Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Bonham Elementary School in Midland, TX
(PK-06 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 43
Address
 909 BONHAM ST
Midland, TX 79703
Telephone
(432) 240-6000
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.midlandisd.net
City-data.com school rating
43
Students
697
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
44.7
Free lunch eligible students
303
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
76
School district
MIDLAND ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
Bonham Elementary School:

43
LEE H S (1.1 miles):

42
RUSK EL (1.1 miles):

28
LONG EL (0.9 miles):

27
TEXAS LEADERSHIP OF MIDLAND (0.9 miles):

27
ALAMO J H (0.2 miles):

20
LAMAR EL (1.0 miles):

18
PREMIER H S OF MIDLAND (0.5 miles):

16
BURNET EL (1.3 miles):

10
Bonham Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Midland County:

36
Midland:

36
Bonham Elementary School:

43

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 697
Enrollment in 2015: 852
Enrollment in 2014: 812
Enrollment in 2013: 751
Enrollment in 2012: 771
Enrollment in 2011: 615
Enrollment in 2010: 570
Enrollment in 2009: 563
Enrollment in 2008: 556
Enrollment in 2007: 611
Enrollment in 2006: 560
Enrollment in 2005: 591
Enrollment in 2004: 589
Enrollment in 2003: 602
Enrollment in 2002: 564
Enrollment in 2001: 570
Enrollment in 2000: 518
Enrollment in 1999: 594

Bonham Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05G06Total
All students451071059994859468697
Female students2252513950415132338
Male students2355546044444336359
American Indian/Alaska Native students12 - - - - - 14
Asian students3843413329
Hispanic students3469686164536538452
Black students42129599858
White students324212218211717143
Two or More Races students - 2 - 431 - 111

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 45
Kindergarten enrollment: 107
1st grade enrollment: 105
2nd grade enrollment: 99
3rd grade enrollment: 94
4th grade enrollment: 85
5th grade enrollment: 94
6th grade enrollment: 68

Bonham Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 338 (48.5%)
School:

48.5%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 359 (51.5%)
Bonham Elementary School:

51.5%
State:

50.1%

Bonham Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 4 (0.6%)
Bonham Elementary School:

0.6%
Texas:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 29 (4.2%)
Bonham Elementary School:

4.2%
State:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 452 (64.8%)
Bonham Elementary School:

64.8%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 58 (8.3%)
Bonham Elementary School:

8.3%
State:

11.6%
White enrollment: 143 (20.5%)
Here:

20.5%
State:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 11 (1.6%)
School:

1.6%
Texas:

2.1%

Bonham Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 379 (54.4%)
Here:

54.4%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 303 (43.5%)
Here:

43.5%
Texas:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 76 (10.9%)
Here:

10.9%
Texas:

6.2%

Bonham Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 44.7

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 5
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 5
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 9.6
Number of FTE nurses: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
Here:

15.6
Texas:

15.6

Bonham Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $2,286,694
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 44.6 (Salary Expenditures: $2,021,458)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $111,888)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $153,348)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $69,878
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $2,537,761
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $2,229,375
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $43,150)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $111,888)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $153,348)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $196,878

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic202
  • Asian16
  • Black4
  • White2
  • IDEA19
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 224 (male: 119, female: 105)
  • Hispanic: 202 (male: 104, female: 98)
  • Asian: 16 (male: 11, female: 5)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 19 (male: 17, female: 2)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.

    Students with disabilities served under IDEA

  • Hispanic35
  • Black4
  • White4
  • LEP20
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 43 (male: 33, female: 10)
  • Hispanic: 35 (male: 25, female: 10)
  • Black: 4 (all male)
  • White: 4 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 20 (male: 16, female: 4)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 11 (male: 7, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,162 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
Bonham Elementary School:

3.7%
Texas:

5.2%
Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)

Percent of 1st grade students retained
Bonham Elementary School:

3.8%
State:

6.1%
Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 2 (all female)
  • White: 2

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
Bonham Elementary School:

2.0%
Texas:

4.8%
Total number of students retained in 4th grade: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Percent of 4th grade students retained
Bonham Elementary School:

2.4%
State:

3.6%
Total number of students retained in 5th grade: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Percent of 5th grade students retained
Bonham Elementary School:

2.1%
State:

4.3%

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,436
  • Males1,436
  • Females1,436
  • Hispanic1,427
  • Asian1,456
  • White1,432
Math Average Scale Score:

1,436
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 65
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 65

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.5 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.2 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.6 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.5 (63%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 43%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 12%

25%
43%
20%
12%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,436, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 9%)
26%
39%
26%
9%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,436, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 48%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 16%)
23%
48%
13%
16%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,427, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 9%)
24%
46%
21%
9%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,456, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 20%)
20%
60%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,432, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 10%)
33%
34%
23%
10%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,442
  • Males1,421
  • Females1,466
  • Hispanic1,446
  • Asian1,452
  • White1,415
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,442
Texas:

1,423
Reading students tested: 65
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 66

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9 (64%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 35%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 17%

22%
35%
26%
17%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,421, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 9%)
29%
28%
34%
9%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,466, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 27%)
13%
44%
16%
27%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,446, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 18%)
18%
37%
27%
18%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,452, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 20%)
20%
60%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,415, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 10%)
29%
28%
33%
10%
3rd Grade (Spanish)

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,479
  • Males1,470
  • Females1,494
  • Hispanic1,479
Math Average Scale Score:

1,479
Texas:

510
Math students tested: 20
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 20

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.7 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.8 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.1 (76%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 40%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 35%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 15%

10%
40%
35%
15%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,470, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 8%)
17%
25%
50%
8%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,494, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 62%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 25%)
62%
13%
25%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,479, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 15%)
10%
40%
35%
15%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,390
  • Males1,355
  • Females1,437
  • Hispanic1,390
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,390
Texas:

956
Reading students tested: 19
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 19

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.4 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.1 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.1 (58%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 16%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 15%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 32%

37%
16%
15%
32%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,355, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 55%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 36%)
55%
9%
36%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,437, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 25%)
13%
25%
38%
25%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,390, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 32%)
37%
16%
15%
32%
4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,556
  • Males1,569
  • Females1,546
  • Hispanic1,535
  • Black1,477
  • White1,615
  • Multirace1,550
Math Average Scale Score:

1,556
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 80
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 80

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.9 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.2 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.2 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.3 (58%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 13%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 31%

28%
29%
13%
31%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,569, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 39%)
28%
25%
8%
39%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,546, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 25%)
27%
32%
16%
25%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,535, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 29%)
33%
31%
7%
29%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,477, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 10%)
40%
40%
10%
10%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,615, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 6%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 53%)
12%
6%
29%
53%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,550, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
20%
60%
20%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,480
  • Males1,467
  • Females1,489
  • Hispanic1,477
  • Black1,408
  • White1,520
  • Multirace1,472
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,480
Texas:

1,496
Reading students tested: 80
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 80

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.2 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.1 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.7 (59%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 24%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 11%

38%
24%
28%
11%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,467, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 14%)
42%
22%
22%
14%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,489, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 34%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 9%)
34%
25%
32%
9%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,477, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 13%)
40%
20%
27%
13%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,408, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
60%
20%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,520, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 12%)
18%
29%
41%
12%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,472, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
20%
60%
20%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,514
  • Males3,495
  • Females3,529
  • Hispanic3,486
  • Black3,395
  • White3,608
  • Multirace3,327
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,514
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 81
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 81

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.7 (46%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 3.5 (44%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.5 (60%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 51%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 24%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 1%

51%
24%
24%
1%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,495, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 3%)
50%
19%
28%
3%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,529, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 51%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
51%
29%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,486, Tested: 46, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 57%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 2%)
57%
17%
24%
2%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,395, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 0%)
60%
10%
30%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,608, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 0%)
35%
47%
18%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 3,327, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
60%
40%
4th Grade (Spanish)

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,503
  • Males1,454
  • Females1,544
  • Hispanic1,503
Math Average Scale Score:

1,503
State:

381
Math students tested: 13
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 13

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.4 (49%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.9 (54%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.2 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.8 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 39%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 15%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 8%

38%
39%
15%
8%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,454, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
50%
50%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,544, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 14%)
29%
28%
29%
14%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,503, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 8%)
38%
39%
15%
8%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,501
  • Males1,408
  • Females1,581
  • Hispanic1,501
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,501
State:

815
Reading students tested: 13
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 13

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.6 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.5 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.4 (57%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 39%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 23%

15%
39%
23%
23%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,408, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 0%)
33%
50%
17%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,581, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 43%)
29%
28%
43%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,501, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 23%)
15%
39%
23%
23%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade (Spanish))

  • All3,576
  • Males3,274
  • Females3,835
  • Hispanic3,576
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,576
State:

2,017
Writing students tested: 13
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 13

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.6 (45%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.5 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.2 (63%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 54%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 15%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 31%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

54%
15%
31%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,274, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 83%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 0%)
83%
17%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,835, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 0%)
29%
28%
43%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,576, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 54%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 0%)
54%
15%
31%
5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,663
  • Males1,669
  • Females1,656
  • Hispanic1,684
  • Black1,568
  • White1,663
Math Average Scale Score:

1,663
Texas:

1,603
Math students tested: 97
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 97

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.1 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.6 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.3 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.8 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 20%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 43%

18%
20%
19%
43%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,669, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 48%)
21%
14%
17%
48%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,656, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 39%)
14%
27%
20%
39%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,684, Tested: 62, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 50%)
15%
14%
21%
50%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,568, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 13%)
25%
50%
12%
13%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,663, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 43%)
17%
26%
14%
43%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,547
  • Males1,555
  • Females1,538
  • Hispanic1,566
  • Black1,492
  • White1,534
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,547
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 96
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 96

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.3 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.8 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.6 (62%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 21%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 19%

32%
21%
28%
19%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,555, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 23%)
35%
17%
25%
23%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,538, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 15%)
29%
25%
31%
15%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,566, Tested: 61, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 23%)
23%
28%
26%
23%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,492, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 0%)
38%
13%
50%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,534, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 17%)
43%
9%
31%
17%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All4,047
  • Males4,076
  • Females4,018
  • Hispanic4,101
  • Black3,601
  • White4,091
Science Average Scale Score:

4,047
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 95
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 95

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.5 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.1 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.5 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 9.1 (76%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 31%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 26%

17%
26%
31%
26%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,076, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 29%)
19%
25%
27%
29%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,018, Tested: 47, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 23%)
15%
28%
34%
23%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,101, Tested: 61, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 31%)
16%
22%
31%
31%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,601, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 57%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 0%)
29%
57%
14%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,091, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 26%)
17%
22%
35%
26%
5th Grade (Spanish)

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,658
  • Males1,625
  • Females1,673
  • Hispanic1,658
Math Average Scale Score:

1,658
Texas:

298
Math students tested: 16
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 16

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.3 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.2 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.6 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.8 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 12%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 44%

13%
32%
12%
44%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,625, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 20%)
60%
20%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,673, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 55%)
18%
18%
9%
55%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,658, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 44%)
13%
32%
12%
44%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,624
  • Males1,592
  • Females1,638
  • Hispanic1,624
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,624
Texas:

683
Reading students tested: 17
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 17

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.8 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.4 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.4 (67%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 6%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 47%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 29%

18%
6%
47%
29%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,592, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 20%)
40%
40%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,638, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 33%)
8%
9%
50%
33%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,624, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 6%, Meets: 47%, Masters: 29%)
18%
6%
47%
29%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade (Spanish))

  • All3,898
  • Males3,922
  • Females3,887
  • Hispanic3,898
Science Average Scale Score:

3,898
Texas:

857
Science students tested: 17
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 17

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.5 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.5 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.9 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.9 (74%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 59%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 17%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 18%

6%
59%
17%
18%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,922, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 20%)
60%
20%
20%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,887, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 59%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 17%)
8%
59%
16%
17%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,898, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 59%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 18%)
6%
59%
17%
18%
6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,637
  • Males1,637
  • Females1,636
  • Hispanic1,628
  • Black1,553
  • White1,673
Math Average Scale Score:

1,637
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 68
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 69

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.8 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.4 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.4 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.4 (48%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 37%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

22%
37%
25%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,637, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 11%)
17%
46%
26%
11%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,636, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 21%)
27%
28%
24%
21%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,628, Tested: 37, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 19%)
27%
38%
16%
19%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,553, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
40%
40%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,673, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 14%)
9%
36%
41%
14%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,593
  • Males1,582
  • Females1,605
  • Hispanic1,604
  • Black1,489
  • White1,612
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,593
State:

1,457
Reading students tested: 68
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 69

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.9 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.2 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.4 (62%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 35%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 15%

24%
35%
26%
15%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,582, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 49%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 6%)
20%
49%
25%
6%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,605, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 24%)
27%
21%
28%
24%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,604, Tested: 37, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 16%)
19%
32%
33%
16%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,489, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 80%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
80%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,612, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 14%)
14%
45%
27%
14%

Health & Safety


Referrals and Arrests:
Show data for

(State average from 1,516 schools)
Referral to law enforcement is an action by which a student is reported to any law enforcement agency or official, including a school police unit, for an incident that occurs on school grounds, during school-related events, or while taking school transportation, regardless of whether official action is taken. Citations, tickets, court referrals, and school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.

School-related arrest refers to an arrest of a student for any activity conducted on school grounds, during off-campus school activities (including while taking school transportation), or due to a referral by any school official. All school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.
Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2

Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official per 1,000 students
Here:

2.9
State:

17.4
Students without disabilities who received a school-related arrest: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2

Students without disabilities who received a school-related arrest per 1,000 students
Bonham Elementary School:

2.9
Texas:

13.1

Harassment & Bullying:
Show data for

(State average from 919 schools)
An allegation is a claim or assertion that someone has done something wrong or illegal, typically made without proof.

Harassment or bullying on the basis of race, color, or national origin refers to intimidation or abusive behavior toward a student based on actual or perceived race, color or national origin. Harassing conduct may take many forms, including verbal acts and name-calling, as well as non-verbal behavior, such as graphic and written statements, or conduct that is physically threatening, harmful or humiliating. The conduct can be carried out by school employees, other students, and non-employee third parties. Bullying on the basis of race, color, or national origin constitutes racial harassment.
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of race, color, or national origin: 1
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of race, color, or national origin per 1,000 students
School:

1.4
State:

1.9
Students reported as harassed or bullied on the basis of race, color, or national origin: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic37
  • Black7
  • White10
  • Multirace2
  • LEP16
  • IDEA10
  • 5047
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 56 (male: 35, female: 21)
  • Hispanic: 37 (male: 23, female: 14)
  • Black: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • White: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 16 (male: 8, female: 8)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • Section 504: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
School:

80.3
Texas:

147.9

Restraint and Seclusion:
Show data for

(State average from 2,148 schools)
Mechanical restraint refers to the use of any device or equipment to restrict a student's freedom of movement. The term does not include devices implemented by trained school personnel, or utilized by a student that have been prescribed by an appropriate medical or related services professional and are used for the specific and approved purposes for which such devices were designed, such as:
  • Adaptive devices or mechanical supports used to achieve proper body position, balance, or alignment to allow greater freedom of mobility than would be possible without the use of such devices or mechanical supports;
  • Vehicle safety restraints when used as intended during the transport of a student in a moving vehicle;
  • Restraints for medical immobilization; or Orthopedically prescribed devices that permit a student to participate in activities without risk of harm.


Physical restraint refers to a personal restriction that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a student to move his or her torso, arms, legs, or head freely. The term physical restraint does not include a physical escort. Physical escort means a temporary touching or holding of the hand, wrist, arm, shoulder or back for the purpose of inducing a student who is acting out to walk to a safe location.
Total Number of students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to mechanical restraint: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to mechanical restraint per 1,000 students
School:

2.9
Texas:

1.0
Total Number of students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint: 6 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Black: 2
  • White: 2

Students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint per 1,000 students
Here:

8.6
State:

6.8

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)
Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.

    School days missed due to out-of-school suspension

  • Hispanic2
  • Black2
  • LEP1
  • IDEA2
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 4 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Black: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 1
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 2

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
Bonham Elementary School:

2.9
State:

102.7

    Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Hispanic16
  • Black5
  • White16
  • Multirace2
  • LEP5
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 39 (male: 32, female: 7)
  • Hispanic: 16 (male: 14, female: 2)
  • Black: 5 (all male)
  • White: 16 (male: 11, female: 5)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 5 (all male)
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students with disabilities): 2

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students with disabilities)
School:

2.9
Texas:

27.5

    Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Hispanic5
  • American Indian2
  • Black2
  • White2
  • LEP2
  • 5042
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 11 (male: 9, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 5 (all male)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
  • Section 504: 2 (all male)
Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Midland, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Midland main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Bonham Elementary School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents