 3% (1 out of 38 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 13
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 89.2%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 386 out of 386 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 27 out of 27 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 13 out of 13 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 441 out of 441 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 305 out of 305 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 61 out of 61 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 37.8% |
California: | 55.7% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic36
- Asian57
- Filipino62
- SED38
- LEP34
- With Disabilities18
- Hispanic: 36% (129 out of 358 valid scores)
- Asian: 57% (12 out of 21 valid scores)
- Filipino: 62% (8 out of 13 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 38% (153 out of 404 valid scores)
- English Learners: 34% (98 out of 287 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 18% (10 out of 56 valid scores)
Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 89.5%
Math Participation RateAlexandria Avenue Elementary School: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.2% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black78
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 386 out of 386 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 27 out of 27 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 13 out of 13 enrolled)
- Black: 78% (tested 7 out of 9 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 439 out of 441 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 305 out of 305 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 60 out of 61 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 54.3% |
California: | 59.6% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic53
- Asian76
- Filipino77
- SED55
- LEP50
- With Disabilities23
- Hispanic: 53% (188 out of 358 valid scores)
- Asian: 76% (16 out of 21 valid scores)
- Filipino: 77% (10 out of 13 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 55% (220 out of 404 valid scores)
- English Learners: 50% (144 out of 287 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 23% (13 out of 56 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 8
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 78.4%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 412 out of 412 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 19 out of 19 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 18 out of 18 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 440 out of 440 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 322 out of 322 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 66 out of 66 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 39.8% |
California: | 57.4% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic38
- Asian79
- Filipino72
- SED39
- LEP32
- With Disabilities16
- Hispanic: 38% (147 out of 392 valid scores)
- Asian: 79% (11 out of 14 valid scores)
- Filipino: 72% (13 out of 18 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 39% (161 out of 413 valid scores)
- English Learners: 32% (99 out of 309 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 16% (10 out of 62 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 79%
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 412 out of 412 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 19 out of 19 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 18 out of 18 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 440 out of 440 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 322 out of 322 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 66 out of 66 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveAlexandria Avenue Elementary School: | 43.4% |
California: | 59.9% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic40
- Asian86
- Filipino83
- SED42
- LEP35
- With Disabilities23
- Hispanic: 40% (157 out of 392 valid scores)
- Asian: 86% (12 out of 14 valid scores)
- Filipino: 83% (15 out of 18 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 42% (175 out of 413 valid scores)
- English Learners: 35% (108 out of 309 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 23% (14 out of 62 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 13
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 67.6%
ELA Participation RateAlexandria Avenue Elementary School: | 99.0% |
California: | 98.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White78
- SED99
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 459 out of 459 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 20 out of 20 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 22 out of 22 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 8 out of 8 enrolled)
- White: 78% (tested 7 out of 9 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 475 out of 478 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 332 out of 332 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 71 out of 71 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic37
- Asian53
- Filipino64
- SED38
- LEP32
- With Disabilities21
- Hispanic: 37% (155 out of 425 valid scores)
- Asian: 53% (8 out of 15 valid scores)
- Filipino: 64% (14 out of 22 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 38% (168 out of 442 valid scores)
- English Learners: 32% (103 out of 321 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 21% (14 out of 68 valid scores)
Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 68.5%
Math Participation RateAlexandria Avenue Elementary School: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.0% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White78
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 459 out of 459 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 20 out of 20 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 22 out of 22 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 8 out of 8 enrolled)
- White: 78% (tested 7 out of 9 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 476 out of 478 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 332 out of 332 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 71 out of 71 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic48
- Asian60
- Filipino91
- SED50
- LEP45
- With Disabilities27
- Hispanic: 48% (205 out of 425 valid scores)
- Asian: 60% (9 out of 15 valid scores)
- Filipino: 91% (20 out of 22 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 50% (222 out of 442 valid scores)
- English Learners: 45% (144 out of 321 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 27% (18 out of 68 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 9
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 56.8%
ELA Participation RateAlexandria Avenue Elementary School: | 100.0% |
State: | 98.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 501 out of 501 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 15 out of 15 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 27 out of 27 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 12 out of 12 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 533 out of 533 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 403 out of 403 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 82 out of 82 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic33
- Asian67
- Filipino81
- Black18
- SED36
- LEP30
- With Disabilities18
- Hispanic: 33% (157 out of 475 valid scores)
- Asian: 67% (10 out of 15 valid scores)
- Filipino: 81% (21 out of 26 valid scores)
- Black: 18% (2 out of 11 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 36% (180 out of 505 valid scores)
- English Learners: 30% (115 out of 385 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 18% (14 out of 78 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 58%
Math Participation RateAlexandria Avenue Elementary School: | 100.0% |
State: | 98.1% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 501 out of 501 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 15 out of 15 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 27 out of 27 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 12 out of 12 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 533 out of 533 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 403 out of 403 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 82 out of 82 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveAlexandria Avenue Elementary School: | 41.0% |
State: | 57.1% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic38
- Asian80
- Filipino92
- Black18
- SED40
- LEP38
- With Disabilities23
- Hispanic: 38% (178 out of 475 valid scores)
- Asian: 80% (12 out of 15 valid scores)
- Filipino: 92% (24 out of 26 valid scores)
- Black: 18% (2 out of 11 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 40% (203 out of 505 valid scores)
- English Learners: 38% (145 out of 385 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 23% (18 out of 78 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: Yes
Number of AYP criteria met: 17
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 46%
ELA Participation RateAlexandria Avenue Elementary School: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 532 out of 533 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 24 out of 24 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 26 out of 26 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 8 out of 8 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 572 out of 573 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 443 out of 443 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 99 out of 99 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 34.6% |
California: | 52.4% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic32
- Asian58
- Filipino60
- SED34
- LEP31
- With Disabilities13
- Hispanic: 32% (160 out of 502 valid scores)
- Asian: 58% (14 out of 24 valid scores)
- Filipino: 60% (15 out of 25 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 34% (182 out of 540 valid scores)
- English Learners: 31% (132 out of 432 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 13% (12 out of 92 valid scores)
Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 47.5%
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 532 out of 533 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 24 out of 24 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 26 out of 26 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 8 out of 8 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 572 out of 573 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 443 out of 443 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 99 out of 99 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveAlexandria Avenue Elementary School: | 61.5% |
State: | 55.6% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic58
- Asian88
- Filipino96
- SED61
- LEP57
- With Disabilities27
- Hispanic: 58% (293 out of 502 valid scores)
- Asian: 88% (21 out of 24 valid scores)
- Filipino: 96% (24 out of 25 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 61% (328 out of 540 valid scores)
- English Learners: 57% (248 out of 432 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 27% (25 out of 92 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 13
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 35.2%
ELA Participation RateHere: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.1% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 582 out of 585 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 29 out of 29 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 29 out of 29 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 8 out of 8 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 612 out of 615 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 500 out of 502 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 92 out of 92 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic25
- Asian63
- Filipino54
- SED28
- LEP23
- With Disabilities3
- Hispanic: 25% (135 out of 546 valid scores)
- Asian: 63% (17 out of 27 valid scores)
- Filipino: 54% (15 out of 28 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 28% (162 out of 580 valid scores)
- English Learners: 23% (110 out of 482 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 3% (3 out of 87 valid scores)
Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 37%
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 582 out of 585 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 29 out of 29 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 29 out of 29 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 8 out of 8 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 612 out of 615 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 500 out of 502 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 92 out of 92 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 45.8% |
California: | 52.3% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic42
- Asian74
- Filipino79
- SED45
- LEP41
- With Disabilities21
- Hispanic: 42% (231 out of 546 valid scores)
- Asian: 74% (20 out of 27 valid scores)
- Filipino: 79% (22 out of 28 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 45% (263 out of 580 valid scores)
- English Learners: 41% (196 out of 482 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 21% (18 out of 87 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 15
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation RateAlexandria Avenue Elementary School: | 98.0% |
State: | 97.8% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- Asian100
- Filipino98
- Black88
- White100
- SED99
- LEP99
- With Disabilities92
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 649 out of 658 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 26 out of 26 enrolled)
- Filipino: 98% (tested 33 out of 34 enrolled)
- Black: 88% (tested 7 out of 8 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 691 out of 701 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 565 out of 571 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 92% (tested 82 out of 90 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 26.5% |
California: | 46.4% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic23
- Asian77
- Filipino56
- SED26
- LEP21
- With Disabilities10
- Hispanic: 23% (139 out of 603 valid scores)
- Asian: 77% (17 out of 22 valid scores)
- Filipino: 56% (15 out of 27 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 26% (164 out of 638 valid scores)
- English Learners: 21% (111 out of 541 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 10% (7 out of 73 valid scores)
Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino98
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 655 out of 658 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 26 out of 26 enrolled)
- Filipino: 98% (tested 33 out of 34 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 8 out of 8 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 698 out of 701 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 570 out of 571 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 89 out of 90 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic38
- Asian86
- Filipino78
- SED41
- LEP37
- With Disabilities23
- Hispanic: 38% (233 out of 608 valid scores)
- Asian: 86% (19 out of 22 valid scores)
- Filipino: 78% (21 out of 27 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 41% (262 out of 643 valid scores)
- English Learners: 37% (202 out of 545 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 23% (18 out of 78 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 13
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation RateHere: | 99.0% |
California: | 97.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED99
- LEP99
- With Disabilities96
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 779 out of 786 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 40 out of 40 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 44 out of 44 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 807 out of 813 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 672 out of 676 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 96% (tested 80 out of 84 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic17
- Asian74
- Filipino53
- SED20
- LEP15
- With Disabilities9
- Hispanic: 17% (123 out of 723 valid scores)
- Asian: 74% (25 out of 34 valid scores)
- Filipino: 53% (21 out of 40 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 20% (150 out of 752 valid scores)
- English Learners: 15% (95 out of 638 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 9% (7 out of 75 valid scores)
Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation RateAlexandria Avenue Elementary School: | 100.0% |
State: | 97.5% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 783 out of 787 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 40 out of 40 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 44 out of 44 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 811 out of 814 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 677 out of 677 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 83 out of 84 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Asian68
- Filipino83
- SED40
- LEP36
- With Disabilities13
- Asian: 68% (23 out of 34 valid scores)
- Filipino: 83% (33 out of 40 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 40% (305 out of 756 valid scores)
- English Learners: 36% (230 out of 643 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 13% (10 out of 78 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 13
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation RateAlexandria Avenue Elementary School: | 100.0% |
State: | 99.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,071 out of 1,073 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 35 out of 35 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 53 out of 53 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,180 out of 1,182 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 935 out of 937 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 93 out of 94 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 20.2% |
California: | 44.5% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic18
- Asian57
- Filipino47
- SED20
- LEP15
- With Disabilities9
- Hispanic: 18% (180 out of 1,006 valid scores)
- Asian: 57% (16 out of 28 valid scores)
- Filipino: 47% (21 out of 45 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 20% (221 out of 1,095 valid scores)
- English Learners: 15% (137 out of 895 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 9% (8 out of 89 valid scores)
Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation RateSchool: | 100.0% |
California: | 99.2% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,070 out of 1,073 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 35 out of 35 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 53 out of 53 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,179 out of 1,182 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 935 out of 937 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 93 out of 94 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic36
- Asian71
- Filipino69
- SED39
- LEP37
- With Disabilities20
- Hispanic: 36% (365 out of 1,006 valid scores)
- Asian: 71% (20 out of 28 valid scores)
- Filipino: 69% (31 out of 45 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 39% (424 out of 1,095 valid scores)
- English Learners: 37% (328 out of 895 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 20% (18 out of 89 valid scores)
Health & Safety
Harassment & Bullying:
(State average from 2,337 schools)
An allegation is a claim or assertion that someone has done something wrong or illegal, typically made without proof.
Harassment or bullying on the basis of sex includes sexual harassment or bullying and gender-based harassment or bullying. Sexual harassment or bullying is unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature, such as unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal, nonverbal, or physical conduct of a sexual nature. Gender-based harassment or bullying is nonsexual intimidation or abusive behavior toward a student based on the student's actual or perceived sex, including harassment based on gender identity, gender expression, and nonconformity with gender stereotypes. Harassing conduct may take many forms, including verbal acts and name-calling, as well as non-verbal behavior, such as graphic and written statements, or conduct that is physically threatening, harmful or humiliating. The conduct can be carried out by school employees, other students, and non-employee third parties. Both male and female students can be victims of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex, and the harasser or bully and the victim can be of the same sex. Bullying on the basis of sex constitutes sexual harassment.
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex: 1
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex per 1,000 students
Students reported as harassed or bullied on the basis of sex: 2 (all female)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
(State average from 8,737 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.
Chronic Student Absenteeism
- Hispanic64
- Asian2
- Black2
- White7
- LEP34
- IDEA7
- 5042
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 75 (male: 39, female: 36)
- Hispanic: 64 (male: 35, female: 29)
- Asian: 2 (all male)
- Black: 2 (all female)
- White: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 34 (male: 14, female: 20)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
- Section 504: 2 (all male)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 studentsAlexandria Avenue Elementary School: | 99.6 |
California: | 172.7 |
Chronic Student Absenteeism
- Hispanic82
- Asian10
- Native Hawaiian2
- Black4
- White4
- LEP49
- IDEA10
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 102 (male: 52, female: 50)
- Hispanic: 82 (male: 41, female: 41)
- Asian: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 2 (all male)
- Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 49 (male: 20, female: 29)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Comments
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: