Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-14-2014, 12:35 PM
 
10,392 posts, read 11,485,251 times
Reputation: 7829

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by gtcorndog View Post
I understand the desire for rail to Macon. I get that. I don't think it is warranted though. The discussion jumps the shark when other goofy extension ideas with bad assumptions are thrown in. I'd focus on the cities in the 40 mile range that have a chance of developing a good commuter base. That is where the real value is IMO.
At this point in time of a fast-growing population that is continuing to boom and place vehicles on a severely-constrained regional road network, most outlying places within that 40 mile range (Cumming, Buford, Canton, Lawrenceville, etc) are in need of regional HRT, both for logistical and economic development purposes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gtcorndog View Post
Given the finite resources we have, spending money on plans that don't provide real, immediate, needed transportation solutions is not a good strategy. Doing "nice to haves" is not a luxury we have.
I agree with your point that the transportation projects that are implemented need to have an immediate impact if we are using our almost totally-depleted current resources to pay for them.

But we should not and cannot invest only in transportation projects that provide immediate and very short-term traffic relief. It is critically-important that we also invest heavily in transportation projects that have a long-term benefit for purposes of both logistical enhancement and economic development.

And if we don't have the resources available to invest in those transportation projects that provide a long-term benefit (heck, right now we don't even really have the resources on hand to invest in many transportation projects that provide a short-term benefit) then we have to find ways to come up with the resources to do so....That's because transportation is something that is critical to our existence.

Without a viable and functioning multimodal transportation network (roads and transit) our economy and our quality-of-life will suffer greatly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gtcorndog View Post
That is why I oppose the streetcar and the Clifton Corridor projects.
While I'm not necessarily all that crazy about the Atlanta Streetcar as a logistical benefit, I do think that the Atlanta Streetcar is an excellent economic development purposes. I just wish that the Atlanta Streetcar project was financed and funded differently and much more creatively with real estate development revenues and a Value Capture taxing district (a CID, TAD and TIF) instead of being so overly-reliant on federal aid.

The Clifton Corridor is an absolute logistical necessity because of the lack of easy automobile access to and from one of the Atlanta region's major employment and activity centers in the Emory University area (Emory is accessible mostly only by severely-congested 2-lane roads). Though I do think that an area as important as Emory University needs grade-separated, dedicated-track Heavy Rail Transit access instead of Light Rail Transit that would attempt to operate on constrained area streets that are already crowded with traffic during daylight hours.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gtcorndog View Post
I do think that projects like the MARTA 400 extension, the 285/400 interchange reconstruction and BRT in Cobb are good projects because they either impact a massive audience or offer a transportation solution that doesn't currently exist along routes that don't have alternatives. I am in favor of mor express buss or BRT service because it offers much of the same benefits without the same capital requirements. I don't care if BRT isn't sexy. It offers a solution and if traffic is bad enough, people will ride it.
I agree that projects like the GA 400 MARTA extension and the I-285/GA 400 interchange are good investments of transportation funds.

I also agree that there is a place for higher-frequency and/or higher-capacity bus service to be utilized in the Atlanta region. Though, I think that higher-frequency and higher-capacity bus service (including BRT, where adequate) needs to be operated in conjunction with high-capacity passenger rail transit service....And I think that it is critically-important that both higher-capacity bus service and high-capacity passenger rail transit service be self-funded with revenues from streams like transit-owned real estate development, Value Capture taxing districts, private sponsorships and private donations.

Also, like others have stated before, I don't think that BRT is the absolute best high-capacity transit option for a high-capacity transportation corridor like Cobb Parkway which at this point desperately needs high-capacity passenger rail transit service and has been in need of high-capacity passenger rail transit service for many years.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gtcorndog View Post
If you have to convince people transit is cool in order to get them to ride, then the transportation situation isn't bad enough for them to switch. If the alternative is more efficient than driving, they'll ride. It isn't a hard concept IMO.
One of the reasons that people are not riding transit in large numbers in large major metro region with severe traffic congestion problems like Atlanta is because the transit that is often available is inadequate in its availability (...at this point Metro Atlanta's transit offerings are relatively extremely-limited in geographical reach, inconsistent in its availability and inconvenient to use, particularly for those who live outside of the I-285 Perimeter).

That's a good point that people will ride transit if it is more efficient than driving....Which is why we need to make the investments that are necessary to make transit as quick, efficient, effective and convenient to use as possible so that transit will be a viable option for most commuters in a large major metro region with as severely-constrained of a road network as Atlanta.

Last edited by Born 2 Roll; 07-14-2014 at 01:14 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-14-2014, 12:37 PM
 
Location: Atlanta, Ga
2,490 posts, read 2,544,648 times
Reputation: 2057
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gulch View Post
Reading the comments section made my eyes burn.
Mine too... Geez these people alone could disprove the theory of natural selection.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2014, 04:48 PM
 
7,112 posts, read 10,130,121 times
Reputation: 1781
Quote:
Originally Posted by bu2 View Post
Basically the hassle and security delays in airports make 200-600 miles work well for trains.
Lately, I've been zipping through the TSA. Doesn't bode well for HSR.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2014, 12:01 PM
 
Location: Kirkwood
23,726 posts, read 24,854,509 times
Reputation: 5703
Default $45M in FTA funds not taken away from corridor

Commuter rail from Atlanta to Lovejoy is: ‘The Little Engine That Could’ | SaportaReport
Maria Saporta explains:
Quote:
There was a misunderstanding because of the wording of the FTA letter,” said Lemon, who has had her facts checked out with all the powers that be. “The deobligating of those funds basically said to Georgia DOT, because you haven’t done anything in a long, long while, we are going to take your name off those funds. When you get ready to use these funds for construction of the commuter rail line, then you simply apply to the FTA to reauthorize those funds.

- See more at: Commuter rail from Atlanta to Lovejoy is: ‘The Little Engine That Could’ | SaportaReport
Quote:
The letter stated that the reason for deobligating the funds was because over the years, GDOT “was unable to secure the local financial share” of the cost of the project. The Clayton tax would qualify for that local share.

- See more at: Commuter rail from Atlanta to Lovejoy is: ‘The Little Engine That Could’ | SaportaReport
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-15-2014, 01:42 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
5,242 posts, read 6,236,024 times
Reputation: 2783
I read the letter from NS and its not quite as bad as Maria made it out to be. It would be nice if they took a more welcoming or cooperative tone towards commuter rail, but I can understand their position.

NS is potentially being put in a position to look like the bad guy due to rosy and inaccurate cost projections. In the future, after environmental studies and engineering have taken place and the real cost is figured, NS is going to look like they are being uncooperative when they require costly infrastructure necessary to lessen the impact to their operations. All while politicians blame NS for being uncooperative, when really they were using inaccurate cost projections to sell the project from the get go.

But I agree, this can be a huge benefit to NS with certain infrastructure upgrades.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2014, 09:22 PM
 
Location: Georgia
4,209 posts, read 4,741,829 times
Reputation: 3626
MARTA CEO begins to build relationship with Clayton businesses | Clayton News Daily
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2014, 07:33 AM
 
2,092 posts, read 3,223,600 times
Reputation: 1103
Congressman Scott: Clayton MARTA vote could revive Macon to Atlanta commuter line - Atlanta Business Chronicle
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top