Imagine At N Lauderdale Middle School in North Lauderdale, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 11.

1395 S STATE RD 7
North Lauderdale, FL 33068

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Falcon Cove Middle School (15.4 miles):

91
Don Estridge High Tech Middle School (13.3 miles):

81
Somerset Academy Middle School (19.3 miles):

57
Plantation Middle School (5.5 miles):

50
John F. Kennedy Middle School (19.6 miles):

42
Village Academy Elementary School (18.5 miles):

28
Imagine At N Lauderdale Middle School:

11
Eagles Nest Middle Charter School (3.4 miles):

10
Imagine At N Lauderdale Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Broward County:

47
North Lauderdale:

22
Imagine At N Lauderdale Middle:

11

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (954) 973-8900 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 6
School number: 5261
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: BROWARD
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (954) 974-5588
Principal: Rebecca Dahl
Regular charter school.
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Year 4 in Need of Improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 23
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 94
Senate District: 32

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

40%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

42%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

79%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

16%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

42%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

49%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

78%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

416
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: D

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

94%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

97%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 179 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 179 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 168
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 158

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 168
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 158
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 129 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 129 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 111

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 111
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 169 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 169 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 158
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 148

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
IMAGINE AT N LAUDERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 158
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 148
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

43%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

40%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

24%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
IMAGINE AT N LAUDERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

58%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

73%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

67%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

456
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
IMAGINE AT N LAUDERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

87%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 163 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 153
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 147

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 153
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 146
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 113 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 113 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 103

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 141 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 141 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 129
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

56%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

37%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

83%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
IMAGINE AT N LAUDERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
IMAGINE AT N LAUDERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

68%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

61%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

445
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

97%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

82%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

96%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 150 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 149 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
IMAGINE AT N LAUDERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 135
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 135
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 100 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 100 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 91
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 91
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 124 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 123 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

52%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

30%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

21%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

61%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

70%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

446
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
Here:

97%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

75%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

93%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 197 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 198 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 175
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
IMAGINE AT N LAUDERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 176
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 132 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 132 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 148 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 149 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 134
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
IMAGINE AT N LAUDERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 135
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

51%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

34%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

85%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
IMAGINE AT N LAUDERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

68%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

57%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

81%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

376
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

65%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

90%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 178 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 178 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 43
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 169
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 169
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 114 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 114 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 107
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 107
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 31
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
IMAGINE AT N LAUDERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 31
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 116 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 116 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 27

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 113
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 113
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

39%
State average from 505 schools:

59%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

28%
State average from 505 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

50%
State average from 506 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
IMAGINE AT N LAUDERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

61%
State average from 505 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 505 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 505 schools:

66%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

307
State average from 506 schools:

397
Percent Tested
IMAGINE AT N LAUDERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

95%
State average from 506 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: P

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

74%
State average from 506 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

88%
State average from 506 schools:

50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1515
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

43%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
IMAGINE AT N LAUDERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

38%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
IMAGINE AT N LAUDERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1661
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

36%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

41%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
IMAGINE AT N LAUDERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1759
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

47%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

18%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

27%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

45%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

40%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

13%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

15%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
IMAGINE AT N LAUDERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1523
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

49%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
IMAGINE AT N LAUDERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

23%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
IMAGINE AT N LAUDERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

18%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

28%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
IMAGINE AT N LAUDERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
IMAGINE AT N LAUDERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1668
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

43%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

22%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

31%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
IMAGINE AT N LAUDERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1828
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

27%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
IMAGINE AT N LAUDERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

27%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

47%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1561
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1721
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1804
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

269
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1510
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

272
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1732
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1859
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 44
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1683
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1629
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1790
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

260
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1573
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
IMAGINE AT N LAUDERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

287
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1743
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1785
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

55
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

664
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

57
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
IMAGINE AT N LAUDERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

46
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
IMAGINE AT N LAUDERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

673
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
IMAGINE AT N LAUDERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

60
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

47
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
IMAGINE AT N LAUDERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

672
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

50
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
IMAGINE AT N LAUDERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 48
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

258
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 23%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 77%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1518
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
IMAGINE AT N LAUDERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

277
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1519
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1440
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 79

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1657
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 81%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1676
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1552
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 124

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1855
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1876
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1787
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 89

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1519
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

274
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1552
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1561
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -9

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1656
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1680
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1523
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 156

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1815
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1834
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1756
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 78

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 69
Mean Scale Score
Here:

654
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 48
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 64
Mean Scale Score
Here:

656
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 43
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 62
Mean Scale Score
Here:

682
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 59
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 69
Mean Scale Score
Here:

649
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 44
Number Sense (max 10): 4
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 64
Mean Scale Score
IMAGINE AT N LAUDERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

659
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 47
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 62
Mean Scale Score
Here:

687
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 61
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 61
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
IMAGINE AT N LAUDERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

278
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 33%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 59%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 89%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. North Lauderdale, FL
  5. Imagine At N Lauderdale Middle School in North Lauderdale, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.