Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Lasara Elementary School in Lasara, TX
(PK-08 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 28
Address
 607 E SIXTH ST
Lasara, TX 78561
Telephone
(956) 642-3271
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.lasaraisd.net
City-data.com school rating
28
Students
352
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
23.7
Free lunch eligible students
282
School district
LASARA ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
HARGILL EL (6.8 miles):

77
MONTE ALTO EL (7.7 miles):

71
LYFORD MIDDLE (7.6 miles):

52
LASARA H S (0.0 miles):

38
JOSE BORREGO MIDDLE (7.7 miles):

34
SMITH EL (7.4 miles):

34
Lasara Elementary School:

28
LYFORD H S (7.7 miles):

26
MONTE ALTO H S (7.6 miles):

21
Lasara Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Willacy County:

39
Lasara:

33
Lasara Elementary School:

28

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 352
Enrollment in 2015: 367
Enrollment in 2014: 370
Enrollment in 2013: 384
Enrollment in 2012: 362
Enrollment in 2011: 356
Enrollment in 2010: 383
Enrollment in 2009: 377
Enrollment in 2008: 358
Enrollment in 2007: 323
Enrollment in 2006: 315
Enrollment in 2005: 323
Enrollment in 2004: 322
Enrollment in 2003: 307
Enrollment in 2002: 297
Enrollment in 2001: 310
Enrollment in 2000: 287
Enrollment in 1999: 305

Lasara Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05G06G07G08Total
All students27353735334026354143352
Female students17152215172713211323183
Male students10201520161313142820169
American Indian/Alaska Native students - - - - 1 - - 1 - - 2
Asian students - - 1 - - - 1 - - - 2
Hispanic students27353535324025344141345
White students - - 1 - - - - - - 23

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 27
Kindergarten enrollment: 35
1st grade enrollment: 37
2nd grade enrollment: 35
3rd grade enrollment: 33
4th grade enrollment: 40
5th grade enrollment: 26
6th grade enrollment: 35
7th grade enrollment: 41
8th grade enrollment: 43

Lasara Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 183 (52.0%)
Here:

52.0%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 169 (48.0%)
Lasara Elementary School:

48.0%
State:

50.1%

Lasara Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 2 (0.6%)
Here:

0.6%
State:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 2 (0.6%)
Lasara Elementary School:

0.6%
Texas:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 345 (98.0%)
School:

98.0%
Texas:

46.9%
White enrollment: 3 (0.9%)
Here:

0.9%
Texas:

32.3%

Lasara Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 282 (80.1%)
School:

80.1%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 282 (80.1%)
Here:

80.1%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 0 (0.0%)
School:

0.0%
State:

6.2%

Lasara Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 23.7

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 0.1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 0.1

Student/Teacher Ratio
School:

14.9
Texas:

15.6

Lasara Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $1,676,351
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 21 (Salary Expenditures: $1,119,767)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 0.2 (Salary Expenditures: $42,428)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 0.1 (Salary Expenditures: $175,582)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 0.3 (Salary Expenditures: $123,317)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $90,628
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $508,019
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $1,119,767
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 0.2 (Salary Expenditures: $42,428)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 0.2 (Salary Expenditures: $342,274)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 0.3 (Salary Expenditures: $123,317)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $293,525

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 55 (male: 26, female: 29)
  • Hispanic: 55 (male: 26, female: 29)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 20 (male: 13, female: 7)
  • Hispanic: 20 (male: 13, female: 7)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (all male)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 13 (male: 5, female: 8)
  • Hispanic: 13 (male: 5, female: 8)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 13 (male: 5, female: 8)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,162 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2

Percent of 1st grade students retained
Lasara Elementary School:

5.4%
Texas:

6.1%
Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 5 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 5
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
Here:

14.3%
State:

4.8%
Total number of students retained in 3rd grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Percent of 3rd grade students retained
School:

12.1%
State:

4.1%

Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 2, female: 5)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
School:

19.9
Texas:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,492
  • Males1,542
  • Females1,462
  • Hispanic1,492
Math Average Scale Score:

1,492
Texas:

1,453
Math students tested: 35
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 35

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.1 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.7 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.3 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3 (74%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 31%

20%
26%
23%
31%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,542, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 38%)
8%
23%
31%
38%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,462, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 27%)
27%
28%
18%
27%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,492, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 31%)
20%
26%
23%
31%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,496
  • Males1,521
  • Females1,481
  • Hispanic1,496
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,496
Texas:

1,423
Reading students tested: 35
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 35

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.3 (85%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.4 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10 (72%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 43%

11%
26%
20%
43%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,521, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 54%)
8%
15%
23%
54%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,481, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 36%)
14%
31%
19%
36%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,496, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 43%)
11%
26%
20%
43%
4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,539
  • Males1,547
  • Females1,532
  • Hispanic1,542
Math Average Scale Score:

1,539
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 35
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 35

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.6 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.8 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.5 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.8 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 34%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 14%

34%
29%
23%
14%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,547, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 19%)
31%
31%
19%
19%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,532, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 11%)
37%
26%
26%
11%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,542, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 15%)
32%
30%
23%
15%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,530
  • Males1,534
  • Females1,526
  • Hispanic1,532
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,530
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 35
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 35

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.8 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.3 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 37%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 20%

20%
37%
23%
20%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,534, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 25%)
31%
25%
19%
25%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,526, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 16%)
11%
47%
26%
16%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,532, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 21%)
21%
35%
23%
21%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,588
  • Males3,573
  • Females3,600
  • Hispanic3,597
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,588
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 35
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 35

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.9 (49%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 3.4 (43%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.4 (65%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 51%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

51%
26%
23%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,573, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 0%)
44%
31%
25%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,600, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 58%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 0%)
58%
21%
21%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,597, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 0%)
50%
26%
24%
5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,609
  • Males1,593
  • Females1,636
  • Hispanic1,609
Math Average Scale Score:

1,609
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 31
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 31

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.8 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.2 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.8 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.5 (62%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 33%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 19%

23%
25%
33%
19%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,593, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 15%)
25%
30%
30%
15%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,636, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 27%)
18%
18%
37%
27%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,609, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 19%)
23%
25%
33%
19%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,530
  • Males1,511
  • Females1,566
  • Hispanic1,530
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,530
State:

1,546
Reading students tested: 31
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 31

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.6 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.5 (60%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 13%

35%
26%
26%
13%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,511, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 0%)
40%
20%
40%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,566, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 36%)
27%
37%
36%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,530, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 13%)
35%
26%
26%
13%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,614
  • Males3,627
  • Females3,590
  • Hispanic3,614
Science Average Scale Score:

3,614
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 31
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 31

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.5 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.2 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 7.3 (61%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 61%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 10%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 3%

26%
61%
10%
3%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,627, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 70%, Meets: 5%, Masters: 5%)
20%
70%
5%
5%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,590, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 0%)
36%
46%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,614, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 61%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 3%)
26%
61%
10%
3%
5th Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 1

Reading students tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 1

Science students tested: 1
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 1

6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,562
  • Males1,517
  • Females1,576
  • Hispanic1,562
Math Average Scale Score:

1,562
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 33
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 33

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.7 (47%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.4 (42%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 2.5 (41%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.5 (35%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 46%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 18%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

36%
46%
18%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,517, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 63%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 0%)
63%
25%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,576, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 52%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
28%
52%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,562, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 0%)
36%
46%
18%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,560
  • Males1,490
  • Females1,583
  • Hispanic1,560
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,560
Texas:

1,457
Reading students tested: 33
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 33

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.9 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.8 (59%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 55%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 15%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 6%

24%
55%
15%
6%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,490, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 63%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
38%
63%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,583, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 52%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 8%)
20%
52%
20%
8%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,560, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 55%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 6%)
24%
55%
15%
6%
7th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,578
  • Males1,566
  • Females1,594
  • Hispanic1,578
Math Average Scale Score:

1,578
Texas:

1,571
Math students tested: 25
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 25

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 2.7 (45%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.3 (42%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5 (42%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.2 (31%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 56%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 24%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 16%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 4%

56%
24%
16%
4%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,566, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 57%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 0%)
57%
36%
7%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,594, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 55%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 9%)
55%
9%
27%
9%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,578, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 56%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 4%)
56%
24%
16%
4%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,628
  • Males1,581
  • Females1,688
  • Hispanic1,628
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,628
Texas:

1,550
Reading students tested: 25
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 25

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.2 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.6 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.7 (61%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 36%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

24%
36%
24%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,581, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 7%)
36%
35%
22%
7%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,688, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 27%)
9%
36%
28%
27%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,628, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 16%)
24%
36%
24%
16%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All3,748
  • Males3,550
  • Females4,000
  • Hispanic3,748
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,748
Texas:

3,515
Writing students tested: 25
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 25

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.6 (48%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.2 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.2 (72%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 44%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 16%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 12%

28%
44%
16%
12%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,550, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 0%)
36%
50%
14%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,000, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 27%)
18%
37%
18%
27%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,748, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 12%)
28%
44%
16%
12%
8th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,560
  • Males1,556
  • Females1,564
  • Hispanic1,560
Math Average Scale Score:

1,560
Texas:

1,539
Math students tested: 14
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 30

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 2.2 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.3 (39%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.7 (31%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.7 (39%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 64%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 7%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

64%
29%
7%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,556, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 57%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
57%
43%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,564, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 71%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 0%)
71%
15%
14%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,560, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 64%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 0%)
64%
29%
7%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,668
  • Males1,688
  • Females1,653
  • Hispanic1,671
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,668
State:

1,561
Reading students tested: 30
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 30

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.5 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.4 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.2 (60%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 33%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 17%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 20%

30%
33%
17%
20%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,688, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 23%)
23%
46%
8%
23%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,653, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 18%)
35%
24%
23%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,671, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 21%)
28%
34%
17%
21%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,938
  • Males3,907
  • Females3,962
  • Hispanic3,942
Science Average Scale Score:

3,938
Texas:

3,634
Science students tested: 30
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 30

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.2 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.7 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 7.7 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 36%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 14%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 23%

27%
36%
14%
23%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,907, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 23%)
23%
46%
8%
23%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,962, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 24%)
29%
30%
17%
24%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,942, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 24%)
28%
34%
14%
24%

    Social Studies Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,911
  • Males4,093
  • Females3,771
  • Hispanic3,924
Social Studies Average Scale Score:

3,911
Texas:

3,461
Social Studies students tested: 30
Social Studies # Answer Documents Submitted: 30

Social Studies Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 12.7 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.6 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.2 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.8 (54%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 43%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 17%

20%
43%
20%
17%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,093, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 62%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 23%)
62%
15%
23%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,771, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 12%)
35%
30%
23%
12%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,924, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 17%)
17%
45%
21%
17%

Health & Safety


Harassment & Bullying:
Show data for

(State average from 919 schools)
An allegation is a claim or assertion that someone has done something wrong or illegal, typically made without proof.

Harassment or bullying on the basis of disability refers to intimidation or abusive behavior toward a student based on actual or perceived disability. Harassing conduct may take many forms, including verbal acts and name-calling, as well as non-verbal behavior, such as graphic and written statements, or conduct that is physically threatening, harmful or humiliating. The conduct can be carried out by school employees, other students, and non-employee third parties. Bullying on the basis of disability constitutes disability harassment.
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of disability: 1
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of disability per 1,000 students
School:

2.8
Texas:

0.4
Students reported as harassed or bullied on the basis of disability: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Section 504: 2
Students disciplined for bullying or harassment on the basis of disability: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic28
  • LEP2
  • IDEA2
  • 5044
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 28 (male: 11, female: 17)
  • Hispanic: 28 (male: 11, female: 17)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all female)
  • Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Lasara Elementary School:

79.5
State:

147.9

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)
Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
Instances of out-of-school suspension (All preschool students): 1

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (All preschool students)
Here:

2.8
Texas:

1.4
Preschool children receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Expulsions:
Show data for

(State average from 1,623 schools)
Preschool expulsion refers to the permanent termination of a preschool child's participation in a preschool program at a school or facility for disciplinary purposes. A preschool child who is transitioned directly from the classroom to a different setting deemed to be more appropriate for the child (e.g., special education, transitional classroom, or therapeutic preschool program) is not considered an expelled preschooler.

Expulsion with educational services refers to an action taken by the local educational agency of removing a child from his/her regular school for disciplinary purposes, and providing educational services to the child (e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring; transfer to an alternative school) for the remainder of the school year (or longer) in accordance with local educational agency policy. Expulsion with educational services also includes removals resulting from violations of the Gun Free Schools Act that are modified to less than 365 days.
Total Number of Preschool Children who Received Expulsions: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Preschool Children who Received Expulsions per 1,000 students)
Lasara Elementary School:

5.7
Texas:

2.9
Students without Disabilities who received an expulsion with educational services: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Students without Disabilities who received an expulsion with educational services per 1,000 students
Here:

5.7
State:

32.9

Classes & Courses


Algebra I:
Show data for

(State average from 1,291 schools)
Algebra I is a (college-preparatory) course that includes the study of properties and operations of the real number system; evaluating rational algebraic expressions; solving and graphing first degree equations and inequalities; translating word problems into equations; operations with and factoring of polynomials; and solving simple quadratic equations. Algebra I is a foundation course leading to higher-level mathematics courses, including Geometry and Algebra II.
8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I: 19 (male: 8, female: 11)
  • Hispanic: 19 (male: 8, female: 11)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
8th grade studenst who passed Algebra I: 20 (male: 10, female: 10)
  • Hispanic: 20 (male: 10, female: 10)
Percent of 8th grade students who passed
Lasara Elementary School:

100.0%
State:

87.0%

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Lasara, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Lasara main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Lasara Elementary School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents