All Cities Nevada Forum Nevada Panaca, NV Meadow Valley Middle School in Panaca, Nevada (NV)
Meadow Valley Middle School in Panaca, Nevada (NV)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Nevada) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
48 .
Address:
Principal: Marty Soderborg
Phone Number (Verify before using): (775) 728-4655
Fax Number (Verify before using): (775) 728-4302
Website: meadowvalley.lcm.schoolinsites.com
Title I School: No
AYP School Designation: Adequate
Other nearby schools ratings: Meadow Valley Middle School rating compared to average state and city schools ratings: Nevada:
43Panaca:
52Meadow Valley Middle School:
48
Adequate Yearly Progress English Language Arts School English Language Arts AYP Designation: Adequate
Participation Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
100.0%All Students:
99.4%White:
99.3%
Percent Proficient White:
67.6%All Students:
67.1%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
55.6%
Math School Math AYP Designation: Adequate
Participation All Students:
100.0%White:
100.0%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
100.0%
Percent Proficient White:
55.8%All Students:
55.4%
Average Daily Attendance School Average Daily Attendance AYP Designation: Adequate
Black:
99.0%Individual Education Plan Students:
96.0%American Indian:
95.3%Hispanic:
95.0%All Students:
94.5%White:
94.3%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
93.5%
Discuss this school with others on our active
Nevada Forum
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Language Grade 7 Detailed Students Results Percent of Meadow Valley Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 50 12.0% 33.9% 22.0% 26.4% 32.0% 22.4% 34.0% 17.3% Male 27 18.5% 41.2% 18.5% 25.8% 29.6% 19.5% 33.3% 13.5% Female 23 4.3% 26.5% 26.1% 26.9% 34.8% 25.4% 34.8% 21.1% White 46 13.0% 22.4% 21.7% 25.8% 32.6% 27.5% 32.6% 24.3% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 13 30.8% 48.0% 15.4% 27.5% 38.5% 16.8% 15.4% 7.7% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 33 15.2% 34.5% 51.5% 26.3% 18.2% 21.4% 15.2% 17.8% Male 10 30.0% 41.5% 50.0% 26.0% 20.0% 18.2% 0.0% 14.3% Female 23 8.7% 27.3% 52.2% 26.6% 17.4% 24.8% 21.7% 21.4% White 28 10.7% 22.6% 53.6% 25.7% 21.4% 26.0% 14.3% 25.6% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 18 11.1% 48.9% 55.6% 27.3% 16.7% 15.8% 16.7% 8.0% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 38 31.6% 34.6% 23.7% 25.5% 31.6% 21.7% 13.2% 18.3% Male 15 40.0% 42.2% 26.7% 24.9% 26.7% 18.7% 6.7% 14.2% Female 23 26.1% 26.7% 21.7% 26.0% 34.8% 24.8% 17.4% 22.4% White 37 32.4% 23.1% 21.6% 24.7% 32.4% 26.4% 13.5% 25.7% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 11 27.3% 49.0% 27.3% 26.5% 36.4% 16.2% 9.1% 8.3% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 49 22.4% 33.6% 32.7% 26.0% 26.5% 22.5% 18.4% 17.9% Male 27 25.9% 40.9% 40.7% 25.9% 22.2% 19.4% 11.1% 13.7% Female 22 18.2% 26.0% 22.7% 26.0% 31.8% 25.8% 27.3% 22.2% White 45 24.4% 23.2% 28.9% 25.2% 26.7% 26.9% 20.0% 24.7% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 24 25.0% 48.8% 33.3% 26.8% 33.3% 16.5% 8.3% 7.9% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 38 31.6% 35.5% 42.1% 25.0% 13.2% 22.0% 13.2% 17.5% Male 23 47.8% 42.1% 34.8% 25.2% 8.7% 19.1% 8.7% 13.5% Female 15 6.7% 28.4% 53.3% 24.7% 20.0% 25.1% 20.0% 21.8% White 33 36.4% 26.1% 39.4% 24.0% 15.2% 26.0% 9.1% 23.9% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 20 55.0% 49.3% 25.0% 26.8% 5.0% 15.9% 15.0% 8.1% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Mathematics Grade 7 Detailed Students Results Percent of Meadow Valley Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 50 12.0% 31.2% 34.0% 27.2% 20.0% 21.7% 34.0% 19.9% Male 27 11.1% 33.7% 33.3% 25.9% 14.8% 20.3% 40.7% 20.2% Female 23 13.0% 28.7% 34.8% 28.6% 26.1% 23.1% 26.1% 19.6% White 46 13.0% 20.7% 37.0% 25.1% 17.4% 25.9% 32.6% 28.2% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 13 30.8% 43.3% 38.5% 29.6% 23.1% 17.2% 7.7% 9.9% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 33 21.2% 31.1% 48.5% 26.8% 24.2% 21.7% 6.1% 20.3% Male 10 40.0% 33.8% 30.0% 25.6% 20.0% 19.9% 10.0% 20.8% Female 23 13.0% 28.3% 56.5% 28.1% 26.1% 23.7% 4.3% 19.9% White 28 14.3% 20.2% 53.6% 24.9% 25.0% 25.3% 7.1% 29.6% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 18 11.1% 43.3% 44.4% 29.3% 38.9% 17.7% 5.6% 9.8% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 38 15.8% 32.0% 18.4% 26.1% 34.2% 21.1% 31.6% 20.7% Male 15 20.0% 35.1% 13.3% 24.6% 40.0% 19.2% 26.7% 21.1% Female 23 13.0% 28.7% 21.7% 27.7% 30.4% 23.1% 34.8% 20.4% White 37 16.2% 21.1% 16.2% 24.0% 35.1% 25.3% 32.4% 29.5% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 11 18.2% 44.8% 9.1% 28.6% 36.4% 16.4% 36.4% 10.2% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 49 14.3% 31.5% 28.6% 27.0% 24.5% 21.5% 32.7% 20.0% Male 27 22.2% 34.6% 33.3% 25.2% 11.1% 20.3% 33.3% 19.9% Female 22 4.5% 28.2% 22.7% 29.0% 40.9% 22.7% 31.8% 20.2% White 45 15.6% 21.1% 26.7% 25.5% 24.4% 25.4% 33.3% 28.1% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 24 12.5% 45.1% 37.5% 29.0% 29.2% 16.8% 20.8% 9.1% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 38 18.4% 34.3% 31.6% 25.4% 23.7% 21.3% 26.3% 19.0% Male 23 26.1% 36.7% 39.1% 24.4% 17.4% 19.8% 17.4% 19.1% Female 15 6.7% 31.6% 20.0% 26.6% 33.3% 22.8% 40.0% 19.0% White 33 21.2% 24.8% 30.3% 23.9% 21.2% 25.0% 27.3% 26.3% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 20 30.0% 47.5% 35.0% 27.1% 15.0% 16.5% 20.0% 8.9% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Reading Grade 7 Detailed Students Results Percent of Meadow Valley Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 50 24.0% 33.9% 30.0% 27.7% 24.0% 21.6% 22.0% 16.9% Male 27 25.9% 36.9% 25.9% 26.4% 22.2% 19.9% 25.9% 16.9% Female 23 21.7% 30.8% 34.8% 29.0% 26.1% 23.3% 17.4% 16.9% White 46 23.9% 19.5% 30.4% 26.4% 26.1% 27.4% 19.6% 26.7% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 13 38.5% 49.0% 30.8% 28.3% 30.8% 15.7% 0.0% 7.0% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 33 3.0% 33.6% 45.5% 27.0% 24.2% 22.0% 27.3% 17.4% Male 10 10.0% 37.0% 50.0% 25.3% 30.0% 20.4% 10.0% 17.3% Female 23 0.0% 30.0% 43.5% 28.8% 21.7% 23.7% 34.8% 17.4% White 28 3.6% 19.5% 39.3% 25.5% 28.6% 27.4% 28.6% 27.6% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 18 0.0% 49.2% 38.9% 27.8% 27.8% 15.9% 33.3% 7.1% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 38 13.2% 34.1% 34.2% 26.6% 31.6% 21.8% 21.1% 17.6% Male 15 13.3% 37.6% 46.7% 24.6% 13.3% 20.6% 26.7% 17.2% Female 23 13.0% 30.4% 26.1% 28.7% 43.5% 23.0% 17.4% 17.9% White 37 10.8% 19.5% 35.1% 26.2% 32.4% 27.2% 21.6% 27.2% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 11 9.1% 49.9% 36.4% 26.9% 45.5% 15.7% 9.1% 7.4% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 49 10.2% 33.3% 36.7% 26.8% 22.4% 22.4% 30.6% 17.5% Male 27 11.1% 36.4% 33.3% 25.4% 29.6% 20.8% 25.9% 17.4% Female 22 9.1% 30.1% 40.9% 28.2% 13.6% 24.2% 36.4% 17.6% White 45 11.1% 19.8% 33.3% 26.0% 22.2% 27.7% 33.3% 26.5% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 24 12.5% 49.6% 29.2% 27.5% 33.3% 15.7% 25.0% 7.2% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 38 21.1% 35.1% 36.8% 26.2% 21.1% 20.4% 21.1% 18.4% Male 23 26.1% 38.1% 39.1% 25.3% 21.7% 18.9% 13.0% 17.8% Female 15 13.3% 31.8% 33.3% 27.1% 20.0% 22.0% 33.3% 19.0% White 33 24.2% 22.5% 36.4% 25.0% 18.2% 25.5% 21.2% 26.9% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 20 35.0% 50.6% 40.0% 26.8% 10.0% 14.5% 15.0% 8.2% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Science Grade 7 Detailed Students Results Percent of Meadow Valley Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 50 14.0% 29.2% 28.0% 28.5% 34.0% 22.2% 24.0% 20.1% Male 27 14.8% 32.0% 40.7% 27.9% 18.5% 20.3% 25.9% 19.8% Female 23 13.0% 26.3% 13.0% 29.1% 52.2% 24.2% 21.7% 20.4% White 46 15.2% 17.2% 28.3% 24.9% 34.8% 26.9% 21.7% 31.0% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 13 15.4% 41.3% 23.1% 31.6% 53.8% 17.5% 7.7% 9.6% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 33 24.2% 29.3% 39.4% 28.1% 18.2% 22.6% 18.2% 20.0% Male 10 50.0% 31.7% 30.0% 27.6% 10.0% 20.8% 10.0% 19.9% Female 23 13.0% 26.8% 43.5% 28.7% 21.7% 24.5% 21.7% 20.0% White 28 25.0% 16.9% 35.7% 24.5% 17.9% 27.6% 21.4% 31.1% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 18 27.8% 41.7% 27.8% 31.7% 22.2% 17.7% 22.2% 8.8% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 38 23.7% 29.6% 21.1% 27.9% 39.5% 22.2% 15.8% 20.2% Male 15 33.3% 32.7% 13.3% 27.1% 40.0% 20.0% 13.3% 20.2% Female 23 17.4% 26.4% 26.1% 28.8% 39.1% 24.4% 17.4% 20.3% White 37 21.6% 17.2% 21.6% 24.7% 40.5% 27.5% 16.2% 30.7% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 11 9.1% 42.7% 27.3% 30.6% 54.5% 17.0% 9.1% 9.7% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 49 10.2% 28.8% 38.8% 28.8% 22.4% 22.9% 28.6% 19.5% Male 27 14.8% 31.5% 44.4% 28.3% 18.5% 20.8% 22.2% 19.4% Female 22 4.5% 25.8% 31.8% 29.4% 27.3% 25.2% 36.4% 19.6% White 45 8.9% 17.5% 37.8% 25.4% 22.2% 27.9% 31.1% 29.2% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 24 12.5% 41.8% 33.3% 32.1% 29.2% 17.3% 25.0% 8.8% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 38 31.6% 32.4% 23.7% 22.3% 21.1% 24.7% 23.7% 20.6% Male 23 43.5% 35.0% 26.1% 22.2% 13.0% 22.8% 17.4% 20.1% Female 15 13.3% 29.7% 20.0% 22.5% 33.3% 26.7% 33.3% 21.1% White 33 36.4% 21.2% 21.2% 20.0% 21.2% 28.4% 21.2% 30.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 20 50.0% 45.7% 20.0% 25.4% 10.0% 19.2% 20.0% 9.7% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Nevada Writing Examination Grade 8
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Meadow Valley Middle School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Detailed Students Results Percent of Meadow Valley Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 38 6.5% -3.0% 5.4% 2.7% 24.3% 36.5% 70.3% 59.1% 0.0% 1.7% Male 21 -8.8% -12.8% 10.0% 4.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 50.2% 0.0% 0.8% Female 17 24.4% 7.1% 0.0% 1.4% 11.8% 27.8% 88.2% 68.3% 0.0% 2.6% White 35 6.8% 7.3% 5.9% 1.6% 23.5% 27.3% 70.6% 68.6% 0.0% 2.5% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 18 -2.7% -15.2% 5.6% 4.2% 33.3% 47.3% 61.1% 48.0% 0.0% 0.6% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 43 1.3% -6.9% 7.0% 5.1% 27.9% 38.0% 46.5% 48.1% 18.6% 8.8% Male 15 -30.5% -15.7% 20.0% 7.5% 46.7% 44.4% 13.3% 42.3% 20.0% 5.8% Female 28 18.3% 2.3% 0.0% 2.6% 17.9% 31.3% 64.3% 54.1% 17.9% 12.0% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 22 -4.7% -18.2% 9.1% 7.5% 31.8% 46.9% 40.9% 41.3% 18.2% 4.3% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 53 13.7% -1.3% 3.8% 5.7% 24.5% 37.7% 58.5% 47.3% 13.2% 9.4% Male 28 6.3% -9.6% 7.1% 8.0% 28.6% 43.7% 50.0% 42.1% 14.3% 6.2% Female 25 22.0% 7.1% 0.0% 3.3% 20.0% 31.6% 68.0% 52.6% 12.0% 12.6% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 18 8.7% -14.0% 5.6% 8.9% 27.8% 47.1% 55.6% 39.8% 11.1% 4.2% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 39 13.8% -2.1% 2.6% 6.2% 25.6% 37.8% 66.7% 46.1% 5.1% 9.8% Male 15 -4.7% -10.7% 6.7% 8.8% 40.0% 44.0% 53.3% 40.8% 0.0% 6.5% Female 24 25.3% 7.3% 0.0% 3.5% 16.7% 31.2% 75.0% 52.0% 8.3% 13.3% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 17 12.6% -15.3% 0.0% 9.6% 29.4% 47.7% 70.6% 38.3% 0.0% 4.4% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 45 20.4% 19.1% 2.2% 6.8% 37.8% 34.5% 46.7% 46.6% 13.3% 12.1% Male 18 -0.7% 11.1% 5.6% 9.2% 55.6% 40.1% 33.3% 42.2% 5.6% 8.6% Female 27 34.5% 27.6% 0.0% 4.2% 25.9% 28.7% 55.6% 51.3% 18.5% 15.9% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 20 15.4% 5.3% 0.0% 10.7% 45.0% 44.4% 35.0% 39.4% 20.0% 5.5% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 55 3.4% 15.7% 5.5% 5.7% 43.6% 31.1% 47.3% 47.9% 3.6% 15.3% Male 29 -13.0% 8.0% 10.3% 7.9% 55.2% 36.6% 27.6% 44.6% 6.9% 10.9% Female 26 21.7% 23.8% 0.0% 3.4% 30.8% 25.3% 69.2% 51.4% 0.0% 19.9% White 51 5.4% 26.3% 5.9% 2.6% 41.2% 23.7% 49.0% 52.7% 3.9% 21.1% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 27 -3.1% 2.1% 3.7% 9.6% 51.9% 40.9% 40.7% 42.0% 3.7% 7.6% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 39 19.2% 18.3% 5.1% 6.1% 28.2% 28.1% 43.6% 48.0% 23.1% 17.7% Male 23 4.7% 10.3% 4.3% 7.9% 43.5% 34.3% 39.1% 45.3% 13.0% 12.5% Female 16 40.0% 26.9% 6.3% 4.2% 6.3% 21.5% 50.0% 50.9% 37.5% 23.5% White 34 14.3% 29.2% 5.9% 2.9% 32.4% 20.4% 38.2% 52.5% 23.5% 24.1% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 16 15.0% 5.6% 6.3% 9.4% 31.3% 37.6% 43.8% 44.2% 18.8% 8.8% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 54 30.9% 27.7% 3.8% 9.8% 28.3% 25.5% 58.5% 45.9% 9.4% 18.9% Male 29 23.7% 20.1% 3.6% 12.5% 35.7% 30.5% 53.6% 43.3% 7.1% 13.8% Female 25 39.0% 36.0% 4.0% 7.0% 20.0% 20.1% 64.0% 48.7% 12.0% 24.3% White 45 31.2% 37.6% 4.5% 6.6% 27.3% 18.8% 56.8% 49.5% 11.4% 25.1% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 28 14.9% 13.9% 3.7% 13.9% 44.4% 35.2% 48.1% 41.9% 3.7% 9.0% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 7
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Approaches Standard This School:
15.0%Nevada:
18.2%
Exceeds Standard This School:
10.0%State:
7.7%
Meadow Valley Middle School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective All Students This School:
19.1%Nevada:
4.5%
White This School:
18.3%State:
15.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
Detailed Students Results Percent of Meadow Valley Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 40 19.1% 4.5% 0.0% 11.4% 15.0% 18.2% 75.0% 62.7% 10.0% 7.7% Male 19 18.3% 3.1% 0.0% 12.5% 15.8% 18.6% 73.7% 61.0% 10.5% 8.0% Female 21 19.8% 6.1% 0.0% 10.2% 14.3% 17.8% 76.2% 64.5% 9.5% 7.5% White 38 18.3% 15.0% 0.0% 6.3% 15.8% 12.9% 73.7% 69.2% 10.5% 11.7% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 17 22.3% -4.8% 0.0% 15.9% 11.8% 23.0% 88.2% 57.6% 0.0% 3.6% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 41 -2.5% -0.6% 12.2% 12.2% 24.4% 22.5% 63.4% 59.0% 0.0% 6.3% Male 23 -18.1% -0.9% 17.4% 13.1% 34.8% 22.0% 47.8% 58.3% 0.0% 6.7% Female 18 17.4% -0.2% 5.6% 11.3% 11.1% 23.0% 83.3% 59.8% 0.0% 5.9% White 36 -2.0% 11.3% 13.9% 6.7% 22.2% 16.1% 63.9% 67.8% 0.0% 9.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 20 -10.9% -12.1% 15.0% 17.8% 30.0% 28.5% 55.0% 51.1% 0.0% 2.7% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 43 15.1% 8.7% 11.6% 11.6% 18.6% 25.1% 44.2% 39.5% 25.6% 23.8% Male 16 -17.2% 6.4% 25.0% 13.6% 37.5% 25.3% 25.0% 37.7% 12.5% 23.4% Female 27 34.2% 11.0% 3.7% 9.5% 7.4% 24.9% 55.6% 41.5% 33.3% 24.2% White 40 17.8% 19.7% 10.0% 6.6% 17.5% 19.1% 45.0% 41.6% 27.5% 32.7% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 21 16.8% -2.4% 14.3% 16.2% 14.3% 31.5% 57.1% 38.3% 14.3% 14.0% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 51 19.8% 4.5% 3.9% 14.3% 21.6% 26.5% 47.1% 38.2% 27.5% 20.9% Male 28 20.3% 2.1% 7.1% 16.7% 17.9% 26.6% 46.4% 36.0% 28.6% 20.7% Female 23 19.2% 6.9% 0.0% 11.9% 26.1% 26.5% 47.8% 40.5% 26.1% 21.1% White 47 17.7% 16.3% 4.3% 8.7% 23.4% 20.3% 46.8% 41.7% 25.5% 29.3% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 15 -8.0% -8.5% 6.7% 20.3% 46.7% 33.5% 33.3% 34.9% 13.3% 11.3% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 32 6.7% 14.8% 12.5% 15.2% 37.5% 26.7% 40.6% 39.2% 9.4% 18.9% Male 10 -3.3% 12.1% 20.0% 18.1% 40.0% 26.5% 40.0% 36.1% 0.0% 19.3% Female 22 11.2% 17.6% 9.1% 12.2% 36.4% 26.8% 40.9% 42.5% 13.6% 18.5% White 27 8.6% 27.2% 3.7% 9.0% 44.4% 20.5% 44.4% 42.9% 7.4% 27.7% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 17 21.4% 1.5% 0.0% 21.2% 35.3% 34.0% 52.9% 35.8% 11.8% 9.0% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 8
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
12.8%Nevada:
8.8%
Meets Standard This School:
48.7%Nevada:
55.0%
Meadow Valley Middle School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective
Male
This School : Nevada :
Female
This School : State :
White
This School : Nevada :
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
This School : State :
Detailed Students Results Percent of Meadow Valley Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 39 -17.2% -6.7% 12.8% 8.8% 38.5% 32.0% 48.7% 55.0% 0.0% 4.2% Male 22 -29.5% -8.8% 18.2% 10.3% 45.5% 32.6% 36.4% 52.9% 0.0% 4.3% Female 17 -1.2% -4.6% 5.9% 7.2% 29.4% 31.4% 64.7% 57.2% 0.0% 4.2% White 36 -15.9% 3.4% 13.9% 5.5% 36.1% 25.2% 50.0% 63.5% 0.0% 5.9% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 19 -39.6% -16.9% 21.1% 12.1% 52.6% 39.0% 26.3% 47.0% 0.0% 2.0% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 43 -26.4% -10.0% 16.3% 13.5% 44.2% 30.6% 39.5% 52.2% 0.0% 3.7% Male 15 -39.2% -10.5% 26.7% 14.2% 46.7% 30.4% 26.7% 51.6% 0.0% 3.8% Female 28 -19.5% -9.5% 10.7% 12.8% 42.9% 30.8% 46.4% 52.8% 0.0% 3.6% White 39 -24.9% 0.6% 15.4% 8.6% 43.6% 25.0% 41.0% 61.1% 0.0% 5.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 22 -43.2% -22.1% 27.3% 19.4% 50.0% 36.8% 22.7% 42.3% 0.0% 1.5% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 53 1.9% 0.0% 7.5% 13.0% 35.8% 32.3% 49.1% 41.1% 7.5% 13.6% Male 28 9.6% 0.1% 14.3% 14.0% 21.4% 31.2% 53.6% 40.3% 10.7% 14.5% Female 25 -6.7% -0.1% 0.0% 12.1% 52.0% 33.4% 44.0% 41.8% 4.0% 12.7% White 49 0.4% 12.4% 8.2% 7.1% 36.7% 25.9% 49.0% 47.6% 6.1% 19.5% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 18 -15.8% -12.8% 5.6% 18.7% 55.6% 39.4% 38.9% 35.3% 0.0% 6.5% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 39 -15.2% -2.3% 2.6% 17.0% 57.9% 30.7% 36.8% 41.9% 2.6% 10.4% Male 15 -21.3% -3.4% 6.7% 18.3% 60.0% 30.4% 33.3% 40.3% 0.0% 11.0% Female 24 -11.2% -1.2% 0.0% 15.5% 56.5% 31.1% 39.1% 43.6% 4.3% 9.8% White 32 -9.5% 11.1% 3.2% 9.4% 51.6% 24.8% 41.9% 49.8% 3.2% 15.9% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 18 -19.4% -15.8% 0.0% 24.2% 64.7% 36.9% 35.3% 34.9% 0.0% 4.0% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 45 3.4% 9.5% 11.1% 19.0% 42.2% 28.2% 42.2% 43.1% 4.4% 9.7% Male 18 -10.0% 8.9% 11.1% 20.6% 55.6% 27.2% 27.8% 41.8% 5.6% 10.4% Female 27 12.3% 10.1% 11.1% 17.3% 33.3% 29.3% 51.9% 44.5% 3.7% 8.9% White 43 5.5% 23.5% 11.6% 10.4% 39.5% 22.8% 44.2% 52.5% 4.7% 14.2% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 20 11.7% -4.8% 10.0% 26.6% 35.0% 34.8% 50.0% 34.5% 5.0% 4.0% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 55 14.9% 7.2% 14.5% 16.4% 27.3% 33.2% 49.1% 39.8% 9.1% 10.7% Male 29 8.4% 6.0% 17.2% 18.6% 31.0% 32.1% 37.9% 38.0% 13.8% 11.3% Female 26 22.1% 8.3% 11.5% 14.1% 23.1% 34.3% 61.5% 41.6% 3.8% 10.1% White 51 13.6% 20.0% 15.7% 9.5% 27.5% 27.2% 47.1% 47.4% 9.8% 15.9% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 27 4.8% -8.4% 14.8% 24.3% 37.0% 40.8% 44.4% 30.9% 3.7% 4.0% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 38 17.2% 5.7% 18.4% 19.6% 21.1% 31.4% 50.0% 38.1% 10.5% 10.9% Male 23 4.5% 5.1% 30.4% 22.1% 21.7% 29.5% 39.1% 36.7% 8.7% 11.7% Female 15 36.7% 6.7% 0.0% 16.5% 20.0% 33.5% 66.7% 39.8% 13.3% 10.1% White 33 17.3% 18.2% 21.2% 11.6% 18.2% 26.9% 51.5% 45.7% 9.1% 15.8% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 15 -10.0% -9.6% 26.7% 28.9% 40.0% 37.4% 26.7% 29.4% 6.7% 4.3% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 54 26.5% 15.9% 13.2% 18.7% 28.3% 33.4% 49.1% 37.5% 9.4% 10.4% Male 29 28.7% 15.0% 7.1% 21.4% 32.1% 31.5% 53.6% 35.7% 7.1% 11.3% Female 25 24.0% 17.1% 20.0% 15.5% 24.0% 35.4% 44.0% 39.6% 12.0% 9.5% White 46 28.0% 28.6% 13.3% 11.6% 26.7% 27.7% 48.9% 45.7% 11.1% 14.9% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 31 18.0% -0.4% 13.3% 27.4% 36.7% 41.0% 46.7% 27.6% 3.3% 4.0% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 7 Students Tested: 40
Meadow Valley Middle School:
100.0%State:
99.6%
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
20.0%Nevada:
24.4%
Approaches Standard This School:
22.5%Nevada:
22.0%
Meets Standard This School:
32.5%State:
35.3%
Meadow Valley Middle School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective
All Students
This School : State :
Male
Here : State :
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
Here : State :
Detailed Students Results Percent of Meadow Valley Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 40 -8.4% -12.2% 20.0% 24.4% 22.5% 22.0% 32.5% 35.3% 25.0% 18.4% Male 19 -18.5% -19.0% 36.8% 30.6% 15.8% 22.5% 31.6% 32.8% 15.8% 14.1% Female 21 0.8% -5.1% 4.8% 17.8% 28.6% 21.5% 33.3% 38.0% 33.3% 22.9% White 38 -8.0% 0.2% 18.4% 16.0% 23.7% 17.9% 34.2% 39.5% 23.7% 26.6% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 17 -18.8% -23.9% 23.5% 32.4% 29.4% 25.5% 23.5% 31.6% 23.5% 10.5% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 41 12.1% 8.1% 9.8% 4.7% 12.2% 21.3% 58.5% 49.5% 19.5% 24.5% Male 23 -0.7% 3.3% 13.0% 6.5% 21.7% 24.3% 56.5% 48.2% 8.7% 21.1% Female 18 28.5% 13.0% 5.6% 2.9% 0.0% 18.2% 61.1% 50.8% 33.3% 28.1% White 36 11.9% 17.8% 11.1% 2.8% 11.1% 13.5% 55.6% 48.4% 22.2% 35.3% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 20 -0.9% -2.0% 15.0% 7.2% 20.0% 28.9% 50.0% 49.7% 15.0% 14.2% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 43 17.4% 14.9% 4.7% 5.5% 23.3% 25.0% 55.8% 50.6% 16.3% 18.9% Male 16 -17.2% 9.3% 12.5% 7.3% 50.0% 28.7% 31.3% 47.8% 6.3% 16.1% Female 27 37.9% 20.8% 0.0% 3.5% 7.4% 21.1% 70.4% 53.5% 22.2% 21.9% White 40 15.3% 25.2% 5.0% 2.9% 25.0% 17.2% 55.0% 52.7% 15.0% 27.2% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 21 12.0% 4.4% 9.5% 7.9% 23.8% 33.1% 52.4% 48.8% 14.3% 10.2% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 51 21.8% 9.6% 2.0% 10.2% 21.6% 25.5% 58.8% 52.2% 17.6% 12.0% Male 28 13.2% 3.3% 3.6% 13.9% 28.6% 28.1% 42.9% 49.0% 25.0% 8.9% Female 23 32.3% 16.1% 0.0% 6.5% 13.0% 22.8% 78.3% 55.5% 8.7% 15.2% White 47 19.8% 20.9% 2.1% 5.9% 23.4% 18.6% 57.4% 57.8% 17.0% 17.7% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 15 18.7% -2.9% 0.0% 14.7% 26.7% 33.5% 66.7% 46.3% 6.7% 5.4% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 32 16.1% 21.2% 6.3% 8.5% 34.4% 27.0% 53.1% 50.5% 6.3% 14.0% Male 10 -13.3% 14.9% 20.0% 11.5% 50.0% 30.3% 30.0% 47.1% 0.0% 11.0% Female 22 29.4% 27.9% 0.0% 5.3% 27.3% 23.5% 63.6% 54.1% 9.1% 17.2% White 27 23.4% 32.9% 7.4% 4.5% 25.9% 19.3% 59.3% 55.0% 7.4% 21.2% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 17 15.5% 8.7% 0.0% 12.0% 41.2% 36.0% 52.9% 45.8% 5.9% 6.2% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 8 Students Tested: 39
This School:
100.0%State:
99.5%
Studets Results in 2010/2011
Meets Standard This School:
28.2%State:
26.6%
Exceeds Standard This School:
10.3%Nevada:
18.0%
Meadow Valley Middle School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective
All Students
Here : State :
Male
This School : Nevada :
Female
Here : Nevada :
White
This School : State :
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
This School : Nevada :
Detailed Students Results Percent of Meadow Valley Middle School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 39 -27.4% -21.3% 28.2% 27.6% 33.3% 27.8% 28.2% 26.6% 10.3% 18.0% Male 22 -47.7% -26.7% 40.9% 33.0% 40.9% 27.8% 9.1% 24.4% 9.1% 14.8% Female 17 -1.2% -15.6% 11.8% 22.0% 23.5% 27.7% 52.9% 29.0% 11.8% 21.3% White 36 -27.0% -9.3% 25.0% 19.3% 36.1% 24.1% 27.8% 30.8% 11.1% 25.9% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 19 -39.6% -32.6% 42.1% 36.1% 31.6% 30.6% 21.1% 22.8% 5.3% 10.5% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 43 3.9% 0.1% 2.3% 3.7% 27.9% 30.4% 53.5% 44.0% 16.3% 22.0% Male 15 -25.9% -4.7% 6.7% 4.9% 53.3% 33.9% 33.3% 42.7% 6.7% 18.5% Female 28 19.8% 5.1% 0.0% 2.3% 14.3% 26.7% 64.3% 45.4% 21.4% 25.6% White 39 5.9% 10.5% 2.6% 1.9% 25.6% 21.7% 53.8% 46.4% 17.9% 30.0% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 22 -15.9% -11.1% 4.5% 5.5% 45.5% 39.8% 31.8% 41.9% 18.2% 12.9% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 53 13.3% 6.2% 1.9% 5.1% 30.2% 34.0% 52.8% 46.2% 15.1% 14.7% Male 28 6.0% 0.3% 0.0% 7.2% 39.3% 37.9% 42.9% 43.6% 17.9% 11.4% Female 25 21.3% 12.4% 4.0% 2.9% 20.0% 30.1% 64.0% 48.9% 12.0% 18.2% White 49 10.6% 18.0% 2.0% 2.9% 32.7% 24.5% 51.0% 51.2% 14.3% 21.5% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 18 6.4% -6.2% 0.0% 7.2% 38.9% 44.3% 55.6% 41.6% 5.6% 6.8% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 39 3.2% -0.5% 2.6% 8.7% 39.5% 37.1% 47.4% 42.3% 10.5% 11.8% Male 15 -8.0% -5.9% 6.7% 11.2% 46.7% 40.0% 40.0% 39.5% 6.7% 9.4% Female 24 10.5% 5.3% 0.0% 6.1% 34.8% 33.9% 52.2% 45.4% 13.0% 14.5% White 32 6.6% 13.8% 0.0% 4.4% 38.7% 27.1% 48.4% 50.5% 12.9% 18.0% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 18 4.2% -15.2% 5.9% 12.6% 35.3% 48.0% 52.9% 34.4% 5.9% 5.1% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 45 12.3% 13.6% 2.2% 7.3% 42.2% 35.9% 48.9% 44.3% 6.7% 12.5% Male 18 -4.4% 7.9% 5.6% 9.8% 55.6% 39.0% 33.3% 41.3% 5.6% 9.9% Female 27 23.4% 19.6% 0.0% 4.6% 33.3% 32.5% 59.3% 47.5% 7.4% 15.3% White 43 14.8% 27.6% 2.3% 3.7% 39.5% 25.4% 51.2% 51.9% 7.0% 19.1% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 20 6.7% -0.8% 0.0% 10.1% 50.0% 47.4% 45.0% 37.0% 5.0% 5.5% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 55 18.5% 7.7% 1.8% 8.3% 36.4% 40.7% 43.6% 37.1% 18.2% 13.9% Male 29 8.4% 2.8% 3.4% 11.0% 44.8% 42.9% 34.5% 34.3% 17.2% 11.9% Female 26 29.8% 12.8% 0.0% 5.4% 26.9% 38.5% 53.8% 40.1% 19.2% 16.0% White 51 17.5% 21.3% 2.0% 4.6% 37.3% 30.8% 41.2% 44.3% 19.6% 20.3% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 27 8.6% -7.7% 0.0% 12.5% 48.1% 51.9% 40.7% 29.5% 11.1% 6.1% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 38 14.6% 7.6% 2.6% 10.6% 39.5% 38.6% 39.5% 38.0% 18.4% 12.8% Male 23 -4.2% 3.3% 4.3% 13.1% 56.5% 40.3% 30.4% 36.0% 8.7% 10.6% Female 15 43.4% 12.5% 0.0% 7.6% 13.3% 36.6% 53.3% 40.4% 33.3% 15.3% White 33 17.3% 22.2% 3.0% 5.2% 36.4% 29.3% 42.4% 46.3% 18.2% 19.2% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 15 -3.3% -9.3% 0.0% 16.8% 60.0% 49.2% 33.3% 28.5% 6.7% 5.5% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 54 39.7% 17.6% 9.4% 11.7% 18.9% 38.7% 58.5% 35.9% 13.2% 13.7% Male 29 39.4% 12.8% 7.1% 14.7% 21.4% 40.5% 67.9% 33.8% 3.6% 11.0% Female 25 40.0% 23.0% 12.0% 8.5% 16.0% 36.5% 48.0% 38.3% 24.0% 16.7% White 46 41.3% 31.8% 8.9% 7.1% 17.8% 29.2% 60.0% 43.3% 13.3% 20.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 31 31.3% 0.0% 6.7% 18.1% 30.0% 49.9% 60.0% 26.8% 3.3% 5.2% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
All Cities Nevada Forum Nevada Panaca, NV Meadow Valley Middle School in Panaca, Nevada (NV)
6.5%
-3.0%
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: