Middle Tt School in Tampa, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 45.

901 E KENNEDY BLVD
Tampa, FL 33602

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Terrace Community Middle School (9.8 miles):

92
East Lake High School (19.6 miles):

74
Trinity Upper School (3.3 miles):

60
Pivot Charter School (14.2 miles):

46
Middle Tt School:

45
Roland Park K-8 School (4.1 miles):

36
Fitzgerald Middle School (17.4 miles):

21
Carl Sagan Academy School (4.7 miles):

4
Pace Center For Girls School (17.5 miles):

0
Middle Tt School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Hillsborough County:

42
Tampa:

41
Middle Tt School:

45

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (813) 272-4000 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 29
School number: 90
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: HILLSBOROUGH
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

87%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

77%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

83%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

55%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

79%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

65%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

73%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

73%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

592
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

28%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

14%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 4

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 144 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 144 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 140
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 135

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 140
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 135
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 125 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 125 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 118

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 118
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

82%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

76%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

78%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

65%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

55%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

60%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

47%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

531
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Math: NO

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

29%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

15%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 137 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 137 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 128

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 128
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 119 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 119 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 114
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 113

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 114
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 113
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

88%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

70%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

48%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

40%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

55%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

83%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

67%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

529
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

21%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

13%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 136 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 136 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 123
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 118

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 123
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 118
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 117 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 117 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1479
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

8%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

4%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

45%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

34%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

89%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1741
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

347
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

34%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

25%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

81%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

21
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

1698
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

34%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

79%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

11
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1995
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

30%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

56%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2008
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

64%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

26%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

34%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

20%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

40%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

15
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

19%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

30%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

41%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

3%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

51%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

9
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

314
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

22%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

35%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

4%
State average:

5%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

44%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1490
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

29%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

23%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

75%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1663
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

347
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

15%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

34%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

19%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

83%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1622
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

13%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

34%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

26%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

53%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

1987
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

29%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

74%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2029
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

326
Percent Passing
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

87%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

41%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

77%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1469
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

1624
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 07%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1672
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

1975
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1996
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1457
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1504
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

1660
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1979
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2012
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 85%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 44
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 461
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1372
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1671
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 20
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1767
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1951
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1968
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

1339
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1541
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1634
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1966
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

314
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2004
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 84%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

50
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

627
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

56
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

42
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

660
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

76
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

44
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

677
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

80
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

430
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

699
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

66
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

378
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

711
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

68
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
MIDDLE SCHOOL TT:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 41
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

269
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 29%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 41%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 408
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

312
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 62%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 88%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.