Richard E. Byrd Middle School in Los Angeles, CA
(06-08 • Public • Regular School)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in California) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 20
- Address
- 8501 Arleta Ave.
Los Angeles, CA 91352
- Telephone
- (818) 394-4300
(make sure to verify first before calling)
- City-data.com school rating
- 20
- Students
- 1,602
- Classroom Teachers (FTE)
- 61.0
- National School Lunch
Program (NSLP) Status - Yes, under Community Eligibility Option (CEO)
- Free lunch eligible students
- 1,169
- Reduced-price lunch
eligible students - 229
- School district
- Los Angeles Unified
- Charter school
- No
- Title I status
- Title I schoolwide school
- Magnet School Indicator
- Yes
- Shared Time Indicator
- Missing
- Adult education offered
- No
No street view available for this location
Ratings
This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
Richard E. Byrd Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:California: | 46 |
Los Angeles County: | 44 |
Los Angeles: | 36 |
Richard E. Byrd Middle School: | 20 |
Students & Teachers
Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 1,602
Enrollment in 2015: 1,666
Enrollment in 2014: 1,713
Enrollment in 2013: 1,662
Enrollment in 2012: 1,684
Enrollment in 2011: 1,756
Enrollment in 2010: 1,768
Enrollment in 2009: 1,743
Enrollment in 2008: 1,738
Enrollment in 2007: 1,824
Enrollment in 2006: 1,877
Enrollment in 2005: 1,999
Enrollment in 2004: 2,050
Enrollment in 2003: 2,087
Enrollment in 2002: 1,979
Enrollment in 2001: 1,834
Enrollment in 2000: 1,843
Enrollment in 1999: 1,798
Richard E. Byrd Middle School - Historical enrollment
Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
Grade | G06 | G07 | G08 | Total |
---|
All students | 478 | 538 | 586 | 1,602 |
Female students | 238 | 286 | 278 | 802 |
Male students | 240 | 252 | 308 | 800 |
American Indian/Alaska Native students | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Asian students | 16 | 30 | 24 | 70 |
Hispanic students | 444 | 488 | 542 | 1,474 |
Black students | 4 | 3 | 3 | 10 |
White students | 11 | 14 | 13 | 38 |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students | - | - | 2 | 2 |
Two or More Races students | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
Enrollment by grade:
6th grade enrollment: 478
7th grade enrollment: 538
8th grade enrollment: 586
Richard E. Byrd Middle School - Historical enrollment by grade
Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
Female enrollment: 802 (50.1%)School: | 50.1% |
California: | 49.4% |
Male enrollment: 800 (49.9%)
Richard E. Byrd Middle School - Historical enrollment by gender
Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 3 (0.2%)
Asian enrollment: 70 (4.4%)
Hispanic enrollment: 1,474 (92.0%)
Black enrollment: 10 (0.6%)Richard E. Byrd Middle School: | 0.6% |
California: | 6.1% |
White enrollment: 38 (2.4%)Here: | 2.4% |
California: | 28.3% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 2 (0.1%)School: | 0.1% |
California: | 0.6% |
Two or More Races enrollment: 5 (0.3%)School: | 0.3% |
California: | 4.5% |
Richard E. Byrd Middle School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity
Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 10,111 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 1,398 (87.3%)
Free lunch eligible students: 1,169 (73.0%)Richard E. Byrd Middle School: | 73.0% |
State: | 52.8% |
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 229 (14.3%)
Richard E. Byrd Middle School - Lunch Program Eligibility
Teachers and support:
(State average from 12,394 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 61
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 3
Number of FTE school counselors: 5
Number of FTE nurses: 2
Number of FTE psychologists: 3
Richard E. Byrd Middle School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio
School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds:
$5,562,826- Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 54.1 (Salary Expenditures: $4,260,494)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 2.8 (Salary Expenditures: $33,946)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 5.5 (Salary Expenditures: $662,522)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 7.5 (Salary Expenditures: $605,863)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds:
$491,628Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,:
$8,072,909- Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $5,569,858
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 19 (Salary Expenditures: $573,301)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 11.5 (Salary Expenditures: $1,323,724)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 7.5 (Salary Expenditures: $606,027)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds:
$521,617 Limited English Proficiency:
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs
- Hispanic202
- American Indian2
- Asian10
- Native Hawaiian2
- White5
- Multirace2
- IDEA100
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 223 (male: 135, female: 88)
- Hispanic: 202 (male: 119, female: 83)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
- Asian: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 2 (all male)
- White: 5 (all male)
- Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 100 (male: 71, female: 29)
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs
- Hispanic307
- American Indian2
- Asian16
- Native Hawaiian2
- White2
- IDEA139
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 329 (male: 211, female: 118)
- Hispanic: 307 (male: 194, female: 113)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
- Asian: 16 (male: 11, female: 5)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 2 (all male)
- White: 2 (all male)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 139 (male: 98, female: 41)
Students with disabilities:
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.
Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 210 (male: 158, female: 52)
- Hispanic: 200 (male: 148, female: 52)
- White: 10 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 113 (male: 79, female: 34)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 15 (male: 10, female: 5)
- Hispanic: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
- White: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
Students with disabilities served under IDEA
- Hispanic242
- Asian7
- White4
- LEP143
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 253 (male: 180, female: 73)
- Hispanic: 242 (male: 169, female: 73)
- Asian: 7 (all male)
- White: 4 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 143 (male: 100, female: 43)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 9 (male: 5, female: 4)
- Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 2 (all female)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
Gifted and Talented:
(State average from 5,551 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment
- Hispanic217
- Asian22
- Black4
- White7
- LEP4
- IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 250 (male: 134, female: 116)
- Hispanic: 217 (male: 113, female: 104)
- Asian: 22 (male: 14, female: 8)
- Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment
- Hispanic211
- Asian22
- Native Hawaiian2
- Black4
- White7
- Multirace2
- LEP2
- IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 248 (male: 130, female: 118)
- Hispanic: 211 (male: 110, female: 101)
- Asian: 22 (male: 11, female: 11)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 2 (all female)
- Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 studentsSchool: | 154.8 |
California: | 93.6 |
Statewide Student Assessments
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments:
(State average from 10,463 schools)
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments (SB) is one of the online summative assessments - part of California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System.
The summative assessments are comprehensive, end-of-year assessments of grade-level learning that measure progress toward college and career readiness. Each test in English language arts/literacy (ELA) and mathematics is comprised of two parts: (1) a computer-adaptive test and (2) a performance task, administered within a selected testing window available at 66 percent of the instructional year for grades three through eight, and grade eleven.
The summative assessments are aligned with the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for ELA and mathematics. The tests capitalize on the strengths of computer adaptive testing efficient and precise measurement across the full range of achievement and timely turnaround of results.
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All29%
- Males24%
- Females34%
- Asian61%
- Filipino73%
- Hispanic27%
- White29%
ELA students tested: 1,439
ELA students with scores: 1,439
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 29% |
California: | 49% |
Standard Not Met:
39.5%Standard Nearly Met:
31.2%Standard Met:
22.8%Standard Exceeded:
6.5%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2483.1, Students tested: 458, Standard Not Met: 37.8%, Nearly Met: 32.5%, Met: 23.4%, Exceeded: 6.3%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2495.7, Students tested: 450, Standard Not Met: 45.6%, Nearly Met: 27.3%, Met: 19.1%, Exceeded: 8.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2520.0, Students tested: 531, Standard Not Met: 36.0%, Nearly Met: 33.3%, Met: 25.4%, Exceeded: 5.3%)Richard E. Byrd Middle School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All19%
- Males18%
- Females20%
- Asian57%
- Filipino50%
- Hispanic17%
- White11%
Math students tested: 1,464
Math students with scores: 1,464
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 19% |
State: | 38% |
Standard Not Met:
52.5%Standard Nearly Met:
28.2%Standard Met:
12.0%Standard Exceeded:
7.2%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2476.0, Students tested: 462, Standard Not Met: 44.2%, Nearly Met: 34.9%, Met: 16.0%, Exceeded: 5.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2474.7, Students tested: 461, Standard Not Met: 54.9%, Nearly Met: 28.0%, Met: 9.5%, Exceeded: 7.6%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2494.9, Students tested: 541, Standard Not Met: 57.7%, Nearly Met: 22.7%, Met: 10.7%, Exceeded: 8.9%)Richard E. Byrd Middle School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All30%
- Males23%
- Females36%
- Asian50%
- Filipino73%
- Hispanic28%
- White21%
ELA students tested: 1,561
ELA students with scores: 1,561
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 30% |
California: | 48% |
Standard Not Met:
40.0%Standard Nearly Met:
30.0%Standard Met:
24.0%Standard Exceeded:
6.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2481.7, Students tested: 464, Standard Not Met: 41.0%, Nearly Met: 31.0%, Met: 20.0%, Exceeded: 8.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2497.7, Students tested: 534, Standard Not Met: 44.0%, Nearly Met: 26.0%, Met: 24.0%, Exceeded: 6.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2524.1, Students tested: 563, Standard Not Met: 36.0%, Nearly Met: 34.0%, Met: 27.0%, Exceeded: 4.0%)Richard E. Byrd Middle School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All19%
- Males18%
- Females20%
- Asian43%
- Filipino54%
- Hispanic17%
- White11%
Math students tested: 1,567
Math students with scores: 1,567
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 19% |
California: | 37% |
Standard Not Met:
51.0%Standard Nearly Met:
30.0%Standard Met:
12.0%Standard Exceeded:
7.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2477.7, Students tested: 464, Standard Not Met: 45.0%, Nearly Met: 36.0%, Met: 13.0%, Exceeded: 7.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2484.0, Students tested: 540, Standard Not Met: 49.0%, Nearly Met: 32.0%, Met: 11.0%, Exceeded: 8.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2497.1, Students tested: 563, Standard Not Met: 57.0%, Nearly Met: 24.0%, Met: 12.0%, Exceeded: 7.0%)Richard E. Byrd Middle School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All25%
- Males19%
- Females31%
- Black8%
- Asian59%
- Filipino50%
- Hispanic23%
- White22%
ELA students tested: 1,624
ELA students with scores: 1,592
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 25% |
State: | 44% |
Standard Not Met:
44.0%Standard Nearly Met:
31.0%Standard Met:
21.0%Standard Exceeded:
4.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2469.5, Students tested: 533, Standard Not Met: 44.0%, Nearly Met: 33.0%, Met: 18.0%, Exceeded: 4.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2489.9, Students tested: 579, Standard Not Met: 46.0%, Nearly Met: 30.0%, Met: 21.0%, Exceeded: 2.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2510.0, Students tested: 512, Standard Not Met: 43.0%, Nearly Met: 29.0%, Met: 24.0%, Exceeded: 4.0%)Richard E. Byrd Middle School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All18%
- Males16%
- Females19%
- Black9%
- Asian55%
- Filipino38%
- Hispanic16%
- White11%
Math students tested: 1,638
Math students with scores: 1,577
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 18% |
State: | 34% |
Standard Not Met:
54.0%Standard Nearly Met:
28.0%Standard Met:
12.0%Standard Exceeded:
6.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2472.5, Students tested: 538, Standard Not Met: 48.0%, Nearly Met: 33.0%, Met: 14.0%, Exceeded: 5.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2465.0, Students tested: 585, Standard Not Met: 57.0%, Nearly Met: 29.0%, Met: 10.0%, Exceeded: 5.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2487.5, Students tested: 515, Standard Not Met: 59.0%, Nearly Met: 21.0%, Met: 13.0%, Exceeded: 8.0%)Richard E. Byrd Middle School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
California Alternate Assessments:
(State average from 1,579 schools)
The new California Alternate Assessments (CAAs) are based on alternate achievement standards-called the Core Content Connectors-and linked to the Common Core State Standards. The CAAs are online tests for students with an individualized education program (IEP) that designates the use of an alternate assessment to measure student progress on alternate achievement standards. This alternate assessment is part of the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System and replaces the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) for English language arts and mathematics.
ELA Percentage Level 3
- All5%
- Males8%
- Hispanic7%
ELA students tested: 19
ELA students with scores: 19
Percentage Level 3: | 5% |
California: | 15% |
Level 1:
26.3% The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.Level 2:
68.4% The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts. Level 3:
5.3% The student showed understanding of core concepts.All Grades:
Math students tested: 19
Math students with scores: 19
Percentage Level 3: | 5% |
State: | 6% |
Level 1:
73.7% The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.Level 2:
21.1% The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts. Level 3:
5.3% The student showed understanding of core concepts.All Grades:
ELA Percentage Level 3
- All6%
- Males8%
- Hispanic8%
ELA students tested: 18
ELA students with scores: 18
Percentage Level 3: | 6% |
California: | 11% |
Level 1:
50.0% The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.Level 2:
44.0% The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts. Level 3:
6.0% The student showed understanding of core concepts.All Grades:
Math students tested: 18
Math students with scores: 18
Percentage Level 3: | 6% |
State: | 5% |
Level 1:
78.0% The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.Level 2:
17.0% The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts. Level 3:
6.0% The student showed understanding of core concepts.All Grades:
Paper-based CAASPP:
(State average from 9,784 schools)
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System includes paper-based tests:
California Standards Tests (CSTs) - The CSTs for science in grades five, eight, and ten are administered only to students in California public schools. All questions are multiple-choice. These tests were developed specifically to assess students' knowledge of the California content standards in science.
California Modified Assessment (CMA) - The CMA for science was administered to eligible students in grades five, eight, and ten. The CMA is a standards-based test for students with an individualized education program who meet the eligibility criteria adopted by the State Board of Education. The Elementary and Secondary Education Act called for a range of assessments appropriate to students' abilities. The CMA provides an appropriate assessment for a small percentage of students allowing them to demonstrate their knowledge of skills in the California academic content standards for science.
CST Science students tested: 508
CST Science students with scores: 501
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 47% |
California: | 54% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
12.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
14.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
27.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
26.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
21.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 348.5, Students tested: 508, Far Below Basic: 12.0%, Below Basic: 14.0%, Basic: 27.0%, Proficient: 26.0%, Advanced: 21.0%)12.0%
14.0%
27.0%
26.0%
21.0%
CMA Science students tested: 53
CMA Science students with scores: 53
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 47% |
State: | 38% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
2.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
17.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
34.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
32.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
15.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 345.5, Students tested: 53, Far Below Basic: 2.0%, Below Basic: 17.0%, Basic: 34.0%, Proficient: 32.0%, Advanced: 15.0%) CST Science students tested: 466
CST Science students with scores: 465
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 44% |
California: | 56% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
20.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
16.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
20.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
19.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
25.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 341.1, Students tested: 466, Far Below Basic: 20.0%, Below Basic: 16.0%, Basic: 20.0%, Proficient: 19.0%, Advanced: 25.0%)20.0%
16.0%
20.0%
19.0%
25.0%
CMA Science students tested: 44
CMA Science students with scores: 44
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 41% |
State: | 38% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
9.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
23.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
27.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
34.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
7.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 327.5, Students tested: 44, Far Below Basic: 9.0%, Below Basic: 23.0%, Basic: 27.0%, Proficient: 34.0%, Advanced: 7.0%) CST Science students tested: 485
CST Science students with scores: 483
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 45% |
State: | 60% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
14.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
17.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
24.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
22.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
23.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 342.5, Students tested: 485, Far Below Basic: 14.0%, Below Basic: 17.0%, Basic: 24.0%, Proficient: 22.0%, Advanced: 23.0%)14.0%
17.0%
24.0%
22.0%
23.0%
CMA Science students tested: 58
CMA Science students with scores: 58
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 22% |
California: | 39% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
25.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
19.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
34.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
16.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
7.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 311.7, Students tested: 58, Far Below Basic: 25.0%, Below Basic: 19.0%, Basic: 34.0%, Proficient: 16.0%, Advanced: 7.0%) The Physical Fitness Test:
The Physical Fitness Test (PFT) for students in California schools is the FITNESSGRAM. The main goal of the test is to help students in starting life-long habits of regular physical activity.
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 473, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 30.0%, Needs Improvement: 46.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 23.9%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 473, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 49.9%, Needs Improvement: 20.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 29.2%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 473, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 55.4%, Needs Improvement: 44.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 473, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 81.0%, Needs Improvement: 19.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 473, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 34.9%, Needs Improvement: 65.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 473, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 77.0%, Needs Improvement: 23.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 539, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 43.6%, Needs Improvement: 46.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 10.4%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 539, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 54.5%, Needs Improvement: 19.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 26.0%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 539, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 57.5%, Needs Improvement: 42.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 539, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 75.0%, Needs Improvement: 25.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 539, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 51.8%, Needs Improvement: 48.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 539, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 73.3%, Needs Improvement: 26.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 590, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 42.0%, Needs Improvement: 47.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 10.5%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 590, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 52.0%, Needs Improvement: 18.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 29.4%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 590, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 60.8%, Needs Improvement: 39.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 590, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 75.4%, Needs Improvement: 24.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 590, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 45.8%, Needs Improvement: 54.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 590, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 77.3%, Needs Improvement: 22.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 526, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 27.2%, Needs Improvement: 67.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 5.5%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 526, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 47.1%, Needs Improvement: 22.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 30.8%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 526, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 55.7%, Needs Improvement: 44.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 526, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 82.5%, Needs Improvement: 17.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 526, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 41.4%, Needs Improvement: 58.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 526, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 76.0%, Needs Improvement: 24.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 555, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 31.7%, Needs Improvement: 59.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 9.2%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 555, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 38.2%, Needs Improvement: 12.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 49.7%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 555, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 57.1%, Needs Improvement: 42.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 555, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 83.1%, Needs Improvement: 16.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 555, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 45.2%, Needs Improvement: 54.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 555, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 77.7%, Needs Improvement: 22.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 259, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 42.1%, Needs Improvement: 48.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 9.3%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 259, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 46.3%, Needs Improvement: 14.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 39.0%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 259, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 73.4%, Needs Improvement: 26.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 259, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 76.1%, Needs Improvement: 23.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 259, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 57.5%, Needs Improvement: 42.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 259, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 68.3%, Needs Improvement: 31.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
California English Language Development Test:
(State average from 9,932 schools)
Students in kindergarten through grade twelve whose home language is not English are required by law to take an English skills test. In California, the test is called the California English Language Development Test (CELDT).
Richard E. Byrd Middle School - students who met CELDT criterion (all grades)
All Grades:Student Count: 251
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 87
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 35.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 82
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 26
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 32.0% |
California: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 504.0 |
State: | 532.4 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 492.3 |
California: | 518.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 524.9 |
State: | 518.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 502.7 |
State: | 522.0 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 76
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 27
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 36.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 480.6 |
California: | 547.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 491.5 |
State: | 534.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 475.5 |
State: | 529.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 480.5 |
California: | 530.2 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 93
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 34
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 37.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 523.6 |
State: | 556.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 510.6 |
California: | 547.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 500.9 |
California: | 536.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 502.0 |
California: | 537.0 |
All Grades:Student Count: 295
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 113
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 38.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 94
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 36
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 38.0% |
State: | 41.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 516.6 |
State: | 536.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 512.6 |
California: | 523.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 525.8 |
State: | 520.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 506.1 |
State: | 524.6 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 107
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 42
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 39.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 519.8 |
California: | 550.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 513.5 |
State: | 536.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 531.5 |
State: | 530.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 515.7 |
State: | 532.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 94
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 35
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 37.0% |
State: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 526.9 |
California: | 562.4 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 521.4 |
California: | 552.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 530.8 |
California: | 539.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 506.0 |
California: | 541.2 |
All Grades:Student Count: 283
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 74
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 26.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 102
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 20
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 20.0% |
California: | 38.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 513.7 |
State: | 535.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 494.1 |
State: | 521.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 503.1 |
State: | 519.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 508.0 |
State: | 522.6 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 106
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 39
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 37.0% |
State: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 508.3 |
California: | 551.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 504.9 |
State: | 538.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 542.0 |
State: | 532.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 505.7 |
State: | 532.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 75
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 15
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 20.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 490.8 |
California: | 562.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 488.0 |
State: | 552.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 493.3 |
California: | 543.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 497.9 |
California: | 541.5 |
All Grades:Student Count: 350
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 120
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 34.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 147
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 47
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 32.0% |
California: | 40.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 517.2 |
California: | 538.0 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 501.7 |
California: | 525.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 529.4 |
California: | 522.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 519.0 |
State: | 526.2 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 103
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 38
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 37.0% |
State: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 528.7 |
California: | 549.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 514.6 |
State: | 538.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 538.3 |
State: | 533.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 519.8 |
California: | 535.2 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 100
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 35
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 35.0% |
State: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 509.8 |
California: | 564.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 523.0 |
State: | 554.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 529.2 |
State: | 545.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 519.6 |
California: | 545.9 |
All Grades:Student Count: 360
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 117
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 33.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 124
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 38
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 31.0% |
California: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 515.9 |
California: | 538.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 512.2 |
California: | 525.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 537.7 |
State: | 530.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 521.1 |
California: | 530.3 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 119
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 37
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 31.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 526.6 |
State: | 557.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 508.6 |
California: | 539.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 547.1 |
California: | 543.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 522.9 |
State: | 540.4 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 117
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 42
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 36.0% |
State: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 537.7 |
State: | 570.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 514.2 |
State: | 552.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 553.8 |
State: | 551.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 519.8 |
State: | 548.6 |
All Grades:Student Count: 428
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 172
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 40.0% |
State: | 35.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 149
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 49
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 33.0% |
California: | 44.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 538.2 |
State: | 551.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 498.7 |
California: | 532.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 526.4 |
State: | 532.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 519.6 |
State: | 534.7 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 151
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 60
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 40.0% |
California: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 554.9 |
California: | 566.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 530.5 |
State: | 544.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 546.1 |
State: | 543.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 534.4 |
State: | 545.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 128
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 63
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 49.0% |
California: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 583.5 |
California: | 579.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 538.5 |
California: | 558.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 565.0 |
California: | 553.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 531.9 |
State: | 555.6 |
All Grades:Student Count: 433
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 138
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 32.0% |
State: | 31.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 163
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 42
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 26.0% |
State: | 40.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 531.7 |
California: | 546.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 502.3 |
State: | 529.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 546.8 |
State: | 533.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 514.9 |
California: | 525.3 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 147
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 54
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 37.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 539.8 |
California: | 559.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 524.4 |
State: | 542.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 549.6 |
State: | 548.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 524.9 |
California: | 534.4 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 123
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 42
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 34.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 554.6 |
State: | 570.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 534.1 |
California: | 557.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 584.9 |
State: | 562.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 534.8 |
California: | 544.1 |
Accountability
Adequate Yearly Progress:
(State average from 9,846 schools)
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) - Accountability system mandated by federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Statistics are based on test results of the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program, the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE), and the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA).
Richard E. Byrd Middle School - Adequate Yearly Progress status
ELA Participation RateRichard E. Byrd Middle School: | 99.0% |
State: | 96.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP99
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,438 out of 1,441 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 25 out of 25 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 45 out of 45 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 37 out of 37 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,409 out of 1,411 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 632 out of 637 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 200 out of 200 enrolled)
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White95
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,442 out of 1,446 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 26 out of 26 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 45 out of 45 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- White: 95% (tested 35 out of 37 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,413 out of 1,417 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 643 out of 646 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 198 out of 199 enrolled)
Met all AYP Criteria: Yes
Number of AYP criteria met: 11
Number of AYP criteria possible: 11
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)Attendance rate (calculated by using number of days attended and enrolled) : 98
Met Attendance rate Target: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
ELA Participation RateRichard E. Byrd Middle School: | 97.0% |
California: | 95.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic97
- American Indian100
- Asian96
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White98
- Multirace80
- SED97
- LEP97
- With Disabilities97
- Hispanic: 97% (tested 1,467 out of 1,509 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 96% (tested 24 out of 25 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 54 out of 54 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 14 out of 14 enrolled)
- White: 98% (tested 40 out of 41 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 80% (tested 4 out of 5 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 97% (tested 1,493 out of 1,532 enrolled)
- English Learners: 97% (tested 539 out of 556 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 97% (tested 237 out of 245 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic23
- Asian58
- Filipino57
- Black9
- White24
- SED24
- LEP5
- With Disabilities1
- Hispanic: 23% (330 out of 1,421 valid scores)
- Asian: 58% (14 out of 24 valid scores)
- Filipino: 57% (28 out of 49 valid scores)
- Black: 9% (1 out of 11 valid scores)
- White: 24% (8 out of 34 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 24% (349 out of 1,455 valid scores)
- English Learners: 5% (23 out of 509 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 1% (3 out of 220 valid scores)
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic96
- American Indian100
- Asian96
- Filipino97
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White96
- Multirace80
- SED96
- LEP95
- With Disabilities94
- Hispanic: 96% (tested 1,460 out of 1,525 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 96% (tested 24 out of 25 enrolled)
- Filipino: 97% (tested 52 out of 54 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 13 out of 13 enrolled)
- White: 96% (tested 41 out of 43 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 80% (tested 4 out of 5 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 96% (tested 1,481 out of 1,544 enrolled)
- English Learners: 95% (tested 548 out of 574 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 94% (tested 230 out of 245 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveRichard E. Byrd Middle School: | 17.8% |
State: | 33.3% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic16
- Asian50
- Filipino47
- White12
- SED17
- LEP4
- With Disabilities2
- Hispanic: 16% (229 out of 1,400 valid scores)
- Asian: 50% (12 out of 24 valid scores)
- Filipino: 47% (22 out of 47 valid scores)
- White: 12% (4 out of 33 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 17% (242 out of 1,430 valid scores)
- English Learners: 4% (18 out of 503 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 2% (4 out of 215 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 10
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 89.2%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,544 out of 1,544 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 33 out of 33 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 48 out of 48 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 15 out of 15 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 31 out of 31 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,675 out of 1,675 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 447 out of 447 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 256 out of 256 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveRichard E. Byrd Middle School: | 43.3% |
California: | 55.7% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic42
- Asian58
- Filipino70
- Black31
- White48
- SED43
- LEP16
- With Disabilities28
- Hispanic: 42% (624 out of 1,478 valid scores)
- Asian: 58% (14 out of 24 valid scores)
- Filipino: 70% (30 out of 43 valid scores)
- Black: 31% (4 out of 13 valid scores)
- White: 48% (14 out of 29 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 43% (689 out of 1,590 valid scores)
- English Learners: 16% (69 out of 421 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 28% (67 out of 243 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 89.5%
Math Participation RateRichard E. Byrd Middle School: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.2% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,542 out of 1,544 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 33 out of 33 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 48 out of 48 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 15 out of 15 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 31 out of 31 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,673 out of 1,675 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 446 out of 447 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 256 out of 256 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 44.7% |
California: | 59.6% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic44
- Asian67
- Filipino74
- Black15
- White55
- SED45
- LEP19
- With Disabilities28
- Hispanic: 44% (642 out of 1,477 valid scores)
- Asian: 67% (16 out of 24 valid scores)
- Filipino: 74% (32 out of 43 valid scores)
- Black: 15% (2 out of 13 valid scores)
- White: 55% (16 out of 29 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 45% (710 out of 1,589 valid scores)
- English Learners: 19% (78 out of 421 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 28% (67 out of 243 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 20
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 78.4%
ELA Participation RateRichard E. Byrd Middle School: | 100.0% |
State: | 98.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,580 out of 1,583 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 23 out of 23 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 50 out of 50 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 13 out of 13 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 31 out of 31 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,701 out of 1,704 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 833 out of 835 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 260 out of 261 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 46.1% |
California: | 57.4% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic45
- Asian58
- Filipino74
- Black33
- White48
- SED46
- LEP30
- With Disabilities27
- Hispanic: 45% (674 out of 1,495 valid scores)
- Asian: 58% (11 out of 19 valid scores)
- Filipino: 74% (37 out of 50 valid scores)
- Black: 33% (4 out of 12 valid scores)
- White: 48% (14 out of 29 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 46% (742 out of 1,609 valid scores)
- English Learners: 30% (237 out of 797 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 27% (66 out of 249 valid scores)
Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 79%
Math Participation RateHere: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.1% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,579 out of 1,583 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 23 out of 23 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 50 out of 50 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 13 out of 13 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 31 out of 31 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,700 out of 1,704 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 833 out of 835 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 259 out of 261 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveRichard E. Byrd Middle School: | 46.1% |
California: | 59.9% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic45
- Asian63
- Filipino76
- Black33
- White62
- SED46
- LEP36
- With Disabilities25
- Hispanic: 45% (669 out of 1,495 valid scores)
- Asian: 63% (12 out of 19 valid scores)
- Filipino: 76% (38 out of 50 valid scores)
- Black: 33% (4 out of 12 valid scores)
- White: 62% (18 out of 29 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 46% (742 out of 1,609 valid scores)
- English Learners: 36% (286 out of 797 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 25% (63 out of 248 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 14
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 67.6%
ELA Participation RateRichard E. Byrd Middle School: | 100.0% |
State: | 98.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black87
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,582 out of 1,583 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 29 out of 29 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 57 out of 57 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Black: 87% (tested 13 out of 15 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 44 out of 44 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,610 out of 1,610 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 921 out of 921 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 235 out of 238 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 41.3% |
California: | 55.9% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic40
- Asian50
- Filipino65
- Black27
- White56
- SED40
- LEP26
- With Disabilities12
- Hispanic: 40% (605 out of 1,508 valid scores)
- Asian: 50% (13 out of 26 valid scores)
- Filipino: 65% (34 out of 52 valid scores)
- Black: 27% (3 out of 11 valid scores)
- White: 56% (23 out of 41 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 40% (620 out of 1,538 valid scores)
- English Learners: 26% (226 out of 884 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 12% (26 out of 221 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 68.5%
Math Participation RateRichard E. Byrd Middle School: | 100.0% |
State: | 98.0% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black87
- White98
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,582 out of 1,583 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 29 out of 29 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 57 out of 57 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Black: 87% (tested 13 out of 15 enrolled)
- White: 98% (tested 43 out of 44 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,609 out of 1,610 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 921 out of 921 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 235 out of 238 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveRichard E. Byrd Middle School: | 38.2% |
California: | 59.3% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic37
- Asian62
- Filipino69
- Black27
- White54
- SED37
- LEP26
- With Disabilities13
- Hispanic: 37% (551 out of 1,508 valid scores)
- Asian: 62% (16 out of 26 valid scores)
- Filipino: 69% (36 out of 52 valid scores)
- Black: 27% (3 out of 11 valid scores)
- White: 54% (22 out of 41 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 37% (566 out of 1,538 valid scores)
- English Learners: 26% (229 out of 884 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 13% (28 out of 221 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 14
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 56.8%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,597 out of 1,600 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 8 out of 8 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 27 out of 27 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 56 out of 56 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 16 out of 16 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 45 out of 45 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,599 out of 1,602 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 1,024 out of 1,026 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 216 out of 219 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic35
- Asian56
- Filipino56
- Black23
- White45
- SED35
- LEP22
- With Disabilities8
- Hispanic: 35% (521 out of 1,507 valid scores)
- Asian: 56% (14 out of 25 valid scores)
- Filipino: 56% (30 out of 54 valid scores)
- Black: 23% (3 out of 13 valid scores)
- White: 45% (18 out of 40 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 35% (531 out of 1,518 valid scores)
- English Learners: 22% (213 out of 972 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 8% (17 out of 205 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 58%
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White98
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,598 out of 1,600 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 8 out of 8 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 27 out of 27 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 56 out of 56 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 16 out of 16 enrolled)
- White: 98% (tested 44 out of 45 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,600 out of 1,602 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 1,023 out of 1,026 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 217 out of 219 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveRichard E. Byrd Middle School: | 39.0% |
State: | 57.1% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic38
- Asian52
- Filipino61
- Black39
- White40
- SED39
- LEP28
- With Disabilities12
- Hispanic: 38% (575 out of 1,508 valid scores)
- Asian: 52% (13 out of 25 valid scores)
- Filipino: 61% (33 out of 54 valid scores)
- Black: 39% (5 out of 13 valid scores)
- White: 40% (16 out of 40 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 39% (589 out of 1,519 valid scores)
- English Learners: 28% (275 out of 972 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 12% (25 out of 207 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 11
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 46%
ELA Participation RateRichard E. Byrd Middle School: | 100.0% |
State: | 98.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,578 out of 1,583 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 26 out of 26 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 49 out of 49 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 27 out of 27 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 51 out of 51 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,577 out of 1,581 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 1,110 out of 1,114 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 211 out of 212 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 32.3% |
California: | 52.4% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic31
- Asian48
- Filipino47
- Black29
- White45
- SED31
- LEP23
- With Disabilities10
- Hispanic: 31% (459 out of 1,466 valid scores)
- Asian: 48% (12 out of 25 valid scores)
- Filipino: 47% (23 out of 49 valid scores)
- Black: 29% (5 out of 17 valid scores)
- White: 45% (21 out of 47 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 31% (462 out of 1,471 valid scores)
- English Learners: 23% (232 out of 1,032 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 10% (20 out of 197 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 47.5%
Math Participation RateRichard E. Byrd Middle School: | 100.0% |
State: | 98.2% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,578 out of 1,583 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 26 out of 26 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 49 out of 49 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 27 out of 27 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 51 out of 51 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,578 out of 1,581 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 1,110 out of 1,114 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 211 out of 212 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic32
- Asian52
- Filipino43
- Black24
- White45
- SED33
- LEP26
- With Disabilities15
- Hispanic: 32% (465 out of 1,467 valid scores)
- Asian: 52% (13 out of 25 valid scores)
- Filipino: 43% (21 out of 49 valid scores)
- Black: 24% (4 out of 17 valid scores)
- White: 45% (21 out of 47 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 33% (482 out of 1,472 valid scores)
- English Learners: 26% (265 out of 1,033 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 15% (30 out of 197 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 11
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 35.2%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,562 out of 1,564 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 26 out of 26 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 52 out of 52 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 14 out of 14 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 56 out of 56 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,492 out of 1,494 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 1,157 out of 1,158 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 241 out of 242 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 30.6% |
California: | 48.6% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic30
- Asian38
- Filipino46
- Black23
- White43
- SED30
- LEP23
- With Disabilities12
- Hispanic: 30% (431 out of 1,455 valid scores)
- Asian: 38% (8 out of 21 valid scores)
- Filipino: 46% (23 out of 50 valid scores)
- Black: 23% (3 out of 13 valid scores)
- White: 43% (21 out of 49 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 30% (409 out of 1,388 valid scores)
- English Learners: 23% (248 out of 1,089 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 12% (27 out of 225 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 37%
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,560 out of 1,564 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 26 out of 26 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 52 out of 52 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 14 out of 14 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 56 out of 56 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,490 out of 1,494 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 1,155 out of 1,158 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 241 out of 242 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveRichard E. Byrd Middle School: | 32.6% |
California: | 52.3% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic32
- Asian62
- Filipino54
- Black8
- White41
- SED32
- LEP28
- With Disabilities13
- Hispanic: 32% (458 out of 1,453 valid scores)
- Asian: 62% (13 out of 21 valid scores)
- Filipino: 54% (27 out of 50 valid scores)
- Black: 8% (1 out of 13 valid scores)
- White: 41% (20 out of 49 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 32% (444 out of 1,386 valid scores)
- English Learners: 28% (305 out of 1,088 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 13% (30 out of 225 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 17
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino99
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,586 out of 1,588 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 34 out of 34 enrolled)
- Filipino: 99% (tested 51 out of 52 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 24 out of 24 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 68 out of 68 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,557 out of 1,560 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 1,177 out of 1,180 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 244 out of 245 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveRichard E. Byrd Middle School: | 25.6% |
California: | 46.4% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic24
- Asian38
- Filipino45
- Black26
- White35
- SED24
- LEP17
- With Disabilities10
- Hispanic: 24% (348 out of 1,437 valid scores)
- Asian: 38% (11 out of 29 valid scores)
- Filipino: 45% (22 out of 49 valid scores)
- Black: 26% (5 out of 19 valid scores)
- White: 35% (23 out of 66 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 24% (343 out of 1,411 valid scores)
- English Learners: 17% (180 out of 1,084 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 10% (23 out of 222 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation RateRichard E. Byrd Middle School: | 99.0% |
State: | 97.9% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian86
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED99
- LEP99
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 1,579 out of 1,588 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 86% (tested 6 out of 7 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 34 out of 34 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 52 out of 52 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 24 out of 24 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 68 out of 68 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 1,551 out of 1,560 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 1,172 out of 1,180 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 242 out of 245 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveRichard E. Byrd Middle School: | 27.8% |
California: | 50.5% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic26
- Asian48
- Filipino54
- Black21
- White32
- SED28
- LEP23
- With Disabilities15
- Hispanic: 26% (378 out of 1,431 valid scores)
- Asian: 48% (14 out of 29 valid scores)
- Filipino: 54% (27 out of 50 valid scores)
- Black: 21% (4 out of 19 valid scores)
- White: 32% (21 out of 66 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 28% (388 out of 1,407 valid scores)
- English Learners: 23% (244 out of 1,080 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 15% (32 out of 220 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 17
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation RateHere: | 100.0% |
California: | 97.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,621 out of 1,627 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 29 out of 29 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 58 out of 58 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 21 out of 21 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 74 out of 74 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,497 out of 1,503 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 1,219 out of 1,225 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 229 out of 231 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveRichard E. Byrd Middle School: | 28.3% |
State: | 45.9% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic26
- Asian44
- Filipino56
- Black35
- White43
- SED27
- LEP21
- With Disabilities14
- Hispanic: 26% (369 out of 1,419 valid scores)
- Asian: 44% (12 out of 27 valid scores)
- Filipino: 56% (31 out of 55 valid scores)
- Black: 35% (7 out of 20 valid scores)
- White: 43% (29 out of 67 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 27% (357 out of 1,324 valid scores)
- English Learners: 21% (227 out of 1,101 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 14% (28 out of 203 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation RateRichard E. Byrd Middle School: | 100.0% |
State: | 97.5% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 1,618 out of 1,627 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 29 out of 29 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 58 out of 58 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 21 out of 21 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 74 out of 74 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,496 out of 1,503 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 1,220 out of 1,225 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 228 out of 231 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 31.0% |
California: | 49.9% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Asian44
- Filipino51
- Black25
- White40
- SED31
- LEP26
- With Disabilities14
- Asian: 44% (12 out of 27 valid scores)
- Filipino: 51% (28 out of 55 valid scores)
- Black: 25% (5 out of 20 valid scores)
- White: 40% (27 out of 67 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 31% (404 out of 1,323 valid scores)
- English Learners: 26% (287 out of 1,101 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 14% (28 out of 202 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 18
Number of AYP criteria possible: 23
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White99
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,684 out of 1,689 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 35 out of 35 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 53 out of 53 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 27 out of 27 enrolled)
- White: 99% (tested 99 out of 100 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,606 out of 1,611 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 1,321 out of 1,323 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 267 out of 268 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic24
- Asian58
- Filipino52
- Black27
- White42
- SED26
- LEP20
- With Disabilities12
- Hispanic: 24% (363 out of 1,506 valid scores)
- Asian: 58% (18 out of 31 valid scores)
- Filipino: 52% (26 out of 50 valid scores)
- Black: 27% (7 out of 26 valid scores)
- White: 42% (37 out of 88 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 26% (372 out of 1,442 valid scores)
- English Learners: 20% (243 out of 1,201 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 12% (28 out of 235 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation RateSchool: | 100.0% |
California: | 99.2% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White99
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,680 out of 1,688 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 35 out of 35 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 53 out of 53 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 27 out of 27 enrolled)
- White: 99% (tested 99 out of 100 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,605 out of 1,611 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 1,318 out of 1,323 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 267 out of 268 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveRichard E. Byrd Middle School: | 29.0% |
California: | 49.3% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic28
- Asian61
- Filipino50
- Black27
- White26
- SED29
- LEP24
- With Disabilities11
- Hispanic: 28% (416 out of 1,504 valid scores)
- Asian: 61% (19 out of 31 valid scores)
- Filipino: 50% (25 out of 50 valid scores)
- Black: 27% (7 out of 26 valid scores)
- White: 26% (23 out of 88 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 29% (418 out of 1,441 valid scores)
- English Learners: 24% (293 out of 1,199 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 11% (26 out of 235 valid scores)
Health & Safety
Referrals and Arrests:
(State average from 2,295 schools)
Referral to law enforcement is an action by which a student is reported to any law enforcement agency or official, including a school police unit, for an incident that occurs on school grounds, during school-related events, or while taking school transportation, regardless of whether official action is taken. Citations, tickets, court referrals, and school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.
School-related arrest refers to an arrest of a student for any activity conducted on school grounds, during off-campus school activities (including while taking school transportation), or due to a referral by any school official. All school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.
Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Asian: 2 (all male)
Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official per 1,000 students
Students with disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- White: 2 (all male)
Students with disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official per 1,000 students
Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official
- Hispanic4
- American Indian2
- White2
- LEP5
Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official: 8 (male: 6, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
- White: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 5 (all male)
Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official per 1,000 students
Students without disabilities who received a school-related arrest: 2 (all female)
Students without disabilities who received a school-related arrest per 1,000 students
Students with disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official: 5 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Students with disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official per 1,000 students
Students with disabilities who received a school-related arrest: 2 (all male)
Students with disabilities who received a school-related arrest per 1,000 students
Harassment & Bullying:
(State average from 2,337 schools)
An allegation is a claim or assertion that someone has done something wrong or illegal, typically made without proof.
Harassment or bullying on the basis of sex includes sexual harassment or bullying and gender-based harassment or bullying. Sexual harassment or bullying is unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature, such as unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal, nonverbal, or physical conduct of a sexual nature. Gender-based harassment or bullying is nonsexual intimidation or abusive behavior toward a student based on the student's actual or perceived sex, including harassment based on gender identity, gender expression, and nonconformity with gender stereotypes. Harassing conduct may take many forms, including verbal acts and name-calling, as well as non-verbal behavior, such as graphic and written statements, or conduct that is physically threatening, harmful or humiliating. The conduct can be carried out by school employees, other students, and non-employee third parties. Both male and female students can be victims of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex, and the harasser or bully and the victim can be of the same sex. Bullying on the basis of sex constitutes sexual harassment.
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex: 1
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex per 1,000 students
Students reported as harassed or bullied on the basis of sex: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Students disciplined for bullying or harassment on the basis of sex: 2 (all male)
Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
(State average from 8,737 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.
Chronic Student Absenteeism
- Hispanic112
- Asian4
- Native Hawaiian4
- Black2
- White10
- Multirace2
- LEP19
- IDEA19
- 5044
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 134 (male: 70, female: 64)
- Hispanic: 112 (male: 59, female: 53)
- Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Black: 2 (all male)
- White: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
- Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 19 (male: 14, female: 5)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 19 (male: 14, female: 5)
- Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Chronic Student Absenteeism
- Hispanic175
- American Indian2
- Asian7
- Native Hawaiian4
- Black4
- White4
- LEP49
- IDEA46
- 5044
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 196 (male: 120, female: 76)
- Hispanic: 175 (male: 107, female: 68)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
- Asian: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 49 (male: 35, female: 14)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 46 (male: 35, female: 11)
- Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 studentsSchool: | 122.3 |
California: | 178.2 |
Suspensions:
(State average from 1,406 schools)
Out-of-school suspension - For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
- For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision. School days missed due to out-of-school suspension
- Hispanic20
- White2
- Multirace1
- IDEA9
- 5041
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 23 (male: 14, female: 9)
- Hispanic: 20 (male: 12, female: 8)
- White: 2 (all male)
- Two or More Races: 1 (all female)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 9 (male: 7, female: 2)
- Section 504: 1 (all male)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 12
Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)School: | 7.5 |
California: | 84.8 |
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 9 (male: 5, female: 4)
- Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all female)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students with disabilities): 6
Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students with disabilities)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Section 504 only): 1
Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Section 504 only)Richard E. Byrd Middle School: | 0.6 |
California: | 3.4 |
Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- White: 2 (all male)
- Section 504: 2 (all male)
Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 9 (male: 7, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension
- Hispanic4
- American Indian2
- Black2
- White2
- LEP2
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 10 (male: 6, female: 4)
- Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
- Black: 2 (all female)
- White: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Section 504: 2 (all male)
Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Expulsions:
(State average from 1,805 schools)
Expulsion with educational services refers to an action taken by the local educational agency of removing a child from his/her regular school for disciplinary purposes, and providing educational services to the child (e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring; transfer to an alternative school) for the remainder of the school year (or longer) in accordance with local educational agency policy. Expulsion with educational services also includes removals resulting from violations of the Gun Free Schools Act that are modified to less than 365 days.
Students without Disabilities who received an expulsion with educational services: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 2 (all female)
- White: 2 (all male)
Students without Disabilities who received an expulsion with educational services per 1,000 studentsRichard E. Byrd Middle School: | 2.5 |
California: | 11.3 |
Classes & Courses
Algebra I:
(State average from 1,382 schools)
Algebra I is a (college-preparatory) course that includes the study of properties and operations of the real number system; evaluating rational algebraic expressions; solving and graphing first degree equations and inequalities; translating word problems into equations; operations with and factoring of polynomials; and solving simple quadratic equations. Algebra I is a foundation course leading to higher-level mathematics courses, including Geometry and Algebra II.
8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I: 61 (male: 28, female: 33)
- Hispanic: 55 (male: 26, female: 29)
- Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Black: 2 (all female)
8th grade studenst who passed Algebra I: 56 (male: 25, female: 31)
- Hispanic: 56 (male: 25, female: 31)
Percent of 8th grade students who passed
Number of Algebra I classes: 9
7-8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I
- Hispanic307
- American Indian2
- Asian19
- Native Hawaiian2
- Black2
- White7
- Multirace2
- LEP4
- IDEA13
7-8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I: 341 (male: 163, female: 178)
- Hispanic: 307 (male: 149, female: 158)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all female)
- Asian: 19 (male: 8, female: 11)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 2 (all female)
- Black: 2 (all male)
- White: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
- Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 13 (male: 11, female: 2)
7-8th grade studenst who passed Algebra I
- Hispanic242
- Asian17
- LEP4
- IDEA11
7-8th grade studenst who passed Algebra I: 259 (male: 119, female: 140)
- Hispanic: 242 (male: 112, female: 130)
- Asian: 17 (male: 7, female: 10)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (all female)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 11 (male: 7, female: 4)
Percent of 7-8th grade students who passedRichard E. Byrd Middle School: | 76.0% |
State: | 83.6% |
Number of Algebra I classes: 9
Geometry:
Geometry is a (college-preparatory) course that typically includes topics such as properties of plane and solid figures; deductive methods of reasoning and use of logic; geometry as an axiomatic system including the study of postulates, theorems, and formal proofs; concepts of congruence, similarity, parallelism, perpendicularity, and proportion; and rules of angle measurement in triangles.Geometry is considered a prerequisite for Algebra II.
Number of Geometry classes: 3
Student Enrollment in Geometry
- Hispanic88
- Asian10
- White4
- IDEA2
Student Enrollment in Geometry: 102 (male: 51, female: 51)
- Hispanic: 88 (male: 44, female: 44)
- Asian: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
- White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
Comments
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: