Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Ulze Elementary School in Irving, TX
(KG-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 56
Address
 1200 S IRVING HTS DR
Irving, TX 75060
Telephone
(972) 600-3500
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.irvingisd.net
City-data.com school rating
56
Students
718
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
44.0
Free lunch eligible students
582
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
52
School district
IRVING ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
Ulze Elementary School:

56
GABE P ALLEN CHARTER SCHOOL (1.6 miles):

45
GOOD EL (1.6 miles):

44
ELADIO R MARTINEZ LEARNING CENTER (2.0 miles):

41
BOWIE MIDDLE (1.0 miles):

30
AUSTIN MIDDLE (1.7 miles):

30
NIMITZ H S (1.4 miles):

27
BRITAIN EL (0.9 miles):

18
BARBARA CARDWELL CAREER PREPARATORY CENTER (1.9 miles):

12
Ulze Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Dallas County:

53
Irving:

48
Ulze Elementary School:

56

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 718
Enrollment in 2015: 738
Enrollment in 2014: 827
Enrollment in 2013: 796
Enrollment in 2012: 773
Enrollment in 2011: 687
Enrollment in 2010: 666
Enrollment in 2009: 649
Enrollment in 2008: 645
Enrollment in 2007: 634
Enrollment in 2006: 695
Enrollment in 2005: 716
Enrollment in 2004: 691
Enrollment in 2003: 720
Enrollment in 2002: 691
Enrollment in 2001: 737
Enrollment in 2000: 737
Enrollment in 1999: 791

Ulze Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradeKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students107108119129123132718
Female students564865606655350
Male students516054695777368
American Indian/Alaska Native students114623329
Asian students - - 212510
Hispanic students718584107103102552
Black students9611851150
White students16131611101177

Enrollment by grade:
Kindergarten enrollment: 107
1st grade enrollment: 108
2nd grade enrollment: 119
3rd grade enrollment: 129
4th grade enrollment: 123
5th grade enrollment: 132

Ulze Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 350 (48.7%)
Ulze Elementary School:

48.7%
State:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 368 (51.3%)
Here:

51.3%
Texas:

50.1%

Ulze Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 29 (4.0%)
Here:

4.0%
State:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 10 (1.4%)
Ulze Elementary School:

1.4%
State:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 552 (76.9%)
Ulze Elementary School:

76.9%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 50 (7.0%)
School:

7.0%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 77 (10.7%)
Ulze Elementary School:

10.7%
Texas:

32.3%

Ulze Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 634 (88.3%)
Ulze Elementary School:

88.3%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 582 (81.1%)
School:

81.1%
Texas:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 52 (7.2%)
Here:

7.2%
Texas:

6.2%

Ulze Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 44

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 5
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 8
Number of FTE school counselors: 2
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 4

Student/Teacher Ratio
Here:

16.3
State:

15.6

Ulze Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $2,557,939
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 40 (Salary Expenditures: $2,120,076)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 5 (Salary Expenditures: $88,554)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $111,780)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $237,529)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $109,604
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $3,184,528
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $2,498,936
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 12 (Salary Expenditures: $227,203)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $220,860)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $237,529)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $146,099

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic46
  • Asian4
  • Black2
  • White4
  • IDEA2
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 56 (male: 29, female: 27)
  • Hispanic: 46 (male: 23, female: 23)
  • Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 32 (male: 25, female: 7)
  • Hispanic: 32 (male: 25, female: 7)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 13 (all male)

    Students with disabilities served under Section 504

  • Hispanic37
  • American Indian2
  • Black10
  • White7
  • LEP22
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 56 (male: 38, female: 18)
  • Hispanic: 37 (male: 23, female: 14)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 22 (male: 17, female: 5)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,201 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
Ulze Elementary School:

1.9%
Texas:

5.2%


Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)

This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic82
  • Asian4
  • White2
  • LEP52
  • IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 88 (male: 43, female: 45)
  • Hispanic: 82 (male: 41, female: 41)
  • Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 52 (male: 23, female: 29)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Ulze Elementary School:

122.6
Texas:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,428
  • Males1,459
  • Females1,391
  • Hispanic1,431
  • Black1,335
  • White1,444
Math Average Scale Score:

1,428
State:

1,453
Math students tested: 117
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 117

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.1 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.4 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.9 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.5 (64%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 24%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 12%

38%
24%
26%
12%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,459, Tested: 64, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 16%)
33%
20%
31%
16%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,391, Tested: 53, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 45%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 8%)
45%
29%
18%
8%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,431, Tested: 98, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 11%)
36%
25%
28%
11%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,335, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 80%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
80%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,444, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 46%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 23%)
46%
16%
15%
23%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,380
  • Males1,389
  • Females1,369
  • Hispanic1,384
  • Black1,299
  • White1,390
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,380
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 115
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 116

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.5 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.3 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.8 (55%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 12%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 14%

42%
32%
12%
14%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,389, Tested: 63, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 19%)
38%
30%
13%
19%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,369, Tested: 52, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 46%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 8%)
46%
35%
11%
8%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,384, Tested: 96, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 39%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 15%)
39%
33%
13%
15%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,299, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 80%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
80%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,390, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 46%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 15%)
46%
31%
8%
15%

3rd Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 2
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 2


Reading students tested: 3
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 3


4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,544
  • Males1,540
  • Females1,547
  • Hispanic1,543
  • Black1,486
Math Average Scale Score:

1,544
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 112
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 112

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.9 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.5 (62%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 31%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 16%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 24%

29%
31%
16%
24%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,540, Tested: 47, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 21%)
32%
23%
24%
21%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,547, Tested: 65, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 26%)
28%
35%
11%
26%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,543, Tested: 91, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 24%)
31%
29%
16%
24%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,486, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 10%)
40%
40%
10%
10%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,456
  • Males1,454
  • Females1,458
  • Hispanic1,450
  • Black1,417
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,456
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 112
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 112

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.6 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.3 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.3 (56%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 53%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 24%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 8%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 15%

53%
24%
8%
15%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,454, Tested: 47, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 53%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 4%, Masters: 15%)
53%
28%
4%
15%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,458, Tested: 65, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 52%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 15%)
52%
22%
11%
15%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,450, Tested: 91, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 54%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 6%, Masters: 15%)
54%
25%
6%
15%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,417, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 70%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 10%)
70%
10%
10%
10%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,479
  • Males3,440
  • Females3,507
  • Hispanic3,454
  • Black3,474
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,479
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 111
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 111

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3 (37%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 3.8 (47%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.3 (58%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 64%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 12%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 16%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 8%

64%
12%
16%
8%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,440, Tested: 46, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 67%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 11%)
67%
11%
11%
11%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,507, Tested: 65, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 62%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 6%)
62%
12%
20%
6%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,454, Tested: 90, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 64%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 7%)
64%
14%
15%
7%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,474, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 70%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 10%)
70%
20%
10%

4th Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 2
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 2


Reading students tested: 2
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 2


Writing students tested: 3
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 3


5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,565
  • Males1,547
  • Females1,584
  • Hispanic1,572
  • Black1,495
  • White1,513
Math Average Scale Score:

1,565
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 117
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 117

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.4 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.5 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.9 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.1 (53%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 15%

33%
27%
25%
15%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,547, Tested: 59, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 39%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 8%)
39%
24%
29%
8%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,584, Tested: 58, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 22%)
28%
29%
21%
22%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,572, Tested: 102, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 16%)
31%
27%
26%
16%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,495, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 13%)
50%
37%
13%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,513, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 20%)
60%
20%
20%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,527
  • Males1,478
  • Females1,577
  • Hispanic1,530
  • Black1,489
  • White1,489
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,527
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 117
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 117

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.2 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.3 (59%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

37%
28%
19%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,478, Tested: 59, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 47%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 8%, Masters: 7%)
47%
38%
8%
7%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,577, Tested: 58, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 26%)
26%
19%
29%
26%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,530, Tested: 102, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 16%)
36%
28%
20%
16%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,489, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 13%)
50%
37%
13%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,489, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 20%)
40%
40%
20%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,793
  • Males3,737
  • Females3,850
  • Hispanic3,811
  • Black3,648
  • White3,638
Science Average Scale Score:

3,793
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 118
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 118

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.8 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.8 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.5 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.2 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 37%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 17%

27%
37%
19%
17%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,737, Tested: 59, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 12%)
32%
36%
20%
12%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,850, Tested: 59, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 22%)
22%
39%
17%
22%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,811, Tested: 103, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 17%)
26%
36%
21%
17%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,648, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 62%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 13%)
25%
62%
13%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,638, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 20%)
60%
20%
20%

5th Grade (Spanish)

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,592
  • Females1,535
  • Hispanic1,592
Math Average Scale Score:

1,592
State:

298
Math students tested: 7
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 7

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.7 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.9 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 1.9 (46%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 29%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 14%

29%
28%
29%
14%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,535, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
40%
40%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,592, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 14%)
29%
28%
29%
14%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,576
  • Females1,524
  • Hispanic1,576
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,576
Texas:

683
Reading students tested: 7
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 7

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.6 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.7 (55%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 14%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 28%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 29%

29%
14%
28%
29%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,524, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 20%)
40%
20%
20%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,576, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 29%)
29%
14%
28%
29%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade (Spanish))

  • All3,674
  • Females3,497
  • Hispanic3,674
Science Average Scale Score:

3,674
State:

857
Science students tested: 7
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 7

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.6 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.3 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.1 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 7.7 (64%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 14%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 43%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

43%
14%
43%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,497, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
60%
20%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,674, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 0%)
43%
14%
43%

Health & Safety


Referrals and Arrests:
Show data for

(State average from 1,516 schools)

Referral to law enforcement is an action by which a student is reported to any law enforcement agency or official, including a school police unit, for an incident that occurs on school grounds, during school-related events, or while taking school transportation, regardless of whether official action is taken. Citations, tickets, court referrals, and school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.

School-related arrest refers to an arrest of a student for any activity conducted on school grounds, during off-campus school activities (including while taking school transportation), or due to a referral by any school official. All school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.
Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official: 4 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official per 1,000 students
Here:

5.6
State:

17.4


Harassment & Bullying:
Show data for

(State average from 919 schools)

An allegation is a claim or assertion that someone has done something wrong or illegal, typically made without proof.

Harassment or bullying on the basis of sex includes sexual harassment or bullying and gender-based harassment or bullying. Sexual harassment or bullying is unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature, such as unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal, nonverbal, or physical conduct of a sexual nature. Gender-based harassment or bullying is nonsexual intimidation or abusive behavior toward a student based on the student's actual or perceived sex, including harassment based on gender identity, gender expression, and nonconformity with gender stereotypes. Harassing conduct may take many forms, including verbal acts and name-calling, as well as non-verbal behavior, such as graphic and written statements, or conduct that is physically threatening, harmful or humiliating. The conduct can be carried out by school employees, other students, and non-employee third parties. Both male and female students can be victims of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex, and the harasser or bully and the victim can be of the same sex. Bullying on the basis of sex constitutes sexual harassment.

Harassment or bullying on the basis of race, color, or national origin refers to intimidation or abusive behavior toward a student based on actual or perceived race, color or national origin. Harassing conduct may take many forms, including verbal acts and name-calling, as well as non-verbal behavior, such as graphic and written statements, or conduct that is physically threatening, harmful or humiliating. The conduct can be carried out by school employees, other students, and non-employee third parties. Bullying on the basis of race, color, or national origin constitutes racial harassment.

Harassment or bullying on the basis of disability refers to intimidation or abusive behavior toward a student based on actual or perceived disability. Harassing conduct may take many forms, including verbal acts and name-calling, as well as non-verbal behavior, such as graphic and written statements, or conduct that is physically threatening, harmful or humiliating. The conduct can be carried out by school employees, other students, and non-employee third parties. Bullying on the basis of disability constitutes disability harassment.
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex: 4
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of sex per 1,000 students
Ulze Elementary School:

5.6
Texas:

2.5
Students reported as harassed or bullied on the basis of sex: 6 (male: 2, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all female)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Students disciplined for bullying or harassment on the basis of sex: 4 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • White: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2


Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of race, color, or national origin: 2
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of race, color, or national origin per 1,000 students
Ulze Elementary School:

2.8
State:

1.3
Students reported as harassed or bullied on the basis of race, color, or national origin: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

    Students disciplined for bullying or harassment on the basis of race, color, or national origin

  • Hispanic2
  • Black2
  • LEP2
  • 5042
Students disciplined for bullying or harassment on the basis of race, color, or national origin: 4 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Black: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
  • Section 504: 2


Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of disability: 1
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of disability per 1,000 students
School:

1.4
State:

0.4
Students reported as harassed or bullied on the basis of disability: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2



Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic37
  • American Indian2
  • Black2
  • White7
  • LEP22
  • IDEA10
  • 5045
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 48 (male: 27, female: 21)
  • Hispanic: 37 (male: 20, female: 17)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 22 (male: 11, female: 11)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • Section 504: 5 (all male)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Here:

66.9
Texas:

147.9

Restraint and Seclusion:
Show data for

(State average from 2,148 schools)

Physical restraint refers to a personal restriction that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a student to move his or her torso, arms, legs, or head freely. The term physical restraint does not include a physical escort. Physical escort means a temporary touching or holding of the hand, wrist, arm, shoulder or back for the purpose of inducing a student who is acting out to walk to a safe location.
Total Number of students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2

Students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint per 1,000 students
Here:

2.8
Texas:

6.8


Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)

Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.

    School days missed due to out-of-school suspension

  • Hispanic28
  • American Indian3
  • White2
  • LEP12
  • IDEA10
  • 5044
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 33 (male: 31, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 28 (male: 26, female: 2)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 3 (all male)
  • White: 2 (all male)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 12 (male: 10, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 10 (all male)
  • Section 504: 4 (all male)

Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 13

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
Here:

18.1
Texas:

102.7

    Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Hispanic14
  • American Indian2
  • Black2
  • White2
  • LEP14
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 20 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 14
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2
  • Black: 2
  • White: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 14

Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 4 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students with disabilities): 8

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students with disabilities)
Ulze Elementary School:

11.1
Texas:

27.5
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Section 504 only): 4

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Section 504 only)
Ulze Elementary School:

5.6
State:

12.0

    Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Hispanic5
  • Black2
  • White5
  • LEP2
  • 5048
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 12 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 5
  • Black: 2
  • White: 5
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
  • Section 504: 8

    Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension

  • Hispanic5
  • White2
  • LEP2
  • 5045
Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 7 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 5
  • White: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
  • Section 504: 5

Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Irving, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2021 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents