
Back to: Clearwater, FL, Florida, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.
Citydata.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 77.
401 S OLD COACHMAN ROAD
Clearwater, FL 33765
Other nearby schools ratings:
Plato Academy Charter School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida:  45  Pinellas County:  51  Clearwater:  44  Plato Academy Charter School:  77 
Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:
Latest news about schools in Clearwater, FL collected exclusively by citydata.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations
Phone: (727) 7932400 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 52
School number: 7181
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: PINELLAS
Grade range: GRADES KINDERGARTEN TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (727) 7932405
Principal: Steve Christopoulos
Regular charter school.
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 9
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 50
Senate District: 13
School Web Address: http://www.platoacademy.net
20092010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  91%  State average from 79 schools:  71% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  90%  State average from 79 schools:  70% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  93%  State average from 79 schools:  82% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  87%  State average from 79 schools:  52% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  69%  State average from 79 schools:  64% 
Making Math GainsHere:  71%  State average from 78 schools:  67% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  74%  State average from 79 schools:  61% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  73%  State average from 79 schools:  66% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  648  State average from 79 schools:  530 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 78 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  22%  State average from 80 schools:  54% 
Minority RateHere:  23%  State average from 80 schools:  47% 
Region: 4
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20092010
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 162 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 162 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  91%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 140
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  90%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 140
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 117 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 117 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  89%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 114
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 100
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  89%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 114
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 100
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 6
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 16
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 6
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  90%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  88%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 38
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20082009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  95%  State average from 74 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  84%  State average from 74 schools:  70% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  86%  State average from 74 schools:  87% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  68%  State average from 74 schools:  52% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  86%  State average from 74 schools:  69% 
Making Math GainsHere:  64%  State average from 74 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  97%  State average from 74 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  70%  State average from 74 schools:  68% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  650  State average from 74 schools:  556 
Percent TestedHere:  98%  State average from 74 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  20%  State average from 74 schools:  47% 
Minority RateHere:  22%  State average from 74 schools:  44% 
Region: 4
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20082009
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 122 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 122 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 109
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  84%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 109
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 95 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 95 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 83
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientPLATO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL:  83%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 83
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 5
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 13
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientPLATO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  87%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 30
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20072008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  91%  State average from 73 schools:  71% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  88%  State average from 73 schools:  69% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  81%  State average from 73 schools:  81% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  45%  State average from 73 schools:  47% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  84%  State average from 73 schools:  66% 
Making Math GainsHere:  53%  State average from 73 schools:  70% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  84%  State average from 73 schools:  63% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  53%  State average from 73 schools:  69% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  579  State average from 73 schools:  537 
Percent TestedHere:  98%  State average from 73 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RatePLATO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL:  23%  State average from 72 schools:  45% 
Minority RateHere:  24%  State average from 73 schools:  43% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20072008
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 77 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 77 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  91%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 67
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  88%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 67
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 47
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  89%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 47
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 4
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 8
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 18
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20062007
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (96%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  100%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  90%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  90%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: BLACK
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20052006
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15 (100%)
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 15
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 15
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 12
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: BLACK
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010  2011 Results
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1603  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  350  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  39%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  39%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  97%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1754  State average:  1604 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  349  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  16%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3PLATO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL:  24%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4PLATO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL:  49%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  11%  State average:  11% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  84%  State average:  72% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1815  State average:  1659 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  340  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  10%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  34%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  46%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  90%  State average:  70% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1945  State average:  1716 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  353  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  10%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  25%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  35%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 5PLATO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL:  25%  State average:  9% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  85%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1951  State average:  1810 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  344  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  48%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  38%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  95%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9PLATO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL:  5  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  356  State average:  321 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  15%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  51%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  32%  State average:  11% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  85%  State average:  51% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13PLATO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL:  10  State average:  8 
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12PLATO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL:  10  State average:  9 
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1636  State average:  1481 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  373  State average:  339 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  19%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  64%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  17%  State average:  16% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  100%  State average:  79% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1681  State average:  1585 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  352  State average:  330 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  24%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4PLATO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL:  53%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  13%  State average:  11% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  91%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1788  State average:  1674 
Mean Scale Score 100500PLATO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL:  358  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  12%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  41%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  32%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AbovePLATO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL:  88%  State average:  63% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8PLATO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL:  7  State average:  6 
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1812  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500PLATO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL:  342  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  10%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  15%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  35%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 4PLATO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL:  20%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 5PLATO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL:  20%  State average:  8% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  75%  State average:  55% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1826  State average:  1786 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  315  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  19%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  62%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  14%  State average:  19% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  76%  State average:  57% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1563  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  343  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 97%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1774  State average:  1605 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  353  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 2: 03%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 97%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1885  State average:  1656 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  352  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 96%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1790  State average:  1707 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  326  State average:  310 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  337  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1652  State average:  1476 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  376  State average:  338 
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 36%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1700  State average:  1578 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  356  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 97%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1758  State average:  1675 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  352  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1706  State average:  1679 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  317  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009  2010 Writing Results
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 38
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 50%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 13%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 87%
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1543  State average:  1396 
Mean Scale Score 100500PLATO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL:  340  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1765  State average:  1582 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  351  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 73%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 100%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 22
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1661  State average:  1627 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  312  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  302  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1586  State average:  1461 
Mean Scale Score 100500PLATO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL:  362  State average:  335 
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 97%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1732  State average:  1563 
Mean Scale Score 100500PLATO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL:  363  State average:  325 
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 100%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1666  State average:  1668 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  332  State average:  333 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008  2009 NormReferenced Test
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  654  State average from 3241 schools:  633 
Literary (max 18)PLATO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL:  15  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)PLATO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL:  10  State average:  9 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  674  State average from 3233 schools:  653 
Median NPRPLATO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL:  84  State average:  69 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)PLATO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL:  8  State average:  7 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScorePLATO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL:  673  State average from 3309 schools:  667 
Literary (max 18)PLATO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL:  14  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)PLATO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL:  10  State average:  9 
Strategies (max 10)PLATO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL:  6  State average:  6 
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 21
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  329  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 86%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 10
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 14
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 71%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 81%
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1576  State average:  1342 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  345  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 63%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 100%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000PLATO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL:  1674  State average from 1875 schools:  1542 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  335  State average:  313 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 17%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1637  State average:  1546 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1423  State average:  1397 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 213
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1629  State average:  1413 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  371  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 100%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1661  State average from 1874 schools:  1525 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  347  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 11%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1541  State average:  1528 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1633  State average:  1414 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 92
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 16
Mean Scale ScorePLATO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL:  661  State average from 1891 schools:  633 
Median NPR: 81
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 18
Mean Scale ScorePLATO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL:  654  State average from 1874 schools:  642 
Median NPR: 71
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 16
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  670  State average from 1891 schools:  632 
Median NPR: 90
Number Sense (max 14): 12
Operations (max 11): 10
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 9
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 18
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  668  State average from 1874 schools:  652 
Median NPR: 85
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 9
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 18
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  312  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 72%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 72%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 14
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 61%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 94%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 67%
