Why God cannot exist!
Posted 02-25-2013 at 07:46 AM by Carneades-SkepticGriggsy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carneades-SkepticGriggsy
That shyster, Dinesh D'Souza, in a debate claims that why, he and other Christians go beyond the Bible for morality! Haughty John Haught preaches that why, the message of that anthology is not morality but hope? Where is that hope in murdering the first born of the Egyptians or in the myth of Hell. What are the good metaphors that he, D'Souza, John Shelby Spong and Leo Booth find in such twaddle?
Errantists [non-fundamentalists] double-talk as well as inerrantists, and Prof. Irwin Cory makes more sense!
Theologians proffer misinterpretations of evidence as evidence, and theology ranks with the woo of the paranormal, together making what Paul Kurtz calls " The Transcendental Temptation," a must read book.
I nee no relationship with that square circle for purpose in my life. Indeed, theologians blaspheme humanity and - morality by prattling that we need Him to give us purpose! What a travesty to make us his property to which He gives purpose.
" Life is its own validation and reward and ultimate meaning to which neither God nor the future state can further validate." Inquiring Lynn
We are ourselves that ultimate meaning no matter that the Universe will disappear, being replaced by others in cycles. WLC and Francisco Jose Ayala can whine and prattle that why, that's terrible!
We Epicureans note with Epicurus that:"Death should not concern us, for where we are death has not come, and when death comes, we are not." This does not mean that others won't grieve for our passing.
We stoics take death in stride.
We utilitarians find eudemonia - human flourishing -well-being in this one life.
We Kantians will this as a categorical imperative.
How can one find a personal relationship with a square circle- a nothing?
Errantists [non-fundamentalists] double-talk as well as inerrantists, and Prof. Irwin Cory makes more sense!
Theologians proffer misinterpretations of evidence as evidence, and theology ranks with the woo of the paranormal, together making what Paul Kurtz calls " The Transcendental Temptation," a must read book.
I nee no relationship with that square circle for purpose in my life. Indeed, theologians blaspheme humanity and - morality by prattling that we need Him to give us purpose! What a travesty to make us his property to which He gives purpose.
" Life is its own validation and reward and ultimate meaning to which neither God nor the future state can further validate." Inquiring Lynn
We are ourselves that ultimate meaning no matter that the Universe will disappear, being replaced by others in cycles. WLC and Francisco Jose Ayala can whine and prattle that why, that's terrible!
We Epicureans note with Epicurus that:"Death should not concern us, for where we are death has not come, and when death comes, we are not." This does not mean that others won't grieve for our passing.
We stoics take death in stride.
We utilitarians find eudemonia - human flourishing -well-being in this one life.
We Kantians will this as a categorical imperative.
How can one find a personal relationship with a square circle- a nothing?
Total Comments 0
