Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Alaska
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-10-2008, 05:01 PM
 
Location: The Woods
18,358 posts, read 26,510,277 times
Reputation: 11351

Advertisements

Coal gasification used to be a big thing in the U.S. and Europe (and Canada of course). For gas for lighting mainly, later on heating and cooking. The byproduct was refined down into various fuels, including something resembling kerosene (hence the term coal oil in reference to kerosene lamps, since lamps burning coal oil came out before kerosene from crude oil did). In any case, the biggest problem is pollution. Old coal gas plant sites these days are still often quite heavily contaminated despite the fact that coal gas hasn't been used on a large scale in decades. Once this problem can be solved it can help with some of the energy problems. I'm thinking about making a wood gas generator for my own use on my "homestead," works pretty much the same way, except I'll use the gas straight as it comes from the generator after a bit of cleaning. Coal gas and wood gas are both poisonous unburnt, since they contain a lot of carbon monoxide, so I think liability issues may also hold the technology back from being used on a wide scale again. If a person has a natural gas leak, it's possible it can explode, but it's relatively non-toxic. A coal gas or wood gas leak, however, and you're looking at carbon monoxide poisoning pretty quickly. Abraham Lincoln almost died in 1864 from a coal gas leak (from the gas lighting).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-10-2008, 05:07 PM
 
Location: Madtown
286 posts, read 1,151,279 times
Reputation: 163
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barkingowl View Post
Ray what does it matter how much CO2 gas is released? I'd think that the 2 volcanoes erupting in the Aleutians are putting out vastly more CO2 than a plant could ever hope to emit.
You know what CO2 is good for? Plants. Green plants consume CO2 right out of the air. Thats how plants get their carbon, and then they exhale oxygen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2008, 05:27 PM
 
Location: The Woods
18,358 posts, read 26,510,277 times
Reputation: 11351
Quote:
Originally Posted by gallon View Post
You know what CO2 is good for? Plants. Green plants consume CO2 right out of the air. Thats how plants get their carbon, and then they exhale oxygen.
Yeah but we need enough plants for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2008, 05:32 PM
 
Location: Wasilla
1,331 posts, read 3,001,873 times
Reputation: 348
This whole C02/Global warming issue is one of the biggest hoaxes ever attempted in human history.

On one hand, you have leftist politicians pushing this garbage because they'll be able to jack taxes up to fight a non-existent problem and therefore exert more control over people's lives.

On the other, you have many scientists who have sacrificed their integrity for the lure of billions in government grants to study a purely made-up crisis. It's disgusting actually.

Quote:
The hypothesis of dangerous human-caused warming caused by CO2 emission is embroiled in uncertainties of the fundamental science and its interpretation, and by fallacious public discussion. It is utterly bizarre that, in face of this reality, public funding of many billions of dollars is still being provided for climate change research. It is even more bizarre that most governments, urged on by environmental NGSs and other self-interested parties, have either already introduced carbon taxation or trading systems (Europe; some groups of US States), or have indicated a firm intention to do so (Australia).
At its most basic, if scientists cannot be sure that temperatures are today rising, nor establish that the gentle late 20th century warming was caused by CO2 emissions, then it is nonsense to propose that expensive controls are needed on human carbon dioxide emissions.
Global Warming Science and Public Policy - Fallacies about Global Warming (http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/sppi_originals/fallacies_about_global_warming.html - broken link)

Quote:
The IPCC’s 2007 climate summary overstated CO2’s impact on temperature by 500-2000%;

CO2 enrichment will add little more than 1 °F (0.6 °C) to global mean surface temperature by 2100;

Not one of the three key variables whose product is climate sensitivity can be measured directly;

The IPCC’s values for these key variables are taken from only four published papers, not 2,500;

The IPCC’s values for each of the three variables, and hence for climate sensitivity, are overstated;

“Global warming” halted ten years ago, and surface temperature has been falling for seven years;

Not one of the computer models relied upon by the IPCC predicted so long and rapid a cooling;

The IPCC inserted a table into the scientists’ draft, overstating the effect of ice-melt by 1000%;

It was proved 50 years ago that predicting climate more than two weeks ahead is impossible;

Mars, Jupiter, Neptune’s largest moon, and Pluto warmed at the same time as Earth warmed;

In the past 70 years the Sun was more active than at almost any other time in the past 11,400 years
Global Warming Science and Public Policy - Proved: There is No Climate Crisis
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2008, 05:33 PM
 
Location: Madtown
286 posts, read 1,151,279 times
Reputation: 163
Quote:
Originally Posted by arctichomesteader View Post
Yeah but we need enough plants for it.
Pity about loosing the Amazon rainforest then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2008, 05:40 PM
 
Location: Charlotte, NC
11,839 posts, read 28,969,096 times
Reputation: 2809
Well what about the rainforest in Juneau?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2008, 05:40 PM
 
Location: Madtown
286 posts, read 1,151,279 times
Reputation: 163
Quote:
Originally Posted by Classic Satch View Post
This whole C02/Global warming issue is one of the biggest hoaxes ever attempted in human history.

On one hand, you have leftist politicians pushing this garbage because they'll be able to jack taxes up to fight a non-existent problem and therefore exert more control over people's lives.

On the other, you have many scientists who have sacrificed their integrity for the lure of billions in government grants to study a purely made-up crisis. It's disgusting actually.

Global Warming Science and Public Policy - Fallacies about Global Warming (http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/sppi_originals/fallacies_about_global_warming.html - broken link)

Global Warming Science and Public Policy - Proved: There is No Climate Crisis


?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2008, 05:43 PM
 
Location: Madtown
286 posts, read 1,151,279 times
Reputation: 163
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barkingowl View Post
Well what about the rainforest in Juneau?
Green is good.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2008, 05:43 PM
 
Location: Wasilla
1,331 posts, read 3,001,873 times
Reputation: 348
Quote:
Originally Posted by gallon View Post
?
Huh? Just exposing some myths that could cost us all dearly if a certain individual is elected president and imposes idiotic "carbon taxes" and other such nonsense. You want to talk about increased heating costs if the inmates take total control of the asylum, which could happen(God I hope not) this November?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2008, 06:36 PM
 
Location: Charlotte, NC
11,839 posts, read 28,969,096 times
Reputation: 2809
Don't forget Satch, a carbon tax will be a tax on our right to breathe. We produce carbon you know?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Alaska
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top