City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
95.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Global Leaf School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
Duval County: | 44 |
Jacksonville: | 43 |
Global Leaf School: | 95 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (904) 945-0466 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 16
School number: 1211
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: DUVAL
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Principal: Debbie Hodge
Regular charter school.
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingGLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 88% |
State average from 613 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 89% |
State average from 612 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 95% |
State average from 613 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceGLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 71% |
State average from 612 schools: | 51% |
Making Reading Gains GLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 70% |
State average from 613 schools: | 64% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 69% |
State average from 612 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 65% |
State average from 613 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 66% |
State average from 613 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 613 |
State average from 613 schools: | 545 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 613 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 36% |
State average from 614 schools: | 56% |
Minority RateHere: | 16% |
State average from 614 schools: | 49% |
Region: 4
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 785 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 785 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 278
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 742
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 700
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 83% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 742
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 700
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 668 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 668 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 230
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 639
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 607
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 638
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 606
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 281 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 281 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 85
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 75% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 257
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 248
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 73% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 257
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 248
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 140 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 140 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 93% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientGLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 62% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 127
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 57% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 127
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 90% |
State average from 613 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 88% |
State average from 613 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 97% |
State average from 613 schools: | 92% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 72% |
State average from 613 schools: | 49% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 74% |
State average from 613 schools: | 66% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 74% |
State average from 613 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading GLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 75% |
State average from 613 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 74% |
State average from 613 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 644 |
State average from 613 schools: | 553 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 613 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 32% |
State average from 613 schools: | 52% |
Minority RateHere: | 14% |
State average from 613 schools: | 48% |
Region: 4
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 787 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 787 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 228
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 742
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 708
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 83% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 742
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 706
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 687 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 687 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 205
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 650
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 621
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 650
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 620
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 248 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 248 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 63
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 79% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 228
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 220
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 76% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 228
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 218
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 140 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 140 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 62% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 125
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 58% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 124
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 87% |
State average from 603 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 89% |
State average from 603 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 94% |
State average from 603 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 67% |
State average from 602 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 72% |
State average from 602 schools: | 65% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 82% |
State average from 602 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 70% |
State average from 602 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 77% |
State average from 602 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 638 |
State average from 602 schools: | 543 |
Percent TestedHere: | 99% |
State average from 604 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 26% |
State average from 605 schools: | 49% |
Minority RateHere: | 12% |
State average from 605 schools: | 48% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 820 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 820 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 266
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 81% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 796
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 763
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 82% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 794
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 761
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 730 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 730 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 239
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 83% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 710
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 679
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 709
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 678
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 196 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 196 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 89% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 61
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientGLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 69% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 189
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 182
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 66% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 187
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 180
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 134 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 134 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientGLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 69% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 130
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 126
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 51% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 125
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1428 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 321 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 12% |
State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 36% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 37% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 79% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9GLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 5 |
State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreGLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 1767 |
State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500GLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 351 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 30% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 48% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 16% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveGLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 94% |
State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2GLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 3 |
State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreGLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 1724 |
State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 323 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 10% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 13% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 22% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 45% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveGLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 77% |
State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9GLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 4 |
State average: | 3 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1925 |
State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 350 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 31% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 41% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 92% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1965 |
State average: | 1810 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 347 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 12% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 33% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 34% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 85% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1999 |
State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 334 |
State average: | 308 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 25% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 35% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 27% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 70% |
State average: | 52% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 331 |
State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1GLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 11% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 20% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 50% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 17% |
State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 68% |
State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500GLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 344 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 28% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 42% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 63% |
State average: | 41% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1503 |
State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 344 |
State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3GLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 34% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 38% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 13% |
State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 84% |
State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1663 |
State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 347 |
State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 11% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 33% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 47% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 88% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7GLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1676 |
State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 335 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 14% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 17% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 32% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 34% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 68% |
State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1878 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 357 |
State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 30% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 40% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveGLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 87% |
State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreGLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 1909 |
State average: | 1786 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 336 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 12% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 35% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 27% |
State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveGLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 79% |
State average: | 57% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1978 |
State average: | 1892 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500GLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 341 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2GLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 10% |
State average: | 21% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 42% |
State average: | 38% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 30% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 16% |
State average: | 10% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 87% |
State average: | 64% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7GLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1525 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 337 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1733 |
State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 346 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 07%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 07%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1773 |
State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500GLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 332 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1874 |
State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 341 |
State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1945 |
State average: | 1800 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 343 |
State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1981 |
State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 330 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 337 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 340 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1566 |
State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 358 |
State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1661 |
State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 347 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1752 |
State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 351 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1885 |
State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 359 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1913 |
State average: | 1799 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 337 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1963 |
State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 337 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 91
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedGLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 5 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 11%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 92%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 150
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 5 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 18%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 23%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 95%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1520 |
State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 336 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1694 |
State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 339 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 21
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1715 |
State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 322 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreGLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 1841 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 335 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1902 |
State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 335 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1968 |
State average: | 1857 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500GLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 327 |
State average: | 304 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 325 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 335 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1589 |
State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 362 |
State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1651 |
State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 345 |
State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1721 |
State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 344 |
State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1805 |
State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 340 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1904 |
State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 335 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1985 |
State average: | 1882 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 343 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 100 |
State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 650 |
State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Literary (max 18)GLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 14 |
State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)GLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 15 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 663 |
State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)GLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 10 |
State average: | 10 |
Interpretation (max 20)GLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 16 |
State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)GLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 8 |
State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsGLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 113 |
State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 679 |
State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Literary (max 18)GLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 14 |
State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)GLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 15 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)GLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 16 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of StudentsGLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 171 |
State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 690 |
State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)GLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 9 |
State average: | 8 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)GLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 8 |
State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 151 |
State average: | 201 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 697 |
State average from 2487 schools: | 682 |
Median NPRGLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 79 |
State average: | 66 |
Literary (max 18)GLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 15 |
State average: | 14 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)GLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 10 |
State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)GLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 15 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 152 |
State average: | 192 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 710 |
State average from 2497 schools: | 687 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)GLOBAL LEAF SCHOOL: | 12 |
State average: | 10 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 119
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 333 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 83%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 89%
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 159
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 314 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 64%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Jacksonville, FL
- Global Leaf School in Jacksonville, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: