Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Atheism and Agnosticism
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-16-2021, 07:56 AM
 
12,030 posts, read 9,359,390 times
Reputation: 2848

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by LargeKingCat View Post

I'd love to see my son break that dark matter challenge and win the Noble prize. Are we to say "Maybe Dark Matter is GOd?" no We say that dark matter likely exists and likely causes a dark halo in a collider, but so far, we have not the technology to observe or prove it. And so what if it does not exist? If science points to the non-existence of it, then we will move on.
Regarding dark matter. We are in the same shoes as Saint Thomas of Aquina in the 12th century when he sort of described the Big Bang to prove the existence of God. He likely got the idea from Aristotle.

Quote:
And if God does not exist? Well, most of the known universe points to the non-existence of God, we have no evidence whatsoever for the existence of God, but religious people will continue to believe and worship such anyway.
Whether God is real or not is a moot point. What has made a difference in world history is the concept of a God at a time when there was no science.

In the end atheism is an absolutist position that sees these issues as black or white. Others use atheism to seek some sort of goofy enlightenment. They forget that in the past deeply religious people had the abilities to make great scientific discoveries. Isaac Newton contemplated the priesthood and he also believed in alchemy.

I rather be an agnostic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-16-2021, 08:51 AM
 
Location: Germany
16,813 posts, read 5,014,859 times
Reputation: 2125
And the 2nd thread derail begins.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2021, 09:29 AM
 
Location: Somewhere out there.
10,537 posts, read 6,181,429 times
Reputation: 6580
Quote:
Originally Posted by LargeKingCat View Post
So if I would start off referencing that a belief in God or gods has likely been part of the human experience for as long as humans have had self awareness.
The operative word here is 'likely'.

There is no way of knowing what people believed in the early days of humanity before we learned to communicate with drawing, language and writing. We have no actual way of knowing if people believed in anything. We have no control group so to speak.

Certainly in the early days of human history, polytheism or a belief in many gods was the common theme throughout Roman, Greek, Pagan and almost all other cultures up until the Bronze age. Monotheism is relatively recent in the grand scheme of things.

Sadly it has become clear to me in recent years and particularly in recent months, that belief in god is not actually the disappointing thing, but humans seemingly infinite capacity to believe any and all absolute unadulterated nonsense and garbage they are told, despite glaringly obvious evidence to the contrary.
I've never been more disappointed in humanity. It feels like we have barely advanced at all since the Bronze age. If I had written this post a few years ago I'd have probably had a different response. Sadly, recent events have had a permanent impact on my view of humanity.
We are easily led and easily influenced and most of us lack the capacity to think for ourselves.
So in answer to the question, yes I think it is likely that humans have believed in nonsense for millennia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2021, 09:33 AM
 
28,432 posts, read 11,610,454 times
Reputation: 2070
Quote:
Originally Posted by LargeKingCat View Post

nipped for space ...

And if God does not exist? Well, most of the known universe points to the non-existence of God, we have no evidence whatsoever for the existence of God, but religious people will continue to believe and worship such anyway.
You are mixing up two ideas and over generalizing to me. One is the idea of worship. That's emotional and doesn't do anything for what is there or what is not there.

The other is what do most people believe. Most people, due to science and commonsense, believe that there is some thing there. Some atheist seem to have to come up with very convoluted logic to deny that any thing is there.

I think of apologetics as cherry picking. Cherry pick the beliefs that have science and leave the ones that don't. "deny everything to help social change" is a whole nother ball of wax that seriously confuses emotional need with the realities of the situation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2021, 09:40 AM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
50,946 posts, read 24,450,069 times
Reputation: 33014
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julian658 View Post
This is an excellent perspective. I have been telling forum members that tribalism and believing in deities was a huge component of human evolution. And yet the rookie atheists get off on making fun of allegoric bible passages or put down the role on Christianity in Western Civilization. Your average Atheists is not an atheist, they are simply anti-religion types.
And based on that history of religion -- a lot of which you seem to have forgotten or make excuses for -- it may be very valid to be anti-religion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2021, 10:21 AM
 
28,432 posts, read 11,610,454 times
Reputation: 2070
The same can be said for how you conveniently some forget about the good and make excuses for only looking looking at the bad half -- it may be very valid to be freedom of religion.

In fact, based on all the information, freedom of religion trounces anti-religion to the point of making anti-religion an irrational position.

But in the end you are right. if we ignore certain things, anti-religion can be valid. I guess.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2021, 11:26 AM
 
63,923 posts, read 40,194,112 times
Reputation: 7887
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Diogenes View Post
And the 2nd thread derail begins.
Refuting your atheist default apologetic is NOT a derail, Harry. Get over it and try to learn something. You should also try thinking beyond your atheist-proscribed boundaries.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2021, 01:31 PM
 
12,030 posts, read 9,359,390 times
Reputation: 2848
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Diogenes View Post
And the 2nd thread derail begins.
You are massively afraid of philosophical discussions that contradict you.
Carry on!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2021, 01:40 PM
 
12,030 posts, read 9,359,390 times
Reputation: 2848
Quote:
Originally Posted by phetaroi View Post
And based on that history of religion -- a lot of which you seem to have forgotten or make excuses for -- it may be very valid to be anti-religion.
Religion is one thing.
Whether God is real or not is something else. New atheists tend to confuse these two.

A believe in a deity was an integral part of human evolution. Nowadays the deity is replaced by non deity causes. Sadly, the same irrational fervor persists.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2021, 02:26 PM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
50,946 posts, read 24,450,069 times
Reputation: 33014
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julian658 View Post
Religion is one thing.
Whether God is real or not is something else. New atheists tend to confuse these two.

A believe in a deity was an integral part of human evolution. Nowadays the deity is replaced by non deity causes. Sadly, the same irrational fervor persists.
Don't confuse and try to now change the topic I was responding to, which was your statement: "Your average Atheists is not an atheist, they are simply anti-religion types". And my response was: "And based on that history of religion -- a lot of which you seem to have forgotten or make excuses for -- it may be very valid to be anti-religion".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Atheism and Agnosticism
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:04 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top