Polo Park Middle School in Wellington, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 57.

11901 LAKE WORTH RD
Wellington, FL 33449

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Bak Middle Of The Arts School (12.6 miles):

94
Western Academy Charter School (4.1 miles):

64
Polo Park Middle School:

57
Village Academy On The Art & Sara Jo Kobacker Campus School (14.8 miles):

55
S. D. Spady Elementary School (14.3 miles):

46
Jeaga Middle School (9.7 miles):

37
Carver Middle School (13.6 miles):

27
Indian Ridge School (7.1 miles):

8
Polo Park Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Palm Beach County:

45
Wellington:

67
Polo Park Middle School:

57

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (561) 333-5500 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 50
School number: 2611
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: PALM BEACH
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (561) 333-5505
Principal: William Latson
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 23
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 85
Senate District: 30
School Web Address: www.palmbeach.k12.fl.us/PoloParkMS

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

79%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

77%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

71%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
POLO PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL:

60%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

65%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

580
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

35%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
POLO PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL:

55%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 5

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1141 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1141 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 338
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1077
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1025

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1077
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1027
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 519 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 519 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 166
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 503
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 483

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 502
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 482
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 223 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 223 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 56
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 202
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 189

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
POLO PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 202
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 190
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 295 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 295 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 85
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 273
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 258

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 274
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 260
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 392 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 392 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 88
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 357
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 340

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 357
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 341
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 143 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 143 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 135
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 126

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 136
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 127
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

80%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

79%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

96%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

59%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

70%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

592
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

29%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
POLO PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL:

48%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1070 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1070 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 330
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1018
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 982

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1018
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 982
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 554 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 554 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 182
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 536
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 518

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 536
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 518
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 183 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 183 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 168
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 162

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 168
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 162
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 238 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 238 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 65
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 222
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 212

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 222
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 212
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 311 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 311 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 71
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 284
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 271

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 284
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 271
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 138 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 138 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 132
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 124

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 132
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 124
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

79%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

82%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

97%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

64%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

75%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

60%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

592
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

17%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
POLO PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL:

42%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1031 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1031 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 335
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 990
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 938

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 990
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 937
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 596 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 596 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 213
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 585
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 558

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 585
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 557
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 138 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 138 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 122
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 110

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 123
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 111
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 215 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 215 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 63
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 205
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 193

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 204
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 192
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 179 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 179 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 163
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 150

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
POLO PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 151
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 118 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 118 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

59%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
POLO PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL:

58%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

94%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

32%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

63%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

502
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

53%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

72%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1200 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1200 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
POLO PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 421
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1142
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1142
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 334 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 333 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

99%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 110
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 327
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 326
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 563 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 564 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 206
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
POLO PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 529
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 530
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 221 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 221 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 78
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 206
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 206
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 640 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 641 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 227
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 602
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 603
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 121 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 121 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 111
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 111
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 120 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 119 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 111
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 110
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

61%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

62%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

76%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

430
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

50%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

71%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1311 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1311 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 446
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1255
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1254
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 390 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 390 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 137

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 381
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 381
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 612 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 612 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 215
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 577
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 577
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 222 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 222 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 60

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 211
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 210
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 17

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 39

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 644 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 644 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 204
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 614
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 613
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 129 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 129 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 35
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 125
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 125
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 140 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 140 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 47
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 132
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 132
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

54%
State average from 505 schools:

59%
Meeting High Standards in Math
POLO PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL:

59%
State average from 505 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

88%
State average from 506 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 505 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 505 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

69%
State average from 505 schools:

66%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

394
State average from 506 schools:

397
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 506 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

49%
State average from 506 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

68%
State average from 506 schools:

50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1789
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

25%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

74%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1860
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

27%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

73%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
POLO PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1962
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
POLO PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL:

10%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

41%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

25%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

71%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
POLO PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
POLO PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL:

14%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
POLO PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL:

21%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

44%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

15%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

66%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1737
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
POLO PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL:

31%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

63%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
POLO PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1868
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

25%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

12%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

68%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1972
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
POLO PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
POLO PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

40%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
POLO PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL:

23%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

19%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

82%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1757
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
POLO PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1915
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1938
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
POLO PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL:

321
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1737
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1911
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1942
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 346
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 95%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1823
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1870
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1972
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1775
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1898
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1983
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

342
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

324
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

689
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

78
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
POLO PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL:

14
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
POLO PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
POLO PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

357
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

697
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

79
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
POLO PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
POLO PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
POLO PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL:

353
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

708
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
POLO PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL:

81
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
POLO PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL:

15
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 346
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

318
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 56%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 46%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 96%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1633
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1654
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1579
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 75

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1777
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1787
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1676
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 111

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
POLO PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1868
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1872
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1795
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 77

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
POLO PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1668
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1686
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1688
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -2

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1787
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1804
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1676
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 128

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1879
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1888
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1806
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 82

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 415
Mean Scale Score
Here:

671
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 63
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 353
Mean Scale Score
Here:

679
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 65
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 434
Mean Scale Score
Here:

693
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 70
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 416
Mean Scale Score
Here:

670
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 64
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 353
Mean Scale Score
Here:

685
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 70
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 434
Mean Scale Score
Here:

701
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 72
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 428
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

297
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 48%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 91%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 84%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Wellington, FL
  5. Polo Park Middle School in Wellington, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.