Karen M. Siegel Academy School in Lake Alfred, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 68.

935 N BUENA VISTA DR
Lake Alfred, FL 33850

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
International Baccalaureate School (16.8 miles):

100
Karen M. Siegel Academy School:

68
Valleyview Elementary School (7.6 miles):

62
Wendell Watson Elementary School (11.8 miles):

50
Lake Shipp Elementary School (7.6 miles):

43
Daniel Jenkins Academy Of Technology High School (6.4 miles):

35
Floral Avenue Elementary School (17.1 miles):

26
Kathleen Middle School (17.6 miles):

17
Karen M. Siegel Academy School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Polk County:

41
Lake Alfred:

33
Karen M. Siegel Academy School:

68

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (863) 965-5566 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 53
School number: 661
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: POLK
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (863) 968-5151
Principal: Donna Swindle
The main educational program offered at the school: Special Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 12
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 65
Senate District: 15

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

89%
State average from 59 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Math
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

90%
State average from 59 schools:

78%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

88%
State average from 59 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

73%
State average from 59 schools:

54%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 59 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 59 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

52%
State average from 59 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

61%
State average from 59 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

584
State average from 59 schools:

560
Percent Tested
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

100%
State average from 59 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 119999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

38%
State average from 59 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

39%
State average from 59 schools:

46%
Region: 2

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 377 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 377 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 103
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 362
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 355

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 362
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 355
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 225 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 225 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 56
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 219
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 213

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 219
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 213
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 96 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 144 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 144 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

91%
State average from 58 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

89%
State average from 58 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

82%
State average from 58 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

68%
State average from 58 schools:

50%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

76%
State average from 58 schools:

69%
Making Math Gains
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

75%
State average from 58 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 58 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

62%
State average from 58 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

611
State average from 58 schools:

564
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 59 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

37%
State average from 59 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

36%
State average from 59 schools:

46%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 377 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 377 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 135
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 366
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 363

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 366
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 363
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 237 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 237 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 90
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 233
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 231

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 233
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 231
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 91 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 91 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 142 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 142 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 135
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 135

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 135
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 135
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

88%
State average from 59 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

86%
State average from 59 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

79%
State average from 59 schools:

83%
Meeting High Standards in Science
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

67%
State average from 59 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 59 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 59 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

61%
State average from 59 schools:

60%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 59 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

586
State average from 59 schools:

541
Percent Tested
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

100%
State average from 59 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

32%
State average from 59 schools:

47%
Minority Rate
Here:

35%
State average from 59 schools:

46%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 435 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 435 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 129
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 431
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 409

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 431
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 409
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 290 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 290 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 86
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 288
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 278

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 288
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 279
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 84 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 75

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 74
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 123 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 123 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 112

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 112
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 19
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 57
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 57
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (98%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 45
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 45
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (98%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 57
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 57
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1551
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

33%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

19%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

84%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

19
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1744
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

347
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

38%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

18%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

84%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

21
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

1734
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

20%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

41%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

15%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

76%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

11
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1636
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

23%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

21%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

5%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

55%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1789
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

22%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

65%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1832
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

24%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

43%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1856
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

300
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

32%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

34%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

22%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

34%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

10
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1878
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

47%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

44%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

14%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

6%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

28%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

17%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

64%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

9
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

38%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

31%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

300
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

29%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

39%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

5%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

32%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1609
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

367
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

6%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

7%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

19%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

38%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

31%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

87%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1727
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

362
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

3%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

5%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

40%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

23%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

92%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1741
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

348
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

35%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

14%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

75%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1602
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

34%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

24%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

3%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

43%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1741
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

28%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

12%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

48%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1866
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

19%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

42%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

63%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1901
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

22%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

53%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1964
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

75%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

17%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

22%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

27%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

4%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

61%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1542
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1771
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

352
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 06%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 06%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1734
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1630
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1751
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

306
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1869
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

306
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1884
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1854
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

291
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1632
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

372
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1728
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

362
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1737
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

348
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1630
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1767
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1878
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1914
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1944
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 136
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 294
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 912
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 70%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1567
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

344
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1668
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 20
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1735
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

1630
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1771
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1830
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1851
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1832
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

1580
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

361
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1661
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

347
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1730
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1576
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

287
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1803
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1871
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1898
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1933
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

147
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

647
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

73
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

130
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

664
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

78
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

157
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

680
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

81
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

291
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

662
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

55
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

277
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

678
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

64
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

288
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

680
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

58
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

1
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

694
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

62
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

12
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

5
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

893
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

703
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

61
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 129
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

317
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 69%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 74%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 271
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

286
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 41%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
KAREN M. SIEGEL ACADEMY:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 925
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

280
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 41%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 74%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Lake Alfred, FL
  5. Karen M. Siegel Academy School in Lake Alfred, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.