Sid Nelson Community Learning School in Cantonment, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 8.

648 MUSCOGEE RD
Cantonment, FL 32533

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
T. R. Jackson Prek Center School (17.0 miles):

96
Pleasant Grove Elementary School (17.1 miles):

74
Milton High School (17.1 miles):

55
Beulah Academy Of Science School (6.0 miles):

48
Warrington Elementary School (15.4 miles):

41
Bagdad Elementary School (17.8 miles):

31
Ferry Pass Middle School (10.3 miles):

17
Sid Nelson Community Learning School:

8
Pace Center For Girls School (12.0 miles):

0
Sid Nelson Community Learning School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Escambia County:

41
Cantonment:

35
Sid Nelson Community Learning:

8

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (850) 937-2280 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 17
School number: 791
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: ESCAMBIA
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (850) 937-2284
Principal: Patrice Moody
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 1
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 1
Senate District: 2

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

50%
State average from 59 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

58%
State average from 59 schools:

78%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

86%
State average from 59 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

27%
State average from 59 schools:

54%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

56%
State average from 59 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 59 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

50%
State average from 59 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

63%
State average from 59 schools:

69%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

459
State average from 59 schools:

560
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 59 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

68%
State average from 59 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

54%
State average from 59 schools:

46%
Region: 4

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 490 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 491 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 177
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 439
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 425

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 439
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 425
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 228 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 228 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 81
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 217
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 212

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 217
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 212
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 74 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 177 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 177 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 64
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 146
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 139

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 146
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 139
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 344 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 345 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 118
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 299
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 291

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 299
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 291
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

46%
State average from 58 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

48%
State average from 58 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

96%
State average from 58 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

30%
State average from 58 schools:

50%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 58 schools:

69%
Making Math Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 58 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

68%
State average from 58 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

64%
State average from 58 schools:

68%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

478
State average from 58 schools:

564
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 59 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

65%
State average from 59 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

54%
State average from 59 schools:

46%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 490 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 489 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 178
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 458
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 450

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 457
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 447
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 233 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 232 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 86
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 224
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 218

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 224
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 218
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 78 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 79 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 70
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 164 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 164 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 51
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 148
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 146

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 148
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 145
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 325 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 324 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 109
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 299
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 292

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 298
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 289
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 72 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 72 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 78

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 77
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

41%
State average from 59 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

51%
State average from 59 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 59 schools:

83%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

25%
State average from 59 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

49%
State average from 59 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

65%
State average from 59 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

55%
State average from 59 schools:

60%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

63%
State average from 59 schools:

68%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

452
State average from 59 schools:

541
Percent Tested
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

99%
State average from 59 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

64%
State average from 59 schools:

47%
Minority Rate
Here:

55%
State average from 59 schools:

46%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 499 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 497 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 160
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 457
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 442

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 454
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 439
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 223 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 221 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 82
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 213
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 206

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 211
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 204
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 85 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 85 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 183 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 183 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 152
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 147

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 151
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 146
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 341 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 340 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 111
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 308
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 300

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 306
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 298
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 75 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 75 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 62
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 62
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 101 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 101 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 93

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 93
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22 (86%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29 (88%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 27
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 25
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28 (88%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1410
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

29%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

73%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

1646
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

24%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

39%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

73%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

20
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1702
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

8%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

34%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

72%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

11
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

1657
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

22%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

19%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

56%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1791
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

12%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

42%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

22%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

5%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

69%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1811
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

294
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

23%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

40%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

37%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1851
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

38%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

25%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

6%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

33%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

10
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1825
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

43%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

48%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

27%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

9%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

24%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

57%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

9
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

43%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

37%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

19%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

2%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

21%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

7
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

51%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

21%
State average:

30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

21%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1473
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

25%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

16%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

76%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1592
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

24%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

13%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

76%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

1646
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

328
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

17%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

7%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

53%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1616
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

297
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

35%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

45%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

1776
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

25%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

18%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

57%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1826
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

25%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

27%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

37%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

49%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1887
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

23%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

48%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1939
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

76%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

26%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

59%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1462
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

1616
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1648
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1649
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1705
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1798
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1834
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

296
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1797
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1490
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

341
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1531
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1613
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1612
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1676
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1832
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1873
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1925
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 99
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 47%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 81%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 101
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 90
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 88%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1379
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1529
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1569
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1512
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1663
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1786
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1770
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1771
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

273
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1446
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1509
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1637
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

326
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1510
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

272
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1718
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1800
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1881
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1923
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

308
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

89
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

632
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

61
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

96
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

649
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

66
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

99
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

664
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

70
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

114
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

652
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

44
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

99
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

668
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

55
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

95
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

672
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

49
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

105
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

675
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

43
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

4
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

88
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

687
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

45
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
SID NELSON COMMUNITY LEARNING:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 95
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

292
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 55%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 93
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

276
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 40%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 86
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

282
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 42%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 76%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.