Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Tom Bean Middle School in Tom Bean, TX
(06-08 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 70
Address
 289 FRANKLIN RD
Tom Bean, TX 75489
Telephone
(903) 546-6161
(make sure to verify first before calling)
City-data.com school rating
70
Students
158
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
13.8
Free lunch eligible students
55
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
23
School district
TOM BEAN ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide eligible school-No program
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
WHITEWRIGHT EL (6.0 miles):

85
WHITEWRIGHT MIDDLE (6.0 miles):

76
WHITEWRIGHT H S (6.1 miles):

70
Tom Bean Middle School:

70
HOWE H S (6.5 miles):

68
HOWE EL (7.2 miles):

58
TOM BEAN H S (0.1 miles):

53
TOM BEAN EL (1.1 miles):

53
HOWE MIDDLE (7.1 miles):

48
Tom Bean Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Grayson County:

59
Tom Bean:

59
Tom Bean Middle School:

70

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 158
Enrollment in 2015: 155
Enrollment in 2014: 174
Enrollment in 2013: 177
Enrollment in 2012: 165
Enrollment in 2011: 180
Enrollment in 2010: 190
Enrollment in 2009: 211
Enrollment in 2008: 202
Enrollment in 2007: 190
Enrollment in 2006: 192
Enrollment in 2005: 209
Enrollment in 2004: 224
Enrollment in 2003: 213
Enrollment in 2002: 228
Enrollment in 2001: 214
Enrollment in 2000: 202
Enrollment in 1999: 194

Tom Bean Middle School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradeG06G07G08Total
All students605147158
Female students27332787
Male students33182071
Asian students11 - 2
Hispanic students3148
Black students1 - 12
White students534642141
Two or More Races students23 - 5

Enrollment by grade:
6th grade enrollment: 60
7th grade enrollment: 51
8th grade enrollment: 47

Tom Bean Middle School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 87 (55.1%)
School:

55.1%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 71 (44.9%)
School:

44.9%
State:

50.1%

Tom Bean Middle School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Asian enrollment: 2 (1.3%)
Tom Bean Middle School:

1.3%
State:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 8 (5.1%)
Here:

5.1%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 2 (1.3%)
Here:

1.3%
State:

11.6%
White enrollment: 141 (89.2%)
Here:

89.2%
State:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 5 (3.2%)
School:

3.2%
State:

2.1%

Tom Bean Middle School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 78 (49.4%)
School:

49.4%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 55 (34.8%)
Here:

34.8%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 23 (14.6%)
Tom Bean Middle School:

14.6%
State:

6.2%

Tom Bean Middle School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 13.8

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 2
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 1
Number of FTE nurses: 0.5

Student/Teacher Ratio
School:

11.5
State:

15.6

Tom Bean Middle School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $1,675,234
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 13 (Salary Expenditures: $1,675,234)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $59,500)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $19,000)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $67,000)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $42,000
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $16,752,234
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $1,756,432
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $78,500)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $19,000)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $67,000)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $54,500

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 26 (male: 16, female: 10)
  • White: 26 (male: 16, female: 10)

Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 9 (male: 4, female: 5)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • White: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)

Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)

This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • White: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Here:

44.3
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 3,349 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
6th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,594
  • Males1,591
  • Females1,596
  • White1,596
Math Average Scale Score:

1,594
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 63
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 64

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.3 (53%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.6 (50%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 2.4 (40%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.9 (42%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 41%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 5%

27%
41%
27%
5%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,591, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 3%)
27%
43%
27%
3%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,596, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 7%)
27%
40%
26%
7%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,596, Tested: 59, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 5%)
25%
43%
27%
5%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (6th Grade)

  • All1,563
  • Males1,538
  • Females1,591
  • White1,562
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,563
State:

1,457
Reading students tested: 63
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 64

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.8 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.7 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.7 (58%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 17%

37%
26%
20%
17%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,538, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 12%)
42%
34%
12%
12%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,591, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 23%)
30%
20%
27%
23%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,562, Tested: 59, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 17%)
36%
27%
20%
17%

7th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,596
  • Males1,579
  • Females1,610
  • White1,588
Math Average Scale Score:

1,596
Texas:

1,571
Math students tested: 37
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 56

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.4 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.2 (41%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.8 (40%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3 (43%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 46%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 40%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 9%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 5%

46%
40%
9%
5%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,579, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 53%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 6%, Masters: 6%)
53%
35%
6%
6%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,610, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 45%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 5%)
40%
45%
10%
5%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,588, Tested: 31, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 52%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 3%)
52%
35%
10%
3%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All1,627
  • Males1,575
  • Females1,667
  • Hispanic1,671
  • White1,627
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,627
State:

1,550
Reading students tested: 56
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 56

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.1 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.3 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.5 (60%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 39%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 14%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 20%

39%
27%
14%
20%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,575, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 58%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 13%)
58%
21%
8%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,667, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 25%)
25%
31%
19%
25%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,671, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 17%)
17%
33%
33%
17%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,627, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 21%)
40%
27%
12%
21%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (7th Grade)

  • All3,716
  • Males3,549
  • Females3,842
  • Hispanic3,755
  • White3,730
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,716
Texas:

3,515
Writing students tested: 56
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 56

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.8 (48%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.5 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.2 (66%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 5%

36%
32%
27%
5%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,549, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 4%)
50%
29%
17%
4%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,842, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 6%)
25%
34%
35%
6%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,755, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 66%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 0%)
17%
66%
17%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,730, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 6%)
38%
28%
29%
6%

8th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,731
  • Males1,704
  • Females1,759
  • White1,730
Math Average Scale Score:

1,731
State:

1,539
Math students tested: 59
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 73

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.2 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.5 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.2 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.9 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 44%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 17%

12%
27%
44%
17%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,704, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 10%)
17%
33%
40%
10%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,759, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 48%, Masters: 24%)
7%
21%
48%
24%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,730, Tested: 53, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 19%)
13%
29%
39%
19%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All1,692
  • Males1,652
  • Females1,736
  • White1,690
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,692
Texas:

1,561
Reading students tested: 54
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 73

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.9 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.9 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.5 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 32%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 22%

17%
29%
32%
22%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,652, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 11%)
25%
25%
39%
11%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,736, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 35%)
8%
34%
23%
35%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,690, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 23%)
17%
31%
29%
23%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All4,064
  • Males3,877
  • Females4,265
  • White4,074
Science Average Scale Score:

4,064
State:

3,634
Science students tested: 54
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 54

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.4 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.1 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.7 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 7.6 (69%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 30%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 13%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 35%

22%
30%
13%
35%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,877, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 29%)
25%
36%
10%
29%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,265, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 42%)
19%
23%
16%
42%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,074, Tested: 48, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 35%)
25%
27%
13%
35%

    Social Studies Average Scale Score
    (8th Grade)

  • All3,896
  • Males3,774
  • Females4,034
  • White3,883
Social Studies Average Scale Score:

3,896
State:

3,461
Social Studies students tested: 53
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Social Studies # Answer Documents Submitted: 54

Social Studies Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 10.8 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.8 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.4 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 4.2 (61%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 15%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 28%

25%
32%
15%
28%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,774, Tested: 28, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 21%)
21%
40%
18%
21%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,034, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 36%)
28%
24%
12%
36%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,883, Tested: 47, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 30%)
28%
27%
15%
30%

Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic2
  • White46
  • Multirace2
  • IDEA8
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 50 (male: 27, female: 23)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • White: 46 (male: 23, female: 23)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 8 (all male)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Here:

316.5
State:

147.9

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)

In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 32 (male: 27, female: 5)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • White: 25 (male: 20, female: 5)
  • Two or More Races: 5 (all male)

Classes & Courses


Algebra I:
Show data for

(State average from 1,291 schools)

Algebra I is a (college-preparatory) course that includes the study of properties and operations of the real number system; evaluating rational algebraic expressions; solving and graphing first degree equations and inequalities; translating word problems into equations; operations with and factoring of polynomials; and solving simple quadratic equations. Algebra I is a foundation course leading to higher-level mathematics courses, including Geometry and Algebra II.
8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
8th grade studenst who passed Algebra I: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
  • White: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
Percent of 8th grade students who passed
Tom Bean Middle School:

100.0%
Texas:

87.0%

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Tom Bean, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2021 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents