Hooper Avenue Elementary School in Los Angeles, CA
(01-05 • Public • Regular School)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in California) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 9
- Address
- 1225 E. 52nd St.
Los Angeles, CA 90011
- Telephone
- (323) 232-3571
(make sure to verify first before calling)
- City-data.com school rating
- 9
- Students
- 958
- Classroom Teachers (FTE)
- 41.0
- National School Lunch
Program (NSLP) Status - Yes, under Community Eligibility Option (CEO)
- Free lunch eligible students
- 834
- Reduced-price lunch
eligible students - 36
- School district
- Los Angeles Unified
- Charter school
- No
- Title I status
- Title I schoolwide school
- Magnet School Indicator
- No
- Shared Time Indicator
- Missing
- Adult education offered
- No
No street view available for this location
Ratings
This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
Hooper Avenue Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:California: | 46 |
Los Angeles County: | 44 |
Los Angeles: | 36 |
Hooper Avenue Elementary School: | 9 |
Students & Teachers
Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 958
Enrollment in 2015: 975
Enrollment in 2014: 939
Enrollment in 2013: 1,088
Enrollment in 2012: 1,238
Enrollment in 2011: 1,267
Enrollment in 2010: 1,253
Enrollment in 2009: 1,365
Enrollment in 2008: 1,356
Enrollment in 2007: 1,401
Enrollment in 2006: 1,515
Enrollment in 2005: 1,948
Enrollment in 2004: 1,957
Enrollment in 2003: 1,918
Enrollment in 2002: 1,991
Enrollment in 2001: 1,915
Enrollment in 2000: 1,861
Enrollment in 1999: 1,944
Hooper Avenue Elementary School - Historical enrollment
Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
Grade | G01 | G02 | G03 | G04 | G05 | Total |
---|
All students | 192 | 218 | 179 | 188 | 181 | 958 |
Female students | 106 | 111 | 78 | 94 | 79 | 468 |
Male students | 86 | 107 | 101 | 94 | 102 | 490 |
Hispanic students | 174 | 199 | 167 | 178 | 171 | 889 |
Black students | 12 | 18 | 12 | 9 | 9 | 60 |
White students | 5 | - | - | 1 | - | 6 |
Two or More Races students | 1 | 1 | - | - | 1 | 3 |
Enrollment by grade:
1st grade enrollment: 192
2nd grade enrollment: 218
3rd grade enrollment: 179
4th grade enrollment: 188
5th grade enrollment: 181
Hooper Avenue Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade
Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
Female enrollment: 468 (48.9%)Hooper Avenue Elementary School: | 48.9% |
State: | 49.4% |
Male enrollment: 490 (51.1%)Hooper Avenue Elementary School: | 51.1% |
State: | 49.6% |
Hooper Avenue Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender
Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
Hispanic enrollment: 889 (92.8%)Hooper Avenue Elementary School: | 92.8% |
State: | 46.0% |
Black enrollment: 60 (6.3%)School: | 6.3% |
California: | 6.1% |
White enrollment: 6 (0.6%)School: | 0.6% |
California: | 28.3% |
Two or More Races enrollment: 3 (0.3%)Hooper Avenue Elementary School: | 0.3% |
State: | 4.5% |
Hooper Avenue Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity
Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 10,111 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 870 (90.8%)Hooper Avenue Elementary School: | 90.8% |
State: | 61.2% |
Free lunch eligible students: 834 (87.1%)Hooper Avenue Elementary School: | 87.1% |
California: | 52.8% |
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 36 (3.8%)School: | 3.8% |
California: | 8.6% |
Hooper Avenue Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility
Teachers and support:
(State average from 12,394 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 41
Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE school counselors: 2
Number of FTE nurses: 2
Number of FTE psychologists: 3
Student/Teacher RatioSchool: | 23.4 |
California: | 22.8 |
Hooper Avenue Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio
School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds:
$3,573,265- Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 36.3 (Salary Expenditures: $2,970,151)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 0.7 (Salary Expenditures: $58,121)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 2.9 (Salary Expenditures: $315,073)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $229,919)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds:
$316,423Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,:
$4,937,177- Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $3,602,206
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 24.3 (Salary Expenditures: $509,944)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 2.9 (Salary Expenditures: $544,917)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $280,110)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds:
$355,363 Limited English Proficiency:
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs
- Hispanic505
- Black2
- White4
- IDEA61
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 511 (male: 274, female: 237)
- Hispanic: 505 (male: 272, female: 233)
- Black: 2 (all female)
- White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 61 (male: 50, female: 11)
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 549 (male: 304, female: 245)
- Hispanic: 547 (male: 302, female: 245)
- Black: 2 (all male)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 64 (male: 47, female: 17)
Students with disabilities:
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 79 (male: 62, female: 17)
- Hispanic: 71 (male: 58, female: 13)
- Black: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 62 (male: 49, female: 13)
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 78 (male: 59, female: 19)
- Hispanic: 71 (male: 52, female: 19)
- Black: 7 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 68 (male: 49, female: 19)
Retention:
(State average from 1,534 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Percent of 2nd grade students retained
Gifted and Talented:
(State average from 5,551 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 19 (male: 8, female: 11)
- Hispanic: 19 (male: 8, female: 11)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 studentsHooper Avenue Elementary School: | 19.8 |
State: | 84.3 |
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 48 (male: 28, female: 20)
- Hispanic: 46 (male: 26, female: 20)
- Black: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Statewide Student Assessments
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments:
(State average from 10,463 schools)
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments (SB) is one of the online summative assessments - part of California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System.
The summative assessments are comprehensive, end-of-year assessments of grade-level learning that measure progress toward college and career readiness. Each test in English language arts/literacy (ELA) and mathematics is comprised of two parts: (1) a computer-adaptive test and (2) a performance task, administered within a selected testing window available at 66 percent of the instructional year for grades three through eight, and grade eleven.
The summative assessments are aligned with the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for ELA and mathematics. The tests capitalize on the strengths of computer adaptive testing efficient and precise measurement across the full range of achievement and timely turnaround of results.
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All18%
- Males15%
- Females20%
- Black7%
- Hispanic18%
ELA students tested: 539
ELA students with scores: 533
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 18% |
State: | 49% |
Standard Not Met:
61.9%Standard Nearly Met:
20.4%Standard Met:
13.5%Standard Exceeded:
4.1%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2348.4, Students tested: 199, Standard Not Met: 62.6%, Nearly Met: 20.2%, Met: 12.1%, Exceeded: 5.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2378.9, Students tested: 164, Standard Not Met: 68.3%, Nearly Met: 13.7%, Met: 14.3%, Exceeded: 3.7%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2424.5, Students tested: 176, Standard Not Met: 55.2%, Nearly Met: 27.0%, Met: 14.4%, Exceeded: 3.5%)Hooper Avenue Elementary School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All14%
- Males16%
- Females13%
- Hispanic15%
Math students tested: 542
Math students with scores: 541
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 14% |
State: | 38% |
Standard Not Met:
60.6%Standard Nearly Met:
24.9%Standard Met:
10.3%Standard Exceeded:
4.1%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2371.0, Students tested: 200, Standard Not Met: 60.0%, Nearly Met: 21.5%, Met: 14.5%, Exceeded: 4.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2401.5, Students tested: 164, Standard Not Met: 54.9%, Nearly Met: 32.3%, Met: 9.2%, Exceeded: 3.7%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2417.6, Students tested: 178, Standard Not Met: 66.7%, Nearly Met: 22.0%, Met: 6.8%, Exceeded: 4.5%)Hooper Avenue Elementary School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All16%
- Males13%
- Females19%
- Black8%
- Hispanic17%
ELA students tested: 541
ELA students with scores: 541
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 16% |
State: | 48% |
Standard Not Met:
67.0%Standard Nearly Met:
17.0%Standard Met:
11.0%Standard Exceeded:
5.0%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2346.2, Students tested: 180, Standard Not Met: 63.0%, Nearly Met: 21.0%, Met: 10.0%, Exceeded: 6.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2383.7, Students tested: 177, Standard Not Met: 68.0%, Nearly Met: 15.0%, Met: 12.0%, Exceeded: 5.0%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2408.3, Students tested: 184, Standard Not Met: 70.0%, Nearly Met: 15.0%, Met: 11.0%, Exceeded: 4.0%)Hooper Avenue Elementary School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All15%
- Males13%
- Females19%
- Black4%
- Hispanic16%
Math students tested: 541
Math students with scores: 539
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 15% |
California: | 37% |
Standard Not Met:
61.0%Standard Nearly Met:
24.0%Standard Met:
12.0%Standard Exceeded:
4.0%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2368.2, Students tested: 180, Standard Not Met: 59.0%, Nearly Met: 23.0%, Met: 14.0%, Exceeded: 4.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2401.4, Students tested: 177, Standard Not Met: 59.0%, Nearly Met: 29.0%, Met: 9.0%, Exceeded: 3.0%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2428.3, Students tested: 184, Standard Not Met: 65.0%, Nearly Met: 19.0%, Met: 12.0%, Exceeded: 4.0%)Hooper Avenue Elementary School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All10%
- Males9%
- Females12%
- Black5%
- Hispanic10%
ELA students tested: 588
ELA students with scores: 587
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 10% |
California: | 44% |
Standard Not Met:
71.0%Standard Nearly Met:
19.0%Standard Met:
9.0%Standard Exceeded:
1.0%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2340.6, Students tested: 208, Standard Not Met: 69.0%, Nearly Met: 21.0%, Met: 8.0%, Exceeded: 2.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2371.7, Students tested: 190, Standard Not Met: 76.0%, Nearly Met: 16.0%, Met: 8.0%, Exceeded: 1.0%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2410.8, Students tested: 190, Standard Not Met: 68.0%, Nearly Met: 20.0%, Met: 11.0%, Exceeded: 1.0%)Hooper Avenue Elementary School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All13%
- Males11%
- Females14%
- Hispanic13%
Math students tested: 585
Math students with scores: 580
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 13% |
California: | 34% |
Standard Not Met:
69.0%Standard Nearly Met:
19.0%Standard Met:
10.0%Standard Exceeded:
2.0%All Grades:
3rd Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2359.7, Students tested: 205, Standard Not Met: 65.0%, Nearly Met: 18.0%, Met: 15.0%, Exceeded: 2.0%)4th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2392.7, Students tested: 190, Standard Not Met: 62.0%, Nearly Met: 28.0%, Met: 10.0%, Exceeded: 1.0%)5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2414.9, Students tested: 190, Standard Not Met: 79.0%, Nearly Met: 11.0%, Met: 6.0%, Exceeded: 4.0%)Hooper Avenue Elementary School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
California Alternate Assessments:
(State average from 1,579 schools)
The new California Alternate Assessments (CAAs) are based on alternate achievement standards-called the Core Content Connectors-and linked to the Common Core State Standards. The CAAs are online tests for students with an individualized education program (IEP) that designates the use of an alternate assessment to measure student progress on alternate achievement standards. This alternate assessment is part of the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System and replaces the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) for English language arts and mathematics.
ELA students tested: 13
ELA students with scores: 13
Percentage Level 3: | 8% |
State: | 15% |
Level 1:
92.3% The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.Level 2:
0.0% The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts. Level 3:
7.7% The student showed understanding of core concepts.All Grades:
Math students tested: 13
Math students with scores: 13
Percentage Level 3: | 0% |
State: | 6% |
Level 1:
100.0% The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.Level 2:
0.0% The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts. Level 3:
0.0% The student showed understanding of core concepts.All Grades:
Paper-based CAASPP:
(State average from 9,784 schools)
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System includes paper-based tests:
California Standards Tests (CSTs) - The CSTs for science in grades five, eight, and ten are administered only to students in California public schools. All questions are multiple-choice. These tests were developed specifically to assess students' knowledge of the California content standards in science.
California Modified Assessment (CMA) - The CMA for science was administered to eligible students in grades five, eight, and ten. The CMA is a standards-based test for students with an individualized education program who meet the eligibility criteria adopted by the State Board of Education. The Elementary and Secondary Education Act called for a range of assessments appropriate to students' abilities. The CMA provides an appropriate assessment for a small percentage of students allowing them to demonstrate their knowledge of skills in the California academic content standards for science.
California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) - Students with significant cognitive disabilities who are unable to take the Smarter Balanced Field Test even with designated supports and accommodations participated in the CAASPP system by taking the CAPA. The CAPA is an individually administered performance assessment with all tasks linked to the California ELA, mathematics, and science content standards.
Standards-based Tests in Spanish (STS) - The STS consists of multiple-choice tests in Spanish that assess RLA in grades two through eleven. Local education agencies had the option of administering the STS for RLA to the Spanish-speaking English learners (ELs) in grades two through eleven who either were receiving instruction in Spanish or had been enrolled in school in the United States for less than 12 months when testing began.
CST Science students tested: 168
CST Science students with scores: 168
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 14% |
State: | 54% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
27.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
20.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
39.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
14.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
0.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 300.6, Students tested: 168, Far Below Basic: 27.0%, Below Basic: 20.0%, Basic: 39.0%, Proficient: 14.0%, Advanced: 0.0%)
CMA Science students tested: 17
CMA Science students with scores: 17
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 35% |
State: | 38% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
0.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
18.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
47.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
29.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
6.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 333.4, Students tested: 17, Far Below Basic: 0.0%, Below Basic: 18.0%, Basic: 47.0%, Proficient: 29.0%, Advanced: 6.0%) CST Science students tested: 164
CST Science students with scores: 164
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 20% |
California: | 56% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
15.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
24.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
41.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
18.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
2.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 312.5, Students tested: 164, Far Below Basic: 15.0%, Below Basic: 24.0%, Basic: 41.0%, Proficient: 18.0%, Advanced: 2.0%)
CMA Science students tested: 22
CMA Science students with scores: 21
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 43% |
California: | 38% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
0.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
33.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
24.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
38.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
5.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 329.4, Students tested: 22, Far Below Basic: 0.0%, Below Basic: 33.0%, Basic: 24.0%, Proficient: 38.0%, Advanced: 5.0%) CAPA English-Language Arts students tested: 14
CAPA English-Language Arts students with scores: 14
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 64% |
California: | 82% |
CAPA Mathematics students tested: 14
CAPA Mathematics students with scores: 14
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 29% |
California: | 68% |
CST Science students tested: 151
CST Science students with scores: 150
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 15% |
State: | 60% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
21.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
32.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
32.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
14.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
1.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 301.6, Students tested: 151, Far Below Basic: 21.0%, Below Basic: 32.0%, Basic: 32.0%, Proficient: 14.0%, Advanced: 1.0%)
STS Reading-Language Arts students tested: 14
STS Reading-Language Arts students with scores: 14
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 36% |
State: | 27% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
0.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
50.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
14.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
21.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
14.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.:
(Mean Scale Score: 321.7, Students tested: 14, Far Below Basic: 0.0%, Below Basic: 50.0%, Basic: 14.0%, Proficient: 21.0%, Advanced: 14.0%)
CMA Science students tested: 16
CMA Science students with scores: 16
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 13% |
California: | 39% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
24.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
44.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
19.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
6.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
6.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.5th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 286.8, Students tested: 16, Far Below Basic: 24.0%, Below Basic: 44.0%, Basic: 19.0%, Proficient: 6.0%, Advanced: 6.0%) The Physical Fitness Test:
The Physical Fitness Test (PFT) for students in California schools is the FITNESSGRAM. The main goal of the test is to help students in starting life-long habits of regular physical activity.
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 182, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 45.1%, Needs Improvement: 51.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 3.3%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 182, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 48.9%, Needs Improvement: 23.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 27.5%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 182, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 44.5%, Needs Improvement: 55.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 182, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 92.9%, Needs Improvement: 7.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 182, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 65.9%, Needs Improvement: 34.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 182, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 79.7%, Needs Improvement: 20.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 186, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 43.0%, Needs Improvement: 48.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 8.6%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 186, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 37.6%, Needs Improvement: 24.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 38.2%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 186, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 45.2%, Needs Improvement: 54.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 186, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 94.6%, Needs Improvement: 5.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 186, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 58.1%, Needs Improvement: 41.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 186, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 74.7%, Needs Improvement: 25.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 190, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 49.5%, Needs Improvement: 44.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 6.3%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 190, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 44.2%, Needs Improvement: 20.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 35.3%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 190, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 31.1%, Needs Improvement: 68.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 190, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 95.8%, Needs Improvement: 4.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 190, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 50.5%, Needs Improvement: 49.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 190, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 68.4%, Needs Improvement: 31.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 172, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 36.6%, Needs Improvement: 50.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 13.4%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 172, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 32.0%, Needs Improvement: 18.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 49.4%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 172, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 72.1%, Needs Improvement: 27.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 172, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 97.1%, Needs Improvement: 2.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 172, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 64.0%, Needs Improvement: 36.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 172, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 70.3%, Needs Improvement: 29.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 235, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 43.0%, Needs Improvement: 31.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 25.9%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 235, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 31.5%, Needs Improvement: 19.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 48.9%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 235, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 74.5%, Needs Improvement: 25.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 235, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 95.3%, Needs Improvement: 4.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 235, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 64.7%, Needs Improvement: 35.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 235, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 65.5%, Needs Improvement: 34.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:5th grade:
(Students tested: 237, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 61.2%, Needs Improvement: 19.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 19.0%)
Body Composition:5th grade:
(Students tested: 237, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 43.5%, Needs Improvement: 13.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 43.4%)
Abdominal Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 237, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 89.9%, Needs Improvement: 10.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 237, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 98.3%, Needs Improvement: 1.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:5th grade:
(Students tested: 237, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 53.6%, Needs Improvement: 46.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:5th grade:
(Students tested: 237, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 63.7%, Needs Improvement: 36.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
California English Language Development Test:
(State average from 9,932 schools)
Students in kindergarten through grade twelve whose home language is not English are required by law to take an English skills test. In California, the test is called the California English Language Development Test (CELDT).
Hooper Avenue Elementary School - students who met CELDT criterion (all grades)
All Grades:Student Count: 518
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 157
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 30.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Grade 1:Student Count: 140
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 83
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 59.0% |
State: | 44.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 472.1 |
California: | 439.9 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 394.4 |
State: | 383.8 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 465.9 |
State: | 446.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 406.6 |
California: | 386.5 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 116
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 16
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 14.0% |
California: | 27.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 475.7 |
State: | 477.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 421.9 |
State: | 440.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 482.9 |
California: | 483.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 456.8 |
California: | 456.4 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 98
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 9
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 9.0% |
State: | 26.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 459.6 |
State: | 475.9 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 432.1 |
State: | 459.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 532.7 |
California: | 491.7 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 451.3 |
State: | 478.6 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 70
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 15
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 21.0% |
State: | 37.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 485.0 |
State: | 509.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 461.2 |
State: | 490.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 517.4 |
State: | 515.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 482.6 |
California: | 502.2 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 94
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 34
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 36.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 499.3 |
State: | 533.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 500.3 |
State: | 514.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 517.0 |
California: | 530.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 502.0 |
California: | 519.1 |
All Grades:Student Count: 555
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 157
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 28.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Grade 1:Student Count: 132
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 67
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 51.0% |
State: | 42.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 447.9 |
California: | 437.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 398.1 |
California: | 382.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 463.6 |
State: | 443.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 407.0 |
California: | 383.8 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 134
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 16
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 12.0% |
California: | 27.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 468.6 |
California: | 478.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 415.6 |
California: | 441.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 469.2 |
State: | 482.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 439.9 |
California: | 458.7 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 103
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 27
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 26.0% |
State: | 26.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 464.8 |
State: | 475.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 453.6 |
State: | 461.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 499.9 |
California: | 493.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 460.5 |
California: | 479.8 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 115
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 32
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 28.0% |
State: | 37.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 491.8 |
State: | 511.0 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 474.9 |
State: | 494.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 505.1 |
California: | 515.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 485.9 |
California: | 504.8 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 71
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 15
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 21.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 481.3 |
State: | 533.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 478.6 |
State: | 515.8 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 525.1 |
California: | 527.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 486.8 |
California: | 519.3 |
All Grades:Student Count: 542
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 136
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 25.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Grade 1:Student Count: 140
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 76
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 54.0% |
State: | 40.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 453.5 |
State: | 434.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 389.3 |
State: | 380.8 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 447.8 |
State: | 443.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 403.7 |
State: | 386.6 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 113
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 17
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 15.0% |
State: | 27.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 473.7 |
California: | 477.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 409.8 |
California: | 442.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 483.9 |
State: | 483.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 440.4 |
State: | 459.9 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 136
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 23
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 17.0% |
State: | 28.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 452.8 |
California: | 478.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 429.9 |
State: | 464.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 522.5 |
California: | 494.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 463.0 |
California: | 486.2 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 80
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 6
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 8.0% |
State: | 36.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 431.0 |
California: | 509.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 440.8 |
State: | 494.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 490.5 |
California: | 515.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 453.1 |
State: | 505.6 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 73
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 14
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 19.0% |
State: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 493.2 |
California: | 535.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 480.8 |
California: | 519.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 530.1 |
California: | 532.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 493.5 |
California: | 523.7 |
All Grades:Student Count: 565
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 197
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 35.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Grade 1:Student Count: 136
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 88
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 65.0% |
California: | 37.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 468.9 |
California: | 432.0 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 396.2 |
State: | 380.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 474.9 |
California: | 438.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 396.9 |
State: | 383.8 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 174
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 38
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 22.0% |
California: | 27.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 493.5 |
State: | 476.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 426.6 |
California: | 444.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 485.8 |
California: | 481.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 447.7 |
State: | 461.7 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 127
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 49
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 39.0% |
California: | 29.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 480.9 |
California: | 478.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 464.3 |
California: | 470.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 509.0 |
California: | 494.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 471.4 |
State: | 487.2 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 66
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 6
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 9.0% |
State: | 38.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 455.7 |
California: | 512.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 445.5 |
State: | 499.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 497.6 |
California: | 514.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 464.3 |
California: | 509.1 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 62
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 16
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 26.0% |
State: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 476.8 |
State: | 534.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 459.7 |
State: | 521.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 503.6 |
California: | 531.7 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 481.1 |
California: | 525.0 |
All Grades:Student Count: 644
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 230
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 36.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Grade 1:Student Count: 183
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 76
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 42.0% |
State: | 35.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 452.7 |
California: | 428.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 391.8 |
State: | 393.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 439.3 |
State: | 429.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 412.8 |
State: | 405.0 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 174
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 50
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 29.0% |
State: | 28.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 492.9 |
California: | 483.4 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 440.9 |
California: | 444.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 483.9 |
California: | 477.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 466.1 |
State: | 468.9 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 129
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 63
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 49.0% |
California: | 30.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 497.5 |
State: | 482.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 501.5 |
State: | 482.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 494.6 |
State: | 483.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 498.2 |
California: | 496.8 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 75
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 14
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 19.0% |
State: | 35.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 460.5 |
State: | 511.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 457.9 |
California: | 506.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 490.4 |
California: | 501.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 472.0 |
State: | 514.3 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 83
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 27
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 33.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 491.9 |
California: | 537.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 491.1 |
California: | 528.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 521.6 |
State: | 517.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 500.0 |
State: | 531.8 |
All Grades:Student Count: 776
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 256
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 33.0% |
California: | 35.0% |
Grade 1:Student Count: 215
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 81
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 38.0% |
California: | 35.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 445.0 |
California: | 428.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 387.2 |
State: | 391.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 428.5 |
State: | 434.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 408.0 |
California: | 405.5 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 161
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 13
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 8.0% |
California: | 25.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 471.9 |
State: | 478.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 419.3 |
California: | 442.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 450.7 |
California: | 478.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 444.3 |
State: | 465.8 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 142
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 61
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 43.0% |
State: | 32.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 482.7 |
State: | 493.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 482.4 |
California: | 482.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 497.5 |
State: | 486.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 487.0 |
State: | 494.3 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 133
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 44
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 33.0% |
State: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 493.0 |
State: | 522.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 494.1 |
California: | 510.8 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 500.9 |
California: | 505.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 494.3 |
California: | 512.8 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 125
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 57
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 46.0% |
State: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 524.4 |
State: | 544.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 517.4 |
State: | 531.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 529.5 |
State: | 519.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 514.1 |
State: | 527.0 |
All Grades:Student Count: 824
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 228
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 28.0% |
California: | 31.0% |
Grade 1:Student Count: 214
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 78
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 36.0% |
State: | 32.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 437.2 |
State: | 423.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 391.9 |
California: | 389.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 423.3 |
State: | 431.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 409.1 |
California: | 402.3 |
Grade 2:Student Count: 164
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 15
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 9.0% |
State: | 24.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 467.9 |
California: | 466.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 414.3 |
State: | 440.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 469.7 |
State: | 484.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 441.5 |
State: | 452.2 |
Grade 3:Student Count: 157
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 44
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 28.0% |
State: | 25.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 470.5 |
State: | 468.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 452.3 |
State: | 471.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 482.9 |
California: | 486.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 470.5 |
State: | 484.8 |
Grade 4:Student Count: 151
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 36
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 24.0% |
State: | 33.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 483.6 |
State: | 504.0 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 471.4 |
California: | 503.1 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 491.2 |
California: | 505.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 484.4 |
State: | 506.6 |
Grade 5:Student Count: 135
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 55
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 41.0% |
State: | 44.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 511.8 |
California: | 528.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 514.4 |
California: | 526.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 538.4 |
State: | 517.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 513.4 |
California: | 524.0 |
Accountability
Adequate Yearly Progress:
(State average from 9,846 schools)
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) - Accountability system mandated by federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Statistics are based on test results of the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program, the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE), and the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA).
Hooper Avenue Elementary School - Adequate Yearly Progress status
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- Asian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED99
- LEP99
- With Disabilities94
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 509 out of 513 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 26 out of 26 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 513 out of 517 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 429 out of 432 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 94% (tested 42 out of 45 enrolled)
Math Participation RateSchool: | 99.0% |
California: | 96.1% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- Asian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED99
- LEP99
- With Disabilities94
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 507 out of 513 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 26 out of 26 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 511 out of 517 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 428 out of 432 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 94% (tested 42 out of 45 enrolled)
Met all AYP Criteria: Yes
Number of AYP criteria met: 9
Number of AYP criteria possible: 9
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)Attendance rate (calculated by using number of days attended and enrolled) : 97
Met Attendance rate Target: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- Asian100
- Black97
- White100
- SED99
- LEP100
- With Disabilities97
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 563 out of 567 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 97% (tested 25 out of 26 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 569 out of 574 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 450 out of 452 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 97% (tested 74 out of 77 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic11
- Black10
- SED10
- LEP8
- Hispanic: 11% (57 out of 525 valid scores)
- Black: 10% (2 out of 20 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 10% (55 out of 534 valid scores)
- English Learners: 8% (35 out of 421 valid scores)
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic98
- Asian100
- Black97
- White100
- SED98
- LEP98
- With Disabilities90
- Hispanic: 98% (tested 555 out of 565 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 97% (tested 25 out of 26 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 98% (tested 562 out of 572 enrolled)
- English Learners: 98% (tested 444 out of 452 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 90% (tested 68 out of 76 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic14
- SED13
- LEP12
- With Disabilities2
- Hispanic: 14% (71 out of 522 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 13% (69 out of 531 valid scores)
- English Learners: 12% (51 out of 418 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 2% (1 out of 55 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 10
Number of AYP criteria possible: 19
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 89.2%
ELA Participation RateSchool: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 783 out of 784 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 59 out of 59 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 766 out of 767 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 630 out of 631 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 109 out of 109 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveHooper Avenue Elementary School: | 26.4% |
California: | 55.7% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic27
- Black22
- SED26
- LEP24
- With Disabilities22
- Hispanic: 27% (197 out of 741 valid scores)
- Black: 22% (11 out of 49 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 26% (192 out of 733 valid scores)
- English Learners: 24% (143 out of 606 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 22% (22 out of 101 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 89.5%
Math Participation RateSchool: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.2% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 783 out of 784 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 59 out of 59 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 766 out of 767 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 630 out of 631 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 109 out of 109 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic41
- Black25
- SED40
- LEP38
- With Disabilities27
- Hispanic: 41% (302 out of 741 valid scores)
- Black: 25% (12 out of 49 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 40% (293 out of 733 valid scores)
- English Learners: 38% (233 out of 606 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 27% (27 out of 101 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 12
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 78.4%
ELA Participation RateHere: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Black99
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 919 out of 919 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 99% (tested 64 out of 65 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 843 out of 844 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 780 out of 780 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 150 out of 151 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveHooper Avenue Elementary School: | 29.9% |
California: | 57.4% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic30
- Black29
- SED30
- LEP29
- With Disabilities23
- Hispanic: 30% (259 out of 865 valid scores)
- Black: 29% (15 out of 51 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 30% (233 out of 790 valid scores)
- English Learners: 29% (213 out of 742 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 23% (32 out of 141 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 79%
Math Participation RateHooper Avenue Elementary School: | 100.0% |
State: | 98.1% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Black99
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 919 out of 919 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 99% (tested 64 out of 65 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 843 out of 844 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 780 out of 780 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 150 out of 151 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic45
- Black28
- SED44
- LEP44
- With Disabilities31
- Hispanic: 45% (391 out of 865 valid scores)
- Black: 28% (14 out of 51 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 44% (345 out of 790 valid scores)
- English Learners: 44% (327 out of 742 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 31% (44 out of 141 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 16
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 67.6%
ELA Participation RateSchool: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 950 out of 950 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 69 out of 69 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,020 out of 1,020 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 795 out of 795 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 132 out of 132 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic28
- Black22
- SED28
- LEP26
- With Disabilities15
- Hispanic: 28% (250 out of 895 valid scores)
- Black: 22% (13 out of 59 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 28% (263 out of 955 valid scores)
- English Learners: 26% (195 out of 761 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 15% (18 out of 124 valid scores)
Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 68.5%
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 950 out of 950 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 69 out of 69 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,020 out of 1,020 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 795 out of 795 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 132 out of 132 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 46.2% |
California: | 59.3% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic48
- Black24
- SED46
- LEP48
- With Disabilities32
- Hispanic: 48% (427 out of 895 valid scores)
- Black: 24% (14 out of 59 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 46% (441 out of 955 valid scores)
- English Learners: 48% (362 out of 761 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 32% (39 out of 124 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 11
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 56.8%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 958 out of 958 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 66 out of 66 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,025 out of 1,025 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 808 out of 808 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 120 out of 120 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 27.1% |
California: | 53.7% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic27
- Black30
- SED27
- LEP24
- With Disabilities12
- Hispanic: 27% (243 out of 901 valid scores)
- Black: 30% (17 out of 57 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 27% (260 out of 959 valid scores)
- English Learners: 24% (184 out of 768 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 12% (14 out of 113 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 58%
Math Participation RateHooper Avenue Elementary School: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.1% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 955 out of 957 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 66 out of 66 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,022 out of 1,024 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 806 out of 807 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 120 out of 120 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 41.2% |
California: | 57.1% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic42
- Black28
- SED41
- LEP40
- With Disabilities18
- Hispanic: 42% (378 out of 899 valid scores)
- Black: 28% (16 out of 57 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 41% (394 out of 957 valid scores)
- English Learners: 40% (308 out of 767 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 18% (20 out of 113 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 9
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 46%
ELA Participation RateSchool: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 997 out of 997 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 62 out of 62 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,063 out of 1,063 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 854 out of 854 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 114 out of 114 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveHooper Avenue Elementary School: | 21.2% |
California: | 52.4% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic21
- Black28
- SED21
- LEP19
- With Disabilities10
- Hispanic: 21% (192 out of 927 valid scores)
- Black: 28% (15 out of 53 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 21% (209 out of 984 valid scores)
- English Learners: 19% (149 out of 801 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 10% (10 out of 103 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 47.5%
Math Participation RateHooper Avenue Elementary School: | 100.0% |
State: | 98.2% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black99
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 992 out of 995 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 99% (tested 61 out of 62 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,057 out of 1,061 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 850 out of 852 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 113 out of 114 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic38
- Black28
- SED37
- LEP36
- With Disabilities13
- Hispanic: 38% (347 out of 922 valid scores)
- Black: 28% (15 out of 53 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 37% (363 out of 979 valid scores)
- English Learners: 36% (289 out of 797 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 13% (13 out of 103 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 9
Number of AYP criteria possible: 17
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 35.2%
ELA Participation RateHooper Avenue Elementary School: | 100.0% |
State: | 98.1% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black99
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 996 out of 998 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 99% (tested 58 out of 59 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 995 out of 997 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 830 out of 832 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 110 out of 111 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveHooper Avenue Elementary School: | 16.8% |
California: | 48.6% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic17
- Black16
- SED17
- LEP14
- With Disabilities4
- Hispanic: 17% (156 out of 924 valid scores)
- Black: 16% (8 out of 49 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 17% (153 out of 922 valid scores)
- English Learners: 14% (112 out of 784 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 4% (4 out of 104 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 37%
Math Participation RateHere: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.0% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black99
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 996 out of 998 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 99% (tested 58 out of 59 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 995 out of 997 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 830 out of 832 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 110 out of 111 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic37
- Black29
- SED35
- LEP35
- With Disabilities14
- Hispanic: 37% (340 out of 924 valid scores)
- Black: 29% (14 out of 49 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 35% (326 out of 922 valid scores)
- English Learners: 35% (271 out of 784 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 14% (14 out of 104 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 15
Number of AYP criteria possible: 19
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Black98
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities97
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,050 out of 1,051 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 98% (tested 67 out of 69 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,092 out of 1,095 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 890 out of 891 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 97% (tested 115 out of 118 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic16
- Black17
- SED16
- LEP13
- With Disabilities4
- Hispanic: 16% (156 out of 961 valid scores)
- Black: 17% (9 out of 54 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 16% (160 out of 993 valid scores)
- English Learners: 13% (106 out of 827 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 4% (4 out of 108 valid scores)
Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation RateSchool: | 100.0% |
California: | 97.9% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Black98
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities97
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,049 out of 1,051 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 98% (tested 67 out of 69 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,091 out of 1,095 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 889 out of 891 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 97% (tested 114 out of 118 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveHooper Avenue Elementary School: | 33.4% |
California: | 50.5% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic34
- Black15
- SED33
- LEP32
- With Disabilities13
- Hispanic: 34% (330 out of 960 valid scores)
- Black: 15% (8 out of 54 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 33% (330 out of 992 valid scores)
- English Learners: 32% (264 out of 826 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 13% (14 out of 107 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 16
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation RateHere: | 100.0% |
California: | 97.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black98
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities97
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,128 out of 1,130 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 98% (tested 78 out of 80 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,159 out of 1,163 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 969 out of 971 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 97% (tested 107 out of 110 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveHooper Avenue Elementary School: | 13.8% |
California: | 45.9% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic14
- Black13
- SED14
- LEP12
- With Disabilities2
- Hispanic: 14% (144 out of 1,034 valid scores)
- Black: 13% (9 out of 68 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 14% (144 out of 1,061 valid scores)
- English Learners: 12% (109 out of 919 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 2% (2 out of 105 valid scores)
Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation RateSchool: | 100.0% |
California: | 97.5% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black97
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities96
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,128 out of 1,130 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 97% (tested 77 out of 80 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,158 out of 1,163 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 969 out of 971 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 96% (tested 106 out of 110 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Black19
- SED33
- LEP32
- With Disabilities7
- Black: 19% (13 out of 67 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 33% (349 out of 1,060 valid scores)
- English Learners: 32% (292 out of 919 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 7% (7 out of 104 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 16
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation RateHooper Avenue Elementary School: | 100.0% |
State: | 99.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Black99
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,176 out of 1,179 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 99% (tested 79 out of 80 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,257 out of 1,261 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 1,042 out of 1,043 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 122 out of 123 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic13
- Black14
- SED13
- LEP11
- With Disabilities3
- Hispanic: 13% (138 out of 1,096 valid scores)
- Black: 14% (9 out of 66 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 13% (148 out of 1,163 valid scores)
- English Learners: 11% (108 out of 998 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 3% (3 out of 116 valid scores)
Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation RateHere: | 100.0% |
California: | 99.2% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Black98
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,175 out of 1,179 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 98% (tested 78 out of 80 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,255 out of 1,261 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 1,041 out of 1,043 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 122 out of 123 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 27.6% |
California: | 49.3% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic28
- Black22
- SED28
- LEP27
- With Disabilities9
- Hispanic: 28% (305 out of 1,095 valid scores)
- Black: 22% (14 out of 65 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 28% (320 out of 1,161 valid scores)
- English Learners: 27% (268 out of 997 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 9% (10 out of 116 valid scores)
Health & Safety
Referrals and Arrests:
(State average from 2,295 schools)
Referral to law enforcement is an action by which a student is reported to any law enforcement agency or official, including a school police unit, for an incident that occurs on school grounds, during school-related events, or while taking school transportation, regardless of whether official action is taken. Citations, tickets, court referrals, and school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.
School-related arrest refers to an arrest of a student for any activity conducted on school grounds, during off-campus school activities (including while taking school transportation), or due to a referral by any school official. All school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.
Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official: 2 (all female)
Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official per 1,000 students
Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 2 (all male)
- Black: 2 (all female)
Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official per 1,000 studentsHooper Avenue Elementary School: | 4.2 |
State: | 27.2 |
Harassment & Bullying:
(State average from 2,337 schools)
An allegation is a claim or assertion that someone has done something wrong or illegal, typically made without proof.
Harassment or bullying on the basis of sex includes sexual harassment or bullying and gender-based harassment or bullying. Sexual harassment or bullying is unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature, such as unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal, nonverbal, or physical conduct of a sexual nature. Gender-based harassment or bullying is nonsexual intimidation or abusive behavior toward a student based on the student's actual or perceived sex, including harassment based on gender identity, gender expression, and nonconformity with gender stereotypes. Harassing conduct may take many forms, including verbal acts and name-calling, as well as non-verbal behavior, such as graphic and written statements, or conduct that is physically threatening, harmful or humiliating. The conduct can be carried out by school employees, other students, and non-employee third parties. Both male and female students can be victims of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex, and the harasser or bully and the victim can be of the same sex. Bullying on the basis of sex constitutes sexual harassment.
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex: 4
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex per 1,000 students
Students reported as harassed or bullied on the basis of sex
- Hispanic2
- Black2
- Multirace2
- IDEA2
Students reported as harassed or bullied on the basis of sex: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 2 (all male)
- Black: 2 (all female)
- Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all female)
Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
(State average from 8,737 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.
Chronic Student Absenteeism
- Hispanic106
- Black25
- White2
- LEP46
- IDEA19
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 133 (male: 67, female: 66)
- Hispanic: 106 (male: 53, female: 53)
- Black: 25 (male: 14, female: 11)
- White: 2 (all female)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 46 (male: 26, female: 20)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 19 (male: 11, female: 8)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 studentsHooper Avenue Elementary School: | 138.8 |
State: | 172.7 |
Chronic Student Absenteeism
- Hispanic55
- Black10
- LEP28
- IDEA7
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 65 (male: 34, female: 31)
- Hispanic: 55 (male: 29, female: 26)
- Black: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 28 (male: 14, female: 14)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 studentsSchool: | 67.8 |
California: | 178.2 |
Suspensions:
(State average from 1,406 schools)
Out-of-school suspension - For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
- For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision. School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 3 (all male)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 3
Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 4 (all male)
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 2 (all male)
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 2 (all male)
- Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all female)
Comments
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: