Jay High School in Jay, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 65.

13863 ALABAMA ST
Jay, FL 32565

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Jay High School:

65
Blackwater Stop Camp School (17.9 miles):

40
Central High School (13.2 miles):

26
Carver - Century K-8 School (6.4 miles):

17
Jay High School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Santa Rosa County:

54
Jay:

51
Jay High School:

65

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (850) 675-4507 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 57
School number: 141
School type: Senior High
District Name: SANTA ROSA
Grade range: GRADES 7 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (850) 675-8573
Principal: Dale Westmoreland
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 1
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 1
Senate District: 2
School Web Address: http://www.santarosa.k12.fl.us/schools/jhs/

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

43%
State average from 25 schools:

62%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

85%
State average from 25 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 25 schools:

81%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

30%
State average from 24 schools:

50%
Making Reading Gains
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

44%
State average from 25 schools:

58%
Making Math Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 25 schools:

67%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

48%
State average from 25 schools:

52%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

62%
State average from 25 schools:

62%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

479
State average from 25 schools:

501
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 25 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

54%
State average from 26 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

11%
State average from 26 schools:

34%
Region: 1

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 189 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 189 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 81
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 180
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 171

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 180
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 170
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 167 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 167 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 74
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 162
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 153

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 162
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 152
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 110 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 103

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

77%
State average from 25 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 26 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

39%
State average from 25 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

53%
State average from 25 schools:

62%
Making Math Gains
Here:

76%
State average from 25 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

48%
State average from 25 schools:

63%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

65%
State average from 25 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

501
State average from 25 schools:

532
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 26 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

45%
State average from 26 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

36%
Region: 1


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 199 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 199 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 94
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 187
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 173

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 186
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 174
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 184 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 185 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 86
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 172
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 158

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 172
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 160
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 98 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 91
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 90
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

52%
State average from 22 schools:

66%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

75%
State average from 22 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

94%
State average from 22 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

43%
State average from 22 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 22 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

75%
State average from 22 schools:

74%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

69%
State average from 22 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

64%
State average from 22 schools:

70%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

543
State average from 22 schools:

544
Percent Tested
Here:

97%
State average from 22 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

42%
State average from 22 schools:

44%
Minority Rate
Here:

6%
State average from 22 schools:

33%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 188 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 187 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 77
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 177
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 170

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 178
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 171
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 174 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 174 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 73
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 166
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 159

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 167
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 160
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 91 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 90 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 82

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 82
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 12 schools:

44%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

86%
State average from 12 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

94%
State average from 12 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

38%
State average from 12 schools:

34%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

53%
State average from 12 schools:

50%
Making Math Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 12 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

51%
State average from 12 schools:

53%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

74%
State average from 12 schools:

68%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

539
State average from 12 schools:

462
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 12 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

29%
State average from 12 schools:

48%
Minority Rate
Here:

2%
State average from 12 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 334 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 334 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 150
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 318
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 318
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 322 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 322 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 146
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 306
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 306
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 111 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 111 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 102
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 102
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

65%
State average from 12 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

85%
State average from 12 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

92%
State average from 12 schools:

74%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 12 schools:

55%
Making Math Gains
Here:

82%
State average from 12 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 12 schools:

60%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

452
State average from 12 schools:

369
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 12 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

28%
State average from 12 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

3%
State average from 12 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 315 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 316 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 151
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 304
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 304
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 306 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 307 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 146

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 295
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 295
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 99 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 100 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 39

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 92
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 92
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (98%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 44

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

60%
State average from 12 schools:

43%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

84%
State average from 12 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

90%
State average from 12 schools:

76%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

50%
State average from 12 schools:

53%
Making Math Gains
Here:

81%
State average from 12 schools:

75%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

57%
State average from 12 schools:

61%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

422
State average from 12 schools:

370
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 12 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

30%
State average from 12 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

2%
State average from 12 schools:

42%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1367
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

311
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

15%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

25%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

69%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1518
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

19%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

41%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

22%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

67%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1532
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

24%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

58%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1781
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

32%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

73%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1883
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

32%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

75%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1915
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

316
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

41%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

21%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

64%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1950
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

317
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

42%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

12%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

43%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2007
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

315
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

60%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

21%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

43%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

20%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

6%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

36%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

28%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

39%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

8
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

29%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

41%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

53%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

29%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

44%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

27%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1414
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

45%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

27%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

7%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

79%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1528
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

317
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

46%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

19%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

4%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

70%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1634
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

30%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

54%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1745
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

21%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

21%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

64%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1850
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

321
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

29%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

66%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1932
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

43%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

77%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1982
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

8%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

33%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

72%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2040
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

337
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

95%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

43%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

43%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

89%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1331
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1524
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 06%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1588
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1779
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1846
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1937
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1976
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1995
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1402
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1503
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1613
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

1702
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1838
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1925
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1991
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2007
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 86%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 121
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 47%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 77%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 357
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 100
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

1293
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1485
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1467
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1734
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1818
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

1954
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1962
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1966
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

1349
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1458
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

1590
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1707
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1834
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1952
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1947
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

1991
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 84%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

134
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

624
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

54
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

106
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

641
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

60
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

9
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

117
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

653
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

60
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

319
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

677
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

69
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

378
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

688
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

73
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

328
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

705
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

79
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

107
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

691
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

59
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

11
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

82
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

699
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

57
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

13
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 105
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

269
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 46%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 51%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 330
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

297
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 47%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 84
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

303
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 57%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1843
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1860
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

1836
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 25

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1950
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

323
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 8
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1965
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1934
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 31

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

2009
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2023
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1953
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 71

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1965
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 12
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1974
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

2011
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -37

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 8

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1869
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1879
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1791
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 88

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1962
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1971
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1908
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 63

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

2036
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2039
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1976
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 63

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

2017
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2022
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

2010
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 13

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 92
Mean Scale Score
Here:

689
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 74
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 74
Mean Scale Score
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

707
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 79
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 85
Mean Scale Score
Here:

719
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 82
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 14): 11
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 81
Mean Scale Score
Here:

703
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 61
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 92
Mean Scale Score
Here:

707
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 83
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 74
Mean Scale Score
Here:

727
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 87
Number Sense (max 9): 7
Operations (max 9): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 85
Mean Scale Score
Here:

741
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 88
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 11
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 8
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 10

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 81
Mean Scale Score
Here:

720
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 72
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 8
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 75
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

313
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 52%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 12
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 93%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 79
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

306
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 61%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
JAY HIGH SCHOOL:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 87%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Jay, FL
  5. Jay High School in Jay, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.