Not looking good for McSally

[DetroitN8V]

Originally Posted by Hschlick84

Mail in ballots should be arriving today and will be voting against this clown right away. I don't own any guns, but fully support the 2A and everybody's right to own one. A vote for McSally is a vote against Mark Kelly.

Absolutely brilliant! Is that how it works? So if you vote for one of the two choices, it means you’re not supporting the other? What a breakthrough!

LOL

[ttboy]

[quote=DetroitN8V;59363051][/b]

Absolutely brilliant! Is that how it works? So if you vote for one of the two choices, it means you’re not supporting the other? What a breakthrough!

LOL[/QUOTE

Interesting you should applaud his enthusiasm to vote than ridicule it

[DetroitN8V]

Originally Posted by ttboy

Interesting you should applaud his enthusiasm to vote than ridicule it

Interesting that I should applaud his enthusiasm? I'm not. I don't think you understand. I'm pointing out the absurdity that it's somehow profound to say that a binary choice isn't a vote for the opposite candidate. If that's the level of insight these voters have, well, yikes. I think it's safe to say at this point that McSally only has the votes of those with extreme tunnel vision. She lost once before, what has changed?

[ttboy]

Originally Posted by DetroitN8V

Interesting that I should applaud his enthusiasm? I'm not. I don't think you understand. I'm pointing out the absurdity that it's somehow profound to say that a binary choice isn't a vote for the opposite candidate. If that's the level of insight these voters have, well, yikes. I think it's safe to say at this point that McSally only has the votes of those with extreme tunnel vision. She lost once before, what has changed?

After reading your post you come off as very condescending it is not for you or anyone to question ones motivation to vote.

[DetroitN8V]

Originally Posted by ttboy

After reading your post you come off as very condescending it is not for you or anyone to question ones motivation to vote.

I didn't question anyone's motivation to vote, so again, I don't think you're following along. I'm just going off of the rambling one-issue rhetoric that's taken over the last five pages of this thread. Again, McSally already lost once before. What has changed that won't make her a two-time loser?

[Bondurant]

Originally Posted by sh9730

Can we get this topic back onto McSally versus Kelly please? While the gun rights aspect is a bit related - this thread has now turned into a gun rights thread predominantly - which makes this the incorrect forum. Thank you mods.

It is more than a bit related. It is a driving factor for many including myself. Gun rights is the only reason I will be voting for McSally.

[ttboy]

Originally Posted by DetroitN8V

I didn't question anyone's motivation to vote, so again, I don't think you're following along. I'm just going off of the rambling one-issue rhetoric that's taken over the last five pages of this thread. Again, McSally already lost once before. What has changed that won't make her a two-time loser?

Well to many people the US Constitution is a very important subject, I will not waver in my support for it call that rambling so be it. Mark Kelly is tippy toeing around gun control and only recently his staff have said he will remain silent on it until after he is elected which is very disingenuous and cowardly he should stand up for what he believes in, his lack of character on the subject paints him as a typical politician

[Mike from back east]

Thread has become irredeemable by going far afield from a simple discussion of what two candidates offer us.

Thread closed.