City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
17.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Hubert O. Sibley Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
Miami-Dade County: | 45 |
Miami: | 44 |
Hubert O. Sibley Elementary: | 17 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (305) 953-3737 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 5141
School type: Elementary
District Name: DADE
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 6
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 953-5447
Principal: Michael Charlot
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 17
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 108
Senate District: 33
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 64% |
State average from 68 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 63% |
State average from 68 schools: | 79% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 84% |
State average from 68 schools: | 86% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 38% |
State average from 68 schools: | 55% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 59% |
State average from 68 schools: | 64% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 55% |
State average from 68 schools: | 67% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 50% |
State average from 68 schools: | 59% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 58% |
State average from 68 schools: | 65% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 471 |
State average from 68 schools: | 549 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 68 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: C
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: D
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: N
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 95% |
State average from 68 schools: | 57% |
Minority RateHere: | 99% |
State average from 68 schools: | 46% |
Region: 5
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 414 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 415 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 87
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 387
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 382
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 61% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 388
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 383
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 351 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 351 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 93% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 75
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 62% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 328
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 323
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 61% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 328
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 323
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 396 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 397 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 86
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 61% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 369
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 364
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 62% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 370
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 365
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 109 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 109 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 90% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 93
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 61% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 93
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 64% |
State average from 68 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 63% |
State average from 68 schools: | 78% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 90% |
State average from 68 schools: | 90% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 51% |
State average from 68 schools: | 51% |
Making Reading Gains HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 72% |
State average from 68 schools: | 68% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 70% |
State average from 68 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 71% |
State average from 68 schools: | 65% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 68% |
State average from 68 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 549 |
State average from 68 schools: | 561 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 68 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: D
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: N
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 91% |
State average from 68 schools: | 54% |
Minority RateHere: | 99% |
State average from 68 schools: | 46% |
Region: 5
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 481 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 481 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 109
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 451
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 443
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 59% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 451
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 445
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 401 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 401 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 83
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 62% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 376
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 370
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 376
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 371
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 74 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 74 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 67
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 58% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 431 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 431 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 102
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 406
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 400
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 406
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 402
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 146 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 146 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 90% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 51% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 131
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 50% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 131
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 55% |
State average from 65 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 50% |
State average from 65 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 83% |
State average from 65 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 16% |
State average from 65 schools: | 47% |
Making Reading Gains HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 58% |
State average from 65 schools: | 64% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 48% |
State average from 65 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 59% |
State average from 65 schools: | 59% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 49% |
State average from 65 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 418 |
State average from 65 schools: | 536 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 65 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: NO
Grade in 2008: D
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 89% |
State average from 65 schools: | 52% |
Minority RateHere: | 99% |
State average from 65 schools: | 46% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 513 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 513 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 130
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 52% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 492
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 477
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 47% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 492
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 478
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 439 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 439 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 111
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 53% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 419
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 406
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 47% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 418
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 406
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 67
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 443 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 443 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 117
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 53% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 425
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 411
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 49% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 425
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 412
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 139 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 139 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 90% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 46% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 130
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 45% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 131
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 122
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 54% |
State average from 60 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 54% |
State average from 60 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 85% |
State average from 60 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 26% |
State average from 60 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 62% |
State average from 60 schools: | 69% |
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
Making Math GainsHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 62% |
State average from 60 schools: | 65% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 69% |
State average from 60 schools: | 66% |
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 71% |
State average from 60 schools: | 65% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere: | 483 |
State average from 60 schools: | 538 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 60 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 88% |
State average from 60 schools: | 55% |
Minority RateHere: | 99% |
State average from 60 schools: | 55% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 582 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 582 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 134
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 52% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 565
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 52% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 565
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 486 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 486 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 95% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 111
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 473
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 473
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 87 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 87 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 514 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 514 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 96% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 116
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 498
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 498
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 172 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 172 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 52% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 163
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 163
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 56% |
State average from 61 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 53% |
State average from 61 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 88% |
State average from 61 schools: | 83% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 59% |
State average from 61 schools: | 64% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 57% |
State average from 61 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 57% |
State average from 61 schools: | 64% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere: | 370 |
State average from 61 schools: | 421 |
Percent TestedHere: | 99% |
State average from 61 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: N
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 89% |
State average from 61 schools: | 55% |
Minority RateHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 99% |
State average from 61 schools: | 54% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 601 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 597 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 93% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 151
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 574
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 51% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 570
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 503 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 500 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 132
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 482
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 51% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 479
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 89 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 88 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 83
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 82
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 525 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 522 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 132
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 53% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 500
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 50% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 497
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 179 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 176 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 50
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 45% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 171
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 41% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 168
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 55% |
State average from 59 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 56% |
State average from 59 schools: | 66% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 87% |
State average from 59 schools: | 85% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 69% |
State average from 59 schools: | 66% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 69% |
State average from 59 schools: | 67% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 63% |
State average from 59 schools: | 62% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere: | 399 |
State average from 59 schools: | 418 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 59 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: N
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 92% |
State average from 59 schools: | 56% |
Minority RateHere: | 98% |
State average from 59 schools: | 54% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1270 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 295 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 24% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 14% |
State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 39% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 19% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 3% |
State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 61% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1489 |
State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 304 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 25% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 15% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 40% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 18% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 60% |
State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1496 |
State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 283 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 29% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 17% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 29% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 23% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 54% |
State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1591 |
State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 290 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 23% |
State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 21% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 36% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 16% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 56% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 294 |
State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 33% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 36% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 22% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 31% |
State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1434 |
State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 329 |
State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 10% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 37% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 31% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 11% |
State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 79% |
State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1510 |
State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 312 |
State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 14% |
State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 28% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 25% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 27% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 58% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1588 |
State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 316 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 19% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 37% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 26% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 12% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 44% |
State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1645 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 303 |
State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 35% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 15% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 25% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 18% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 6% |
State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 49% |
State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1174 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 279 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1531 |
State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 311 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 04%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1576 |
State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 297 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1623 |
State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 295 |
State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 306 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1373 |
State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 316 |
State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1559 |
State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 324 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1581 |
State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 314 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1637 |
State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 301 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 111
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Unscore - Combined: 2
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1215 |
State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 286 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1473 |
State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 301 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1437 |
State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 272 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1633 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 297 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 268 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1336 |
State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 308 |
State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1461 |
State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 301 |
State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1498 |
State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 297 |
State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1561 |
State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 284 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 137 |
State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 615 |
State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 638 |
State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 9 |
State average: | 10 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 131 |
State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale ScoreHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 647 |
State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Functional (max 18)HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 11 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 116 |
State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale ScoreHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 663 |
State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 8 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 133
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 293 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 62%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 51%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1140 |
State average: | 1342 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 274 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1463 |
State average from 1875 schools: | 1542 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 299 |
State average: | 313 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1479 |
State average: | 1546 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1285 |
State average: | 1397 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 194
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1543 |
State average from 1873 schools: | 1629 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 291 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1542 |
State average: | 1632 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1475 |
State average: | 1532 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 67
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1567 |
State average from 878 schools: | 1661 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 285 |
State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 98%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1574 |
State average: | 1663 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1462 |
State average: | 1592 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 112
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 285 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1328 |
State average: | 1413 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 306 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1499 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 1525 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 310 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1513 |
State average: | 1528 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1322 |
State average: | 1414 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 191
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1570 |
State average from 1872 schools: | 1647 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 312 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1578 |
State average: | 1649 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1442 |
State average: | 1519 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 136
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1630 |
State average from 873 schools: | 1641 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 300 |
State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 98%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1635 |
State average: | 1645 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1578 |
State average: | 1620 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 58
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 168
Mean Scale ScoreHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 614 |
State average from 1891 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR: 44
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 138
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 630 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 642 |
Median NPR: 50
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 134
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 658 |
State average from 1870 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR: 64
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 136
Mean Scale ScoreHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 662 |
State average from 874 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR: 55
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 167
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 615 |
State average from 1891 schools: | 632 |
Median NPR: 54
Number Sense (max 14): 9
Operations (max 11): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 138
Mean Scale ScoreHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 637 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 652 |
Median NPR: 65
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 134
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 646 |
State average from 1870 schools: | 663 |
Median NPR: 58
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 136
Mean Scale ScoreHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 668 |
State average from 874 schools: | 669 |
Median NPR: 63
Number Sense (max 10): 5
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 137
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 285 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 47%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 82%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 59%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Miami, FL
- Hubert O. Sibley Elementary School in Miami, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: