City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
89.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Data House School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
St. Lucie County: | 39 |
Fort Pierce: | 40 |
Data House School: | 89 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (772) 467-4020 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 56
School number: 5003
School type: Senior High
District Name: ST. LUCIE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 12
School's status regarding neglected and delinquent criteria: Neglected, Residential
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (772) 464-6169
Principal: Johnny Thornton
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 16
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 78
Senate District: 28
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 78% |
State average from 133 schools: | 66% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 83% |
State average from 133 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 93% |
State average from 133 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 53% |
State average from 133 schools: | 47% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 71% |
State average from 133 schools: | 61% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 83% |
State average from 132 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 71% |
State average from 133 schools: | 57% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathDATA HOUSE: | 83% |
State average from 133 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 615 |
State average from 133 schools: | 522 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 132 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2002: N
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 51% |
State average from 137 schools: | 57% |
Minority RateHere: | 43% |
State average from 137 schools: | 53% |
Region: 3
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 78% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 83% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 80% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 80% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 73% |
State average from 141 schools: | 64% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 84% |
State average from 133 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 100% |
State average from 139 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 55% |
State average from 133 schools: | 47% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 85% |
State average from 133 schools: | 65% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 81% |
State average from 136 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 85% |
State average from 133 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathDATA HOUSE: | 81% |
State average from 133 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 644 |
State average from 133 schools: | 540 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 134 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2002: N
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 46% |
State average from 132 schools: | 53% |
Minority RateHere: | 42% |
State average from 139 schools: | 52% |
Region: 3
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 74% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 82% |
State average from 124 schools: | 66% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 93% |
State average from 124 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 86% |
State average from 125 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 54% |
State average from 122 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains DATA HOUSE: | 63% |
State average from 122 schools: | 63% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 87% |
State average from 122 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 63% |
State average from 122 schools: | 61% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathDATA HOUSE: | 87% |
State average from 122 schools: | 70% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 615 |
State average from 122 schools: | 535 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 124 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 58% |
State average from 126 schools: | 49% |
Minority RateHere: | 57% |
State average from 125 schools: | 52% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 75% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1353 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 309 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 11% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 61% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 22% |
State average: | 32% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 83% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1697 |
State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 339 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 48% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 17% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 22% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 87% |
State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1712 |
State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500DATA HOUSE: | 321 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 32% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 11% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 42% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 63% |
State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1613 |
State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 294 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 28% |
State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 19% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 32% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 17% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 53% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2DATA HOUSE: | 3 |
State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1688 |
State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 294 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1DATA HOUSE: | 25% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 27% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 33% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 12% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 48% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 331 |
State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 11% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 37% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3DATA HOUSE: | 32% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 16% |
State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 53% |
State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12DATA HOUSE: | 8 |
State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1451 |
State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 333 |
State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 22% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 33% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 39% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 78% |
State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1731 |
State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 363 |
State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 43% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 30% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 22% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 96% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1829 |
State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 367 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 26% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 42% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 74% |
State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6DATA HOUSE: | 8 |
State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1668 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 309 |
State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1DATA HOUSE: | 29% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 22% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 26% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 18% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveDATA HOUSE: | 49% |
State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7DATA HOUSE: | 6 |
State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1770 |
State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 301 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 20% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 2DATA HOUSE: | 27% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 34% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 16% |
State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 53% |
State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1409 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 318 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1675 |
State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 336 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 06%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 06%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1711 |
State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 321 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1641 |
State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 299 |
State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1748 |
State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 306 |
State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 323 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1511 |
State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 346 |
State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1718 |
State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 360 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreDATA HOUSE: | 1698 |
State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 339 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1685 |
State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 313 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1819 |
State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 313 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 17
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 5 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 47%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 100%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1497 |
State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 332 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1583 |
State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 320 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1725 |
State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 324 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1620 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 295 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 339 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1604 |
State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 366 |
State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1604 |
State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 334 |
State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreDATA HOUSE: | 1805 |
State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 362 |
State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1635 |
State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 301 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 644 |
State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Literary (max 18)DATA HOUSE: | 13 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)DATA HOUSE: | 16 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 656 |
State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Informational (max 18)DATA HOUSE: | 13 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)DATA HOUSE: | 10 |
State average: | 10 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreDATA HOUSE: | 681 |
State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Functional (max 18)DATA HOUSE: | 14 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)DATA HOUSE: | 7 |
State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of StudentsDATA HOUSE: | 266 |
State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale ScoreDATA HOUSE: | 661 |
State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)DATA HOUSE: | 14 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 15
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 285 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 47%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 47%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 67%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 1
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 4
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 4
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Fort Pierce, FL
- Data House School in Fort Pierce, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: